{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,29]],"date-time":"2024-06-29T00:10:32Z","timestamp":1719619832133},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,20]],"date-time":"2024-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1708387200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":19,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>We discuss previous proposals for the semantics of wh-the-hell questions (domain widening theories and domain restriction theories), highlighting the challenges these accounts face in trying to explain the different properties of wh-the-hell questions and capture the contribution this expression makes to the semantics of the question. We review the semantic properties of wh-the-hell questions discussed in the literature and propose a new analysis according to which the hell signals doxastic dissonance. We argue that this proposal accounts for the semantic properties of this type of expletive question, and has the potential to extend to the class of wh-the-hell questions we see across languages.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/jos\/ffae001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,20]],"date-time":"2024-02-20T08:54:29Z","timestamp":1708419269000},"page":"53-76","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Hell With Questions"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Michela","family":"Ippolito","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Linguistics, University of Toronto , Sidney Smith Hall, 4th floor, 100 St. George St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1093\/jos\/ffp009","article-title":"Presupposition triggering from alternatives","volume":"27","author":"Abusch","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11050-005-4532-y","article-title":"Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation","volume":"14","author":"Beck","year":"2006","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref3","first-page":"302","article-title":"Rhetorical questions: severing questioning from asking","volume-title":"Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 27","author":"Biezma","year":"2017"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref4","first-page":"121","article-title":"Rhetorical questions as questions","volume-title":"Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11","author":"Caponigro","year":"2007"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s10831-009-9051-2","article-title":"Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties","volume":"18","author":"Cheung","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of East Asian Linguistics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref6","article-title":"\u2018What \u201cshould\u201d should mean","author":"Copley","year":"2005"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1162\/002438902317382170","article-title":"From hell to polarity: \u201caggressively non-d-linked\u201d wh-phrases as polarity items","volume":"22","author":"den Dikken","year":"2002","journal-title":"Linguistic Inquiry"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1093\/jos\/ffp010","article-title":"On reacting to assertions and polar questions","volume":"27","author":"Farkas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref9","first-page":"41","article-title":"Questions in Montague english","volume":"10","author":"Hamblin","year":"1973","journal-title":"Foundations of Language"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref10","article-title":"Syntax of the hell: two types of dependencies","volume-title":"Between Suntax and Semantics","author":"Huang","year":"2009"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref11","first-page":"574","article-title":"Gestures as markers of non-canonical questions","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium","author":"Ippolito","year":"2019"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1093\/jos\/ffab007","article-title":"The contribution of gestures to the semantics of non-canonical questions","volume":"38","author":"Ippolito","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.21437\/SemDial.2017-4","article-title":"Meta-conversational since when-questions and the common ground","volume-title":"Proc. SEMDIAL 2017 (SaarDial) Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue","author":"Kiss","year":"2017"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref14","article-title":"On the semantics of wh-questions","volume-title":"Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20","author":"Kotek","year":"2016"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref15","volume-title":"Composing questions. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph","author":"Kotek","year":"2018"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110842524-004","article-title":"The notional category of modality","volume-title":"Words, Worlds, and Contexts","author":"Kratzer","year":"1981"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref17","first-page":"639","article-title":"Modality","volume-title":"Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research","author":"Kratzer","year":"1991"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.2307\/2216219","article-title":"Logic for equivocators","volume":"16","author":"Lewis","year":"1982","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref19","first-page":"334","article-title":"Wh-the-hell as a polarity insensitive, speaker-oriented domain restrictor","volume-title":"Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 30","author":"Martin","year":"2020"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref20","article-title":"The true nature of wh-the-hell phrases","volume-title":"2nd Annual Tampa Workshop pn Syntax, Semantics, and Phonology","author":"Oguro","year":"2018"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref21","first-page":"98","article-title":"Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding","volume-title":"The Representation of (In)definiteness","author":"Pesetsky","year":"1987"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref22","volume-title":"The Logic of Conventional Implicature","author":"Potts","year":"2005"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref23","first-page":"475","article-title":"Conventional implicatures: a distinguished class of meanings","volume-title":"The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces","author":"Potts","year":"2007"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref24","volume-title":"(Un)conditionals: An Investigation in the Syntax and Semantics of Conditional Structures","author":"Rawlins","year":"2008"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref25","article-title":"Extreme ignorance questions. Handout for a talk at the LSA","author":"Rawlins","year":"2009","journal-title":"Annual Meeting"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref26","first-page":"215","article-title":"Anaphora in intensional contexts","volume-title":"The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory","author":"Roberts","year":"1996"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02342617","article-title":"A theory of focus interpretation","volume":"1","author":"Rooth","year":"1992","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref28","article-title":"The accent projection principle: why the hell not?","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 29th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium","author":"Sprouse","year":"2006"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00263545","article-title":"Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking","volume":"1","author":"Szabolcsi","year":"1993","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-8354-9_6","article-title":"How to say ought in foreign: the composition of weak necessity modals","volume-title":"Time and Modality","author":"Von Fintel","year":"2008"},{"key":"2024062723403797000_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198717928.003.0009","article-title":"Modalities of normality","volume-title":"Deontic Modality","author":"Yalcin","year":"2016"}],"container-title":["Journal of Semantics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article-pdf\/41\/1\/53\/58352796\/ffae001.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article-pdf\/41\/1\/53\/58352796\/ffae001.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,27]],"date-time":"2024-06-27T23:41:18Z","timestamp":1719531678000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jos\/article\/41\/1\/53\/7610788"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,19]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jos\/ffae001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-5133","1477-4593"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-5133","type":"print"},{"value":"1477-4593","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}}}