{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T20:19:52Z","timestamp":1698869992684},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Logic Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,14]],"date-time":"2014-02-14T02:55:08Z","timestamp":1392346508000},"page":"1257-1292","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Preferred semantics as socratic discussion"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Martin W. A.","family":"Caminada","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.1","unstructured":"ASPIC-consortium. Deliverable D2.5: Draft formal semantics for ASPIC system, June 2005."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.2","unstructured":"Besnard Ph Doutre S. Checking the acceptability of a set of arguments. In: Delgrande J. P. Schaub T. , editors. Proceedings 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR04). 2004. p. 59-64."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.3","unstructured":"Caminada M. Podlaszewski M. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA'12). 2012. A persuasion dialogue for grounded semantics; p. 105-116."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.4","unstructured":"Caminada M. Wu Y. On the limitations of abstract argumentation. In: de Causmaecker P. Maervoet J. Messelis T. Verbeeck K. Vermeulen T. , editors. Proceedings of the 23rd Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2011). 2011. p. 59-66."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.5","unstructured":"Caminada M. W. A. For the Sake of the Argument. Explorations into Argument-based Reasoning. Doctoral dissertation Free University Amsterdam; 2004."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caminada M. W. A. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fischer M. van der Hoek W. Konev B. Lisitsa A. , editors. Logics in Artificial Intelligence; 10th European Conference, JELIA 2006. Springer; 2006. p. 111-123. LNAI 4160.","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.7","unstructured":"Caminada M. W. A. Semi-stable semantics. In: Dunne P. E. Bench-Capon T. J. M. , editors. Computational Models of Argument; Proceedings of COMMA 2006. IOS Press; 2006. p. 121-130."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.8","unstructured":"Caminada M. W. A. Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager. In: Dastani M. M. de Jong E. , editors. Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2007). 2007. p. 81-87."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2006.04.001"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.10","unstructured":"Caminada M. W. A. An algorithm for stage semantics. In: Giacomin M. Baroni P. Cerutti F. Simari G. R. , editors. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010). IOS Press; 2010. p. 147-158."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.515036"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9218-x"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzn029"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3975(98)00200-X"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3975(96)80707-9"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00261-8"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.20","unstructured":"Dunne P. E. Doutre Sylvie Bench-Capon Trevor . Discovering inconsistencies through examination dialogues. In: Kaelbling L. P. Saffiotti A. , editors. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05). 2005."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dunne P. E. Wooldridge M. Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Rahwan I. Simari G. R. , editors. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer; 2009. p. 85-104.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_5"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.10.001"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.23","unstructured":"Hamblin C. L. Fallacies. Methuen; 1970."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1971.tb00065.x","article-title":"Mathematical models of dialogue","volume":"37","author":"Hamblin","year":"1971","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.2.215"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krabbe E. Formal dialectics as immanent criticism of philosophical systems. In: Barth E.M. Martens J.L. , editors. Argumentation Approaches to Theory Formation. John Benjamins; 1982. p. 233-243.","DOI":"10.1075\/slcs.8.85kra"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.27","unstructured":"Krabbe E. Studies in Dialogical Logic. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 1982. PhD thesis."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krentel M. W. The complexity of optimization problems. In: Hartmanis J. , editor. Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, May 28-30, 1986, Berkeley, California, USA. ACM; 1986. p. 69-76.","DOI":"10.1145\/12130.12138"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.29","unstructured":"Lorenz K. Die dialogische rechtfertigung der effectiven logic. In: Kambartel F. Mittelstrass J. , editors. Zum normativen Fundament der Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main; 1973. p. 250-280."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.30","unstructured":"Lorenzen P. Lorenz K. Dialogische Logik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 1978."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422","article-title":"Question-begging in non-cumulative systems","volume":"8","author":"Mackenzie","year":"1979","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370166","article-title":"Four dialogue systems","volume":"51","author":"Mackenzie","year":"1990","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Modgil S. Caminada M. W. A. Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Rahwan I. Simari G.R. , editors. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer; 2009. p. 105-129.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.34","unstructured":"Nelson L. De Socratische Methode. Uitgeverij Boom; 1994."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0000(91)90023-X"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.36","unstructured":"Perelman C. The Realm of Rhetoric. University of Notre Dame Press; 1982."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.37","unstructured":"Lysis P. Socratic Discourses by Plato and Xenophon. Rhys E. , editor. London: J.M. Dent & Sons ltd.; 1910."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.38","unstructured":"Plato . Sophist. 360BC."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90103-5"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pollock J. L. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press; 1995.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.43","unstructured":"Robinson R. Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford University Press; 1962."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1016217224647"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.46","unstructured":"Verheij B. Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In: Meyer J.-J.Ch. van der Gaag L.C. , editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (NAIC'96). 1996. p. 357-368."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.47","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G. A. W. Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. 1993. PhD thesis at Free University of Amsterdam."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G. A. W. Prakken H. Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-00). Springer; 2000. Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics; p. 239-253. number 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-40006-0_17"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton D. Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2007.","DOI":"10.1075\/cvs.5"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.51","unstructured":"Walton D. N. Krabbe E. C. W. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press; 1995. SUNY Series in Logic and Language."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1257.52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9210-5"}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic and Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-pdf\/26\/4\/1257\/7948656\/exu005.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,15]],"date-time":"2020-08-15T10:43:30Z","timestamp":1597488210000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu005"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,25]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1093\/logcom\/exu005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0955-792X","1465-363X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0955-792X","type":"print"},{"value":"1465-363X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]}}}