{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]],"date-time":"2025-07-22T11:03:50Z","timestamp":1753182230919},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,10]],"date-time":"2022-06-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654819200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,16]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Donkey anaphora in quantified sentences is ambiguous between an existential and a universal reading. The extent to which different readings are accessible depends on the quantifier, but how to model this dependence is debated (Kanazawa, 1994; Champollion et al. 2019). This study advances this debate by providing novel experimental data on the interpretation of donkey anaphora in sentences with non-monotonic quantifiers exactly 3 and all but one. We establish that while the existential reading of donkey anaphora is the preferred one with both exactly 3 and all but one, the universal reading is accessed more with all but one than with exactly 3. These results have important implications for both Kanazawa (1994) and Champollion et al. (2019) theories, as both need to be amended to fully capture the empirical picture.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/jos\/ffac005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,21]],"date-time":"2022-02-21T20:12:41Z","timestamp":1645474361000},"page":"443-474","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Donkey Anaphora in Non-Monotonic Environments"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Milica","family":"Deni\u0107","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Amsterdam Institute for Logic, Language and Computation,"}]},{"given":"Yasutada","family":"Sudo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University College London Department of Linguistics,"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref1","volume-title":"Structured Nominal and Modal Reference","author":"Brasoveanu","year":"2007"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3765\/sp.12.1","article-title":"Donkeys under discussion","volume":"12","author":"Champollion","year":"2019","journal-title":"Semantics and Pragmatics"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s10988-012-9106-0","article-title":"Modularity and intuitions in formal semantics: The case of polarity items","volume":"34","author":"Chemla","year":"2011","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226104515.001.0001","volume-title":"Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar","author":"Chierchia","year":"1995"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref5","first-page":"61","article-title":"The interpretation of pronouns","volume-title":"Syntax and Semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groeningen Round Table","author":"Cooper","year":"1979"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref6","first-page":"101","article-title":"Donkey anaphora in non-monotonic environments","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium","author":"Deni\u0107","year":"2019"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref7","first-page":"297","article-title":"The puzzle of donkey anaphora resolution","volume-title":"NELS 38: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society","author":"Foppolo","year":"2008"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014624331450","article-title":"Donkey business","volume":"25","author":"Geurts","year":"2002","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref9","volume-title":"The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases","author":"Heim","year":"1982"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00630732","article-title":"E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora","volume":"13","author":"Heim","year":"1990","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref11","volume-title":"On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification","author":"Kadmon","year":"1987"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00627710","article-title":"Uniqueness","volume":"13","author":"Kadmon","year":"1990","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00984775","article-title":"Weak vs. strong readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inferences in a dynamic setting","volume":"17","author":"Kanazawa","year":"1994","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref14","first-page":"136","article-title":"Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences","volume-title":"Proceedings of SALT VI","author":"Krifka","year":"1996"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00635836","article-title":"Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation","volume":"19","author":"Muskens","year":"1996","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref16","volume-title":"Quantifiers in Language and Logic","author":"Peters","year":"2006"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3765\/sp.5.6","article-title":"Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics","volume":"5","author":"Roberts","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semantics and Pragmatics"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-3381-1_9","article-title":"Noun phrase interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics","volume-title":"Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches","author":"Rooth","year":"1987"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02342617","article-title":"A theory of focus interpretation","volume":"1","author":"Rooth","year":"1992","journal-title":"Natural language semantics"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-2723-0_6","article-title":"Generically speaking, or, using discourse representation theory to interpret generics","volume-title":"Properties, Types and Meaning II: Semantic Issues","author":"Schubert","year":"1989"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.12.04ste","article-title":"Focusing and backgrounding operators","volume":"6","author":"von Stechow","year":"1991","journal-title":"Discourse Particles"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref22","first-page":"289","article-title":"Exploring the existential\/universal ambiguity in singular donkey sentences","volume-title":"Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 24","author":"Sun","year":"2020"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref23","volume-title":"Weak and Strong Interpretations of Quantifiers and Definite NPs in English and Korean","author":"Yoon","year":"1994"},{"key":"2022081812274524600_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00372820","article-title":"Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations","volume":"4","author":"Yoon","year":"1996","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"}],"container-title":["Journal of Semantics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article-pdf\/39\/3\/443\/45471684\/ffac005.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article-pdf\/39\/3\/443\/45471684\/ffac005.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,18]],"date-time":"2022-08-18T12:28:58Z","timestamp":1660825738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article\/39\/3\/443\/6602412"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,6]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,16]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jos\/ffac005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-5133","1477-4593"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-5133","type":"print"},{"value":"1477-4593","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,6]]}}}