{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:21:15Z","timestamp":1760170875398},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Logic Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,14]],"date-time":"2014-02-14T02:55:08Z","timestamp":1392346508000},"page":"1293-1313","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Ringo","family":"Baumann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Woltran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23963-2_11"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.11.005"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni P. Giacomin M. Semantics of abstract argument systems. In: Rahwan I. Simari G. R. , editors. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer; 2009. p. 25-44.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_2"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20895-9_6"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.08.004"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.8","first-page":"127","article-title":"What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'12)","volume":"242","author":"Baumann","year":"2012"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.9","first-page":"75","article-title":"Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results","volume-title":"Conference on Computational Models of Argument","volume":"216","author":"Baumann","year":"2010"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_2"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-30743-0_5","article-title":"Parameterized splitting: a simple modification-based approach","volume-title":"Correct Reasoning - Essays on Logic-Based AI in Honour of Vladimir Lifschitz","volume":"7625","author":"Baumann","year":"2012"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_2","article-title":"Splitting argumentation frameworks: an empirical evaluation","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","volume":"7132","author":"Baumann","year":"2011"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Besnard P. Hunter A. Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press; 2008.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2007.06.012"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.16","unstructured":"Caminada M. Contamination in formal argumentation systems. In: Verbeeck K. Tuyls K. Now\u00e9 A. Manderick B. Kuijpers B. , editors. Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belie voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten; 2005. p. 59-65."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.17","unstructured":"Caminada M. Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2007). 2007. Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager; p. 81-87."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exr033"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.22","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k W. Computational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation. Technische Universit\u00e4t Wien; 2012. PhD Thesis."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.23","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k W. Gaggl S. A. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning. 2012. Incorporating stage semantics in the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.24","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k W. J\u00e4rvisalo M. Wallner J. P. Woltran S. Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation. In: Brewka G. Eiter T. McIlraith S. A. , editors. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2012). AAAI Press; 2012. p. 54-64."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.25","first-page":"261","article-title":"Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics","volume-title":"Conference on Computational Models of Argument","volume":"245","author":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2012"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.3318","article-title":"On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics","volume":"41","author":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR)"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-22152-1_4","article-title":"Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets","volume-title":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","volume":"6716","author":"Gaggl","year":"2011"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gaggl S. A. Woltran S. The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited. Journal of Logic Computation 2013. To appear.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exs011"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.29","first-page":"275","article-title":"Base logics in argumentation","volume-title":"Conference on Computational Models of Argument","volume":"216","author":"Hunter","year":"2010"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.2.215"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/383779.383783"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.disc.2011.02.029"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exq054"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.06.003"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahwan I. Simari G. R. , editors. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer; 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0"},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.37","unstructured":"Verheij B. Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In: Meyer J.-J.Ch. van der Gaag L.C. , editors. International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning workshop. Utrecht University; 1996. p. 357-368."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.38","unstructured":"Villata S. Meta-Argumentation for Multiagent Systems: coalition Formation, Merging Views, Subsumption Relation and Dependence Networks. Universit\u00e1 degli Studi di Torino; 2010. PhD Thesis."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.39","unstructured":"Weydert E. Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2011. Semi-stable extensions for infinite frameworks; p. 336-343."},{"key":"2016072605081221000_26.4.1293.40","unstructured":"Wooldridge M. Dunne P. E. Parsons S. National Conference on Artificial intelligence. AAAI Press; 2006. On the complexity of linking deductive and abstract argument systems; p. 299-304."}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic and Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-pdf\/26\/4\/1293\/7950532\/exu010.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,7]],"date-time":"2019-08-07T16:33:52Z","timestamp":1565195632000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/logcom\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,13]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,25]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1093\/logcom\/exu010"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0955-792X","1465-363X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0955-792X","type":"print"},{"value":"1465-363X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,13]]}}}