{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T02:53:46Z","timestamp":1774839226613,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]],"date-time":"2022-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1661990400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has shed light on the restoration of fragmentary masterpieces. It is said that AI-restored content can reproduce the missing part in fragmentary works, reveal authors\u2019 initial intention, and give the younger generation a chance to appreciate the essence of cultural heritage. AI restoration leads to a discussion on whether copyright law should apply to AI-restored works. The existing literature about the nexus between the restoration of works and copyright is scarce, and none is related to AI-restored works. Therefore, this paper focuses on investigating the potential copyright issues regarding AI-restored works and exploring how the traditional copyright regime fails to solve those issues. Besides, this paper suggests recalibrating the copyright regime to enhance the authenticity of AI-restored output. Lastly, this cutting-edge article provides theoretical evidence for IP scholars interested in AI-related issues and advocates future research on the relation between AI models and copyright law.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/ijlit\/eaac023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T13:32:03Z","timestamp":1667309523000},"page":"368-384","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["AI restoration brings \u2018dying\u2019 masterpieces back to life, but tricks copyright?"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Yangzi","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Law, 6\/F Lee Shau Kee Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong SAR , China"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,24]]},"container-title":["International Journal of Law and Information Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ijlit\/article-pdf\/30\/3\/368\/48421668\/eaac023.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ijlit\/article-pdf\/30\/3\/368\/48421668\/eaac023.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]],"date-time":"2022-12-27T09:01:21Z","timestamp":1672131681000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ijlit\/article\/30\/3\/368\/6845517"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ijlit\/eaac023","relation":{},"ISSN":["0967-0769","1464-3693"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0967-0769","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-3693","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,1]]}}}