{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T20:06:26Z","timestamp":1791057986677,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709769600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"funder":[{"name":"Barnes Jewish Foundation Grant"},{"name":"REDCap"},{"name":"Clinical and Translational Science Award","award":["UL1 TR000448"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UL1 TR000448"]}]},{"name":"Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center"},{"name":"NCI Cancer Center","award":["P30 CA091842"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["P30 CA091842"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"NIH","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction after mastectomy has gained increasing popularity. While concerns over ischemic complications related to tension on the mastectomy flap persist, newer techniques and technologies have enhanced safety of this technique.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of DTI and 2-stage tissue expander (TE) reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A prospective cohort design was utilized to compare the incidence of reconstructive failure among patients undergoing DTI and TE reconstruction by unadjusted bivariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses. Secondary clinical outcomes of interest included specific complications requiring intervention (infection, seroma, hematoma, mastectomy flap necrosis, incisional dehiscence, device exposure) and time to final drain removal. Patient-reported outcomes on BREAST-Q were also compared.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A total of 134 patients (257 breasts) underwent DTI reconstruction and 222 patients (405 breasts) received TEs. DTI patients were significantly younger with lower BMIs; less diabetes, hypertension, and smoking; and smaller breast sizes; they also underwent more nipple-sparing mastectomies with prepectoral reconstructions. Rates of any complication (18% DTI vs 24% TE, P = .047), reconstructive failure (5.1% vs 12%, P = .004), and seroma (3.9% vs 11%, P &amp;lt; .001) were significantly lower in the DTI cohort on unadjusted analyses; however, there were no significant differences on adjusted regressions. Patient-reported satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were more substantively improved with DTI reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Prepectoral DTI reconstruction is a viable option for postmastectomy reconstruction in carefully selected patients, with no significant increase in reconstructive failure or other complications.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Level of Evidence: 2<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p\/>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjae054","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,6]],"date-time":"2024-03-06T06:32:39Z","timestamp":1709706759000},"page":"839-849","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Placement in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Sarah N","family":"Chiang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandra M","family":"Keane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph G","family":"Ribaudo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Tao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie A","family":"Margenthaler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marissa M","family":"Tenenbaum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9712-6181","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Terence M","family":"Myckatyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjad354","article-title":"Aesthetic plastic surgery national databank statistics 2022","volume":"43","year":"2023","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B2","author":"Plastic Surgery Statistics Report"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cps.2022.11.003","article-title":"Direct to implant reconstruction","volume":"50","author":"Jacobs","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Plast Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000005519","article-title":"An algorithmic approach to prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: version 2.0","volume":"143","author":"Antony","year":"2019","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1697028","article-title":"Update in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction","volume":"33","author":"Perdanasari","year":"2019","journal-title":"Semin Plast Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0b013e3182250c60","article-title":"One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction","volume":"69","author":"Cassileth","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"5 Suppl 2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95S","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318262e1a1","article-title":"Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction","volume":"130","author":"Salzberg","year":"2012","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000001749","article-title":"A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis of outcomes following direct-to-implant versus conventional two-stage implant reconstruction","volume":"136","author":"Basta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1 Pt A","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2022.04.011","article-title":"Seldom one and done: characterizing rates of reoperation with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy","volume":"224","author":"Hammond","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000001517","article-title":"Direct-to-implant as a frontline option for immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study with 2-stage reconstruction","volume":"81","author":"Han","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000003748","article-title":"Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander\/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective, multicenter study","volume":"140","author":"Srinivasa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000004498","article-title":"Nipple-sparing mastectomy incisions for cancer extirpation prospective cohort trial: perfusion, complications, and patient outcomes","volume":"142","author":"Odom","year":"2018","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7751","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-022-12110-1","article-title":"Individualized risk prediction tool for serious wound complications after mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction","volume":"29","author":"Nickel","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.41.4.1149","article-title":"Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses","volume":"41","author":"Faul","year":"2009","journal-title":"Behav Res Methods"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-196605000-00011","article-title":"Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy and replacement by the Cronin silastic mammary prosthesis","volume":"37","author":"Kelly AP","year":"1966","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1097\/00006534-197812000-00004","article-title":"Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction","volume":"62","author":"Schlenker","year":"1978","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2013.12.040","article-title":"The ability of intra-operative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography to predict mastectomy flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: a prospective trial","volume":"67","author":"Munabi","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000002028","article-title":"Single-stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a comparison between subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement","volume":"84","author":"Manrique","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e760","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000000716","article-title":"Surgical delay of the nipple-areolar complex in high-risk nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction","volume":"4","author":"Martinovic","year":"2016","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2940","DOI":"10.1097\/gox.0000000000002940","article-title":"The hybrid delay: a new approach for nipple-sparing mastectomy in macromastia","volume":"8","author":"Jensen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plastic Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1707","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-022-03136-7","article-title":"Revision rate of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: is it truly a single-stage reconstruction? A single-surgeon experience","volume":"47","author":"Adler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000001220","article-title":"Surgeon-controlled comparison of direct-to-implant and 2-stage tissue expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction outcomes","volume":"80","author":"Azouz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1170","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6","article-title":"Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs","volume":"128","author":"Colwell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.3109\/2000656x.2013.767202","article-title":"Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications","volume":"47","author":"Davila","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Plast Surg Hand Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(16)30668-4","article-title":"Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial","volume":"18","author":"Dikmans","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.389","article-title":"Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients","volume":"217","author":"Fischer","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.13113","article-title":"Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits","volume":"24","author":"Gschwantler-Kaulich","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1098","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2014.05.020","article-title":"Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome","volume":"67","author":"Lardi","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2019.11.008","article-title":"Single stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction has lower complication rates than tissue expander and implant and comparable rates to autologous reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation","volume":"106","author":"Naoum","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000001893","article-title":"Direct-to-implant and 2-stage breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy: results of a retrospective comparison","volume":"83","author":"Pallara","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000003259","article-title":"Direct-to-implant versus 2-stage breast reconstruction: which technique is better? An analysis of 104 patients at a single institution","volume":"89","author":"Piper","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"909e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31824ec411","article-title":"Comparison of immediate implant placement versus the staged tissue expander technique in breast reconstruction","volume":"129","author":"Roostaeian","year":"2012","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000000803","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in immediate single-stage versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction","volume":"135","author":"Susarla","year":"2015","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1097\/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75","article-title":"Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends","volume":"133","author":"Colwell","year":"2014","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000002428","article-title":"Is single-stage prosthetic reconstruction cost effective? A cost-utility analysis for the use of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction relative to expander-implant reconstruction in postmastectomy patients","volume":"138","author":"Krishnan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000010156","article-title":"Immediate post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction: an outpatient procedure?","volume":"152","author":"Keane","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1s Suppl 1","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S78","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000003114","article-title":"Long-term complications and patient-reported outcomes after alloplastic breast reconstruction","volume":"88","author":"Lee","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.3109\/2000656x.2014.899240","article-title":"Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1612 cases from the ACS-NSQIP surgical outcomes database","volume":"48","author":"Wink","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Plast Surg Hand Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-020-05722-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes","volume":"182","author":"Abbate","year":"2020","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2022.02.019","article-title":"Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"75","author":"Ching","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2019.05.015","article-title":"Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: a systematic review and meta analysis","volume":"45","author":"Li","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000002190","article-title":"Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis","volume":"85","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0b013e31823f3cd9","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction","volume":"68","author":"Ho","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318230c29e","article-title":"Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity","volume":"128","author":"Sbitany","year":"2011","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1547","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2018.06.012","article-title":"Human acellular dermis increases surgical site infection and overall complication profile when compared with submuscular breast reconstruction: an updated meta-analysis incorporating new products(\u2730)","volume":"71","author":"Smith","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-015-0555-z","article-title":"A meta-analysis of postoperative complications of tissue expander\/implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix","volume":"39","author":"Zhao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0b013e3181dba892","article-title":"The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander\/implant breast reconstruction","volume":"64","author":"Lanier","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1735","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181bf803d","article-title":"Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes","volume":"124","author":"Sbitany","year":"2009","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000003505","article-title":"Quality-of-life outcomes improve with nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction","volume":"140","author":"Bailey","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(18)30378-4","article-title":"Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial","volume":"19","author":"Negenborn","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024102112480629900_sjae054-B51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-020-02007-3","article-title":"Sub-muscular reconstruction after NAC sparing mastectomy: direct to implant breast reconstruction with human ADM versus tissue expander","volume":"45","author":"Sgarzani","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"}],"container-title":["Aesthetic Surgery Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/asj\/sjae054\/57243138\/sjae054.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article-pdf\/44\/8\/839\/59930102\/sjae054.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article-pdf\/44\/8\/839\/59930102\/sjae054.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,21]],"date-time":"2024-10-21T12:48:26Z","timestamp":1729514906000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article\/44\/8\/839\/7624033"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/asj\/sjae054","relation":{},"ISSN":["1090-820X","1527-330X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1090-820X","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-330X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]}}}