{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T13:00:20Z","timestamp":1778504420196,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]],"date-time":"2023-01-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1674777600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this paper, we provide a formal framework for modeling the burden of persuasion in legal reasoning. The framework is based on abstract argumentation, a frequently studied method of non-monotonic reasoning, and can be applied to different argumentation semantics; it supports burdens of persuasion with arbitrary many levels, and allows for the placement of a burden of persuasion on any subset of an argumentation framework\u2019s arguments. Our framework can be considered an extension of related works that raise questions on how burdens of persuasion should be handled in some conflict scenarios that can be modeled with abstract argumentation. An open source software implementation of the introduced formal notions is available as an extension of an argumentation reasoning library. A theoretical analysis shows that our approach can be generalized to a novel method for the preference-based selection of extensions from argumentation frameworks.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exac094","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]],"date-time":"2023-01-27T13:53:32Z","timestamp":1674827612000},"page":"257-288","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A comprehensive account of the burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Timotheus","family":"Kampik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computing Science, Ume\u00e5 University , Ume\u00e5 90187, Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dov","family":"Gabbay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Informatics, King\u2019s College London , London WC2R 2, UK, and Department of Computer Science, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette 4364, Luxembourg"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Law, European University Institute , Florence 50139, Italy, and Department of Legal Studies, Universit\u00e0 di Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656","article-title":"Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks","volume":"29","author":"Amgoud","year":"2002","journal-title":"Journal of Automated Reasoning"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","article-title":"Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks","volume":"55","author":"Amgoud","year":"2014","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"1543","article-title":"Value-based argumentation","volume":"8","author":"Atkinson","year":"2021","journal-title":"IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"159","article-title":"Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications, chapter 4","author":"Baroni","year":"2018"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","author":"Baroni","year":"2018"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","article-title":"On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics","volume":"171","author":"Baroni","year":"2007","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","article-title":"Scc-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics","volume":"168","author":"Baroni","year":"2005","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"2779","article-title":"On the nature of argumentation semantics: existence and uniqueness, expressibility, and replaceability","volume":"4","author":"Baumann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Logics"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"75","article-title":"Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results","volume":"10","author":"Baumann","year":"2010","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"2742","article-title":"Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense","volume-title":"AAAI","author":"Baumann","year":"2020"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"629","article-title":"Argument strength in formal argumentation","volume":"5","author":"Beirlaen","year":"2018","journal-title":"IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18","article-title":"Argumentation in legal reasoning","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"Bench-Capon","year":"2009"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","article-title":"Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks","volume":"13","author":"Bench-Capon","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466078","article-title":"The burden of persuasion in structured argumentation","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","author":"Calegari","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4204\/EPTCS.325.21","article-title":"Burden of persuasion in argumentation","author":"Calegari","year":"2020"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_3","article-title":"Burdens of persuasion and standards of\u00c2 proof in structured argumentation","volume-title":"Logic and Argumentation","author":"Calegari","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"24","article-title":"Scf2-an argumentation semantics for rational human judgments on argument acceptability","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2019) and the 7th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2019) co-located with 44nd German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2019), Kassel, Germany, September 23, 2019","author":"Cramer","year":"2019"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","article-title":"Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics","volume":"9","author":"Doutre","year":"2018","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","article-title":"On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games","volume":"77","author":"Dung","year":"1995","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu006","article-title":"Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics","volume":"26","author":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"916","volume-title":"Standards of Persuasion and the Distinction Between Fact and Law","author":"Friedman","year":"1991"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"405","article-title":"Preference in abstract argumentation","volume-title":"Computational Models of Argument","author":"Kaci","year":"2018"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exs068","article-title":"On the semantics of abstract argumentation","volume":"23","author":"Kakas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7","article-title":"The \u2018Degrees of Monotony\u2019-dilemma in abstract argumentation","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty 2021","author":"Kampik","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_13","article-title":"The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation","volume-title":"Logic and Argumentation","author":"Kampik","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"223","article-title":"A logical analysis of burdens of proof","volume-title":"Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic","author":"Prakken","year":"2009"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"528","article-title":"Tweety: a comprehensive collection of java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning","author":"Thimm","year":"2014"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"2735","article-title":"The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics","volume":"4","author":"van der Torre","year":"2017","journal-title":"IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"357","article-title":"Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages","volume":"96","author":"Verheij","year":"1996","journal-title":"Proc. NAIC"},{"key":"2023030410205362700_","first-page":"12","article-title":"A labelling-based justification status of arguments","volume":"3","author":"Yining","year":"2010","journal-title":"Studies in Logic"}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic and Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-pdf\/33\/2\/257\/49409014\/exac094.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-pdf\/33\/2\/257\/49409014\/exac094.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,18]],"date-time":"2023-03-18T04:20:59Z","timestamp":1679113259000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article\/33\/2\/257\/7005684"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exac094","relation":{},"ISSN":["0955-792X","1465-363X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0955-792X","type":"print"},{"value":"1465-363X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]}}}