{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T17:03:00Z","timestamp":1790787780688,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788998400000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prepectoral breast reconstruction reduces postoperative morbidity and eliminates animation deformity. Although acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh have traditionally been utilized to stabilize prepectoral implants, emerging evidence has questioned their value and highlighted their association with postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study presents a single-surgeon experience using 4-micron surface implants without ADM or mesh in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This is a prospective, single-center, single-surgeon study involving patients who underwent immediate prepectoral, breast reconstruction using Motiva Ergonomix2 implants, between September 2023 and March 2025. Early and mid-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient-reported satisfaction (BREAST-Q) were analyzed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 210 consecutive patients (349 breasts) underwent this surgical procedure with a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-21 months). Early complications occurred in 26.1% of breasts, most commonly incision dehiscence (5.2%), hematoma (3.7%), and partial nipple\u2013areola complex necrosis (2.9%). Capsular contracture (Grade III-IV) occurred in 7.7% and implant rippling in 6%. Twenty-eight breasts (8%) required unplanned reoperation. Total implant loss occurred in 1.1% of breasts. Cosmetic outcomes (n = 143) were rated \u201cexcellent\u201d or \u201cgood\u201d in &amp;gt;75% of cases, approaching 92% in bilateral prophylactic mastectomies. BREAST-Q responses (n = 129) demonstrated a postoperative breast satisfaction score of 64.96% and implant satisfaction of 6.6\/8.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This technique demonstrates low complication and implant loss rates, satisfactory aesthetic results, and high patient-reported satisfaction. These findings support Ergonomix2 implants as a safe, biocompatible, and potentially cost-effective option for prepectoral reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence: 2 (Therapeutic)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p\/>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjag191","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T11:48:52Z","timestamp":1788954532000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrice or Mesh: A Prospective Single-Surgeon Series of 210 Patients and 349 Breasts"],"prefix":"10.1093","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7156-0684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Burcu","family":"Celet Ozden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gamze","family":"Ayta\u015f Sevindik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nilufer","family":"Yildirim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cem","family":"Yilmaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hasan","family":"Karanlik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3095-6524","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tugba","family":"Gun Koplay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Igci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/JCM13237407","article-title":"The evolution of implant-based breast reconstruction: innovations, trends, and future directions","volume":"13","author":"Amro","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.12701\/YUJM.2019.00283","article-title":"Prepectoral breast reconstruction","volume":"36","author":"Kim","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Yeungnam Med Sci"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22S","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004047","article-title":"Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a comparison between prepectoral and partial subpectoral techniques","volume":"140","author":"Nahabedian","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1542","DOI":"10.1016\/J.EJSO.2019.05.015","article-title":"Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: a systematic review and meta analysis","volume":"45","author":"Li","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1245\/S10434-022-12567-0","article-title":"Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a systemic review and meta-analysis","volume":"30","author":"Ostapenko","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1093\/ASJ\/SJAE238","article-title":"Use of 801 acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a clinical observation of complication profiles over a 7-year period","volume":"45","author":"Kaplan","year":"2025","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/CUREUS.84745","article-title":"Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using TIGR\u00ae matrix surgical mesh: clinical outcomes from our first 100 procedures","volume":"17","author":"Caddia","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004798","article-title":"Comparing polyurethane and acellular dermal matrix implant cover in prepectoral breast reconstruction: short-term complications","volume":"11","author":"Correia-Pinto","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2024.01.025","article-title":"Impact of polyurethane versus acellular dermal matrix coating on prepectoral reconstruction outcomes: interface does matter","volume":"91","author":"Correia-Pinto","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011370","article-title":"American Association of Plastic Surgeons consensus on breast implant\u2013associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma","volume":"154","author":"Clemens","year":"2024","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1080\/23320885.2017.1407658","article-title":"Nanotechnology, nanosurfaces and silicone gel breast implants: current aspects","volume":"4","author":"Munhoz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4351","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-024-03994-3","article-title":"Advancements in aesthetic breast augmentation: evaluating the safety, efficacy, and naturalistic outcomes of Ergonomix2 implants","volume":"48","author":"Szychta","year":"2024","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1038\/s41551-021-00739-4","article-title":"The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans","volume":"5","author":"Doloff","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat Biomed Eng"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-018-1234-7","article-title":"Bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on textured breast implant shell materials","volume":"43","author":"James","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"NP102","DOI":"10.1093\/ASJ\/SJAC264","article-title":"Our experience using round nano-surface ergonomix implants for breast reconstruction: a single-center retrospective study","volume":"43","author":"Adelson","year":"2023","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2023.01.047","article-title":"A single surgeon's experience with Motiva Ergonomix round SilkSurface silicone implants in breast reconstruction over a 5-year period","volume":"80","author":"Kaplan","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.3978\/J.ISSN.2227-684X.2015.08.01","article-title":"Preoperative digital mammography imaging in conservative mastectomy and immediate reconstruction","volume":"5","author":"Rancati","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B18","first-page":"311","article-title":"Rippling associated with pre-pectoral implant based breast reconstruction: a new grading system","volume":"8","author":"Vidya","year":"2019","journal-title":"World J Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2012.05.012","article-title":"BCCT.core\u2014can a computer program be used for the assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery?","volume":"21","author":"Preuss","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5067","DOI":"10.1007\/S00266-026-05901-4","article-title":"Prepectoral breast reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants: a 117-patient single-center study with objective cosmetic evaluation","volume":"50","author":"Kurt","year":"2026","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000007391","article-title":"Validation of the BCCT.core software for objective aesthetic evaluation following bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction","volume":"14","author":"Carlson","year":"2026","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563E","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000009984","article-title":"Immediate breast cancer reconstruction with or without dermal matrix or synthetic mesh support: a review and network meta-analysis","volume":"151","author":"Murphy","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1245\/S10434-015-4873-9","article-title":"Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis","volume":"23","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0B013E31823F3CD9","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction","volume":"68","author":"Ho","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.3109\/2000656X.2013.766202","article-title":"The effect of acellular dermal matrix on drain secretions after immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction","volume":"47","author":"Israeli Ben-Noon","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Plast Surg Hand Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B26","article-title":"A systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction","volume":"14","author":"Phillips","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eplasty"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B27","article-title":"Complications following expander\/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"11","author":"Hoppe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eplasty"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1089\/whr.2023.0106","article-title":"Importance of breast sensation after mastectomy: evidence from three sources","volume":"4","author":"Lindau","year":"2023","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Rep"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1001\/JAMASURG.2018.1677","article-title":"Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction","volume":"153","author":"Santosa","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B30","author":"CSPS"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1093\/ASJ\/SJAD301","article-title":"One-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with polyurethane-coated device: standardized assessment of outcomes","volume":"44","author":"Catanuto","year":"2024","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1177\/13506501221132897","article-title":"In vitro models of soft tissue damage by implant-associated frictional shear stresses","volume":"237","author":"Rosas","year":"2023","journal-title":"Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B33","author":"Establishment Labs"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/S00266-019-01595-Z","article-title":"Why do we need anatomical implants? The science and rationale for maintaining their availability and use in breast surgery","volume":"44","author":"Montemurro","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjaa128","article-title":"Comprehensive comparison between shaped versus round implants for breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"41","author":"Han","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1093\/ASJ\/SJX210","article-title":"The effect of implant type on nipple position geometry and aesthetics following tissue expander reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy","volume":"38","author":"Dorfman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000003238","article-title":"Shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of surgical and patient-reported outcomes","volume":"139","author":"Khavanin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011001","article-title":"Replacement of shaped textured implants with round smooth implants in breast reconstruction: long-term outcomes","volume":"154","author":"Ayyala","year":"2024","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/J.EJSO.2025.110707","article-title":"Short term outcomes of nano-textured implants without ADM in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction","volume":"51","author":"Gashi","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e37","DOI":"10.1016\/J.CLBC.2022.11.007","article-title":"Improving decision-making in prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy: the key role of flap thickness ratio","volume":"23","author":"Pagliara","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Breast Cancer"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17116\/ONKOLOG20251406154","article-title":"One-step DTI reconstruction using nanotextured implants in breast cancer patients. Direct results","volume":"14","author":"Troshenkov","year":"2025","journal-title":"PA Herzen J Oncol"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000009618","article-title":"Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without placement of acellular dermal matrix or mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy","volume":"150","author":"Urban","year":"2022","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2026093012333459500_sjag191-B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002845","article-title":"Staged suprapectoral expander\/implant reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix following nipple-sparing mastectomy","volume":"139","author":"Salibian","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["Aesthetic Surgery Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/asj\/sjag191\/71022048\/sjag191.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/asj\/sjag191\/71022048\/sjag191.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T16:33:48Z","timestamp":1790786028000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/asj\/advance-article\/doi\/10.1093\/asj\/sjag191\/8790141"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"references-count":43,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/asj\/sjag191","relation":{},"ISSN":["1090-820X","1527-330X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1090-820X","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-330X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"article-number":"sjag191"}}