{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,25]],"date-time":"2026-03-25T10:38:03Z","timestamp":1774435083088,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]],"date-time":"2024-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719187200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Cosmetic breast surgeries such as augmentation, mastopexy, and reduction are common aesthetic medical procedures for enhancing physical appearance. Despite their popularity, the influence of these surgeries on subsequent breast reconstruction for cancer patients remains underexplored.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In this study we sought to investigate the effects of previous cosmetic breast surgeries on the outcomes of breast reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2011 to May 2023. This analysis compared patients with histories of implant augmentation, breast reduction, mastopexy, and augmentation mastopexy with those receiving reconstruction without any cosmetic surgery history. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, revisions, and BREAST-Q surveys were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, with significance set at P &amp;lt; .05.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The study included 124 patients (50 autologous, 74 implant) with a history of cosmetic breast surgery (102 implant augmentations, 17 breast reductions, 5 mastopexies, and 9 augmentation mastopexies). They were analyzed in comparison with 1307 patients (683 autologous, 624 implant) without previous cosmetic breast surgery. Patients with previous cosmetic surgeries showed a higher incidence of hematoma with tissue expander placement. A preference for implant-based reconstruction was more common among patients with an augmentation history (P &amp;lt; .001), whereas autologous reconstruction was more common in those with a history of breast reduction (P = .047). Patients with a history of breast augmentation had on average significantly more breast revisions (P &amp;lt; .05).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In this study we demonstrate a significantly higher hematoma rate and number of revisions in patients with previous cosmetic breast surgery when compared to patients without a history of cosmetic surgery. Furthermore, we suggest that types of cosmetic breast surgery influence the decision-making process regarding implant vs autologous reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Level of Evidence: 4<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p\/>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjae138","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]],"date-time":"2024-06-24T16:11:25Z","timestamp":1719245485000},"page":"1300-1308","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Long-term Implications of Cosmetic Breast Surgeries on Subsequent Breast Reconstruction"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Langfeier","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sumeet S","family":"Teotia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nicholas T","family":"Haddock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cps.2015.03.010","article-title":"Primary breast augmentation with fat grafting","volume":"42","author":"Coleman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Plast Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000006510","article-title":"Recent advances in implant-based breast reconstruction","volume":"145","author":"Colwell","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B3","volume-title":"StatPearls","author":"Fardo","year":"2023"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e31829fe4b4","article-title":"Mastopexy","volume":"132","author":"Hidalgo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000000033","article-title":"Breast augmentation","volume":"133","author":"Hidalgo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjx181","article-title":"Mastopexy and mastopexy-augmentation","volume":"38","author":"Qureshi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1080\/1744666x.2022.2010546","article-title":"Breast implant illness: scientific evidence of its existence","volume":"18","author":"Cohen Tervaert","year":"2022","journal-title":"Expert Rev Clin Immunol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.21037\/gs-20-231","article-title":"Breast implant illness: a topic in review","volume":"10","author":"Kaplan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000000293","article-title":"Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following total skin-sparing mastectomy in women with a history of augmentation mammaplasty: assessing the safety profile","volume":"134","author":"Sbitany","year":"2014","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1585","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181cb6351","article-title":"Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques","volume":"125","author":"Yueh","year":"2010","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000002664","article-title":"Autologous breast reconstruction trends in the United States: using the nationwide inpatient sample database","volume":"87","author":"Masoomi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4180","DOI":"10.1097\/gox.0000000000004180","article-title":"Implant-based versus autologous reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Broyles","year":"2022","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181da87a6","article-title":"Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction","volume":"126","author":"Visser","year":"2010","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181aee807","article-title":"Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q","volume":"124","author":"Pusic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2008.08.010","article-title":"Research electronic data capture (REDCap)\u2013a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support","volume":"42","author":"Harris","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B16","author":"IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.11613\/bm.2013.018","article-title":"The chi-square test of independence","volume":"23","author":"McHugh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000006317","article-title":"Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients","volume":"145","author":"Voineskos","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2040-1368","article-title":"Comparative study of DIEP and PAP flaps in breast reconstruction: reconstructive outcomes and fat necrosis","volume":"39","author":"Kim","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Reconstr Microsurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369e","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000005906","article-title":"Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single-center experience","volume":"144","author":"Haddock","year":"2019","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1S1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1097\/01.Gox.0001006112.23596.81","article-title":"DIEP flap vs PAP flap vs LAP flap: a propensity matched analysis of aesthetic outcomes, complications, and satisfaction","volume":"12","author":"Lakatta","year":"2024","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000003553","article-title":"101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: lessons learned with our early experience","volume":"140","author":"Haddock","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4S","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3S","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000010490","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction in low body mass index patients: beyond the standard DIEP flap","volume":"152","author":"Haddock","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000011327","article-title":"Outcomes of immediate versus delayed autologous reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy: a meta-analysis","author":"ElAbd","year":"2024","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2681","DOI":"10.1097\/gox.0000000000002681","article-title":"An individualized patient-centric approach and evolution towards total autologous free flap breast reconstruction in an academic setting","volume":"8","author":"Haddock","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1097\/sap.0000000000002583","article-title":"Does prior breast augmentation affect outcomes after mastectomy with reconstruction? An analysis of postoperative complications and reoperations","volume":"86","author":"Hammond","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318254b3bc","article-title":"The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life","volume":"130","author":"McCarthy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011029","article-title":"Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life in patients with breast augmentation: a follow-up of six months","author":"Luong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1748649","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes after subpectoral breast augmentation with microtextured or macrotextured implants using the BREAST-Q","volume":"49","author":"Leite","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Plast Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1097\/prs.0000000000004196","article-title":"Breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty: a case-control study","volume":"141","author":"Sosin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024111514150335000_sjae138-B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asj.2008.02.008","article-title":"Considerations of previous augmentation in subsequent breast reconstruction","volume":"28","author":"Spear","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"}],"container-title":["Aesthetic Surgery Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/asj\/sjae138\/58732201\/sjae138.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article-pdf\/44\/12\/1300\/60682987\/sjae138.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article-pdf\/44\/12\/1300\/60682987\/sjae138.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T14:15:10Z","timestamp":1731680110000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/article\/44\/12\/1300\/7697876"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/asj\/sjae138","relation":{},"ISSN":["1090-820X","1527-330X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1090-820X","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-330X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]}}}