{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,19]],"date-time":"2026-03-19T23:25:57Z","timestamp":1773962757224,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,1]],"date-time":"2009-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1230768000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,4]],"date-time":"2017-12-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1512345600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":3259,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bjanaesthesia.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["British Journal of Anaesthesia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,5]],"date-time":"2008-11-05T21:24:41Z","timestamp":1225920281000},"page":"97-103","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Urinary catheterization in labour with high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"102","author":[{"given":"M.J.A.","family":"Wilson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"MacArthur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Shennan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib1","article-title":"Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour","volume":"2","author":"Howell","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2000.01720.x","article-title":"National obstetric anesthetic practice in the UK 1997\/1998","volume":"55","author":"Khor","year":"2000","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1999.00894.x","article-title":"A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom","volume":"54","author":"Burnstein","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(95)92602-X","article-title":"Randomised comparison of combined spinal\u2013epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour","volume":"345","author":"Collis","year":"1995","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)05251-X","article-title":"The Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial: effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery","volume":"358","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02610-3","article-title":"Post-partum urinary retention: a comparison between two methods of epidural analgesia","volume":"71.1","author":"Olofsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123609","article-title":"Factors that are associated with clinically overt post-partum urinary retention after vaginal delivery","volume":"187.2","author":"Carley","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib8","first-page":"44","article-title":"Persistent post-partum urinary retention in contemporary obstetric practice. Definition, prevalence and clinical implications","volume":"46.1","author":"Groutz","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1054\/ijoa.2002.0951","article-title":"The effect of epidural analgesia on post-partum urinary retention in women who deliver vaginally","volume":"11.3","author":"Liang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02610-3","article-title":"Post-partum urinary retention: a comparison between two methods of epidural analgesia","volume":"71.1","author":"Olofsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-289X(02)00097-3","article-title":"Impact study of the introduction of low-dose epidural (bupivacaine 0.1%\/fentanyl 2 mcg\/ml) compared with bupivacaine 0.25% for labour analgesia","volume":"12","author":"Hart","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802127554","article-title":"Labour as a bacteruric event-assessment and risk factors","volume":"21","author":"Elram","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1093\/bja\/aen313_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200212000-00032","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing traditional with two \u2018mobile\u2019 epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy","volume":"97","author":"Wilson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000709121734076X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000709121734076X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bja\/article-pdf\/102\/1\/97\/19567962\/aen313.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,22]],"date-time":"2022-10-22T07:20:14Z","timestamp":1666423214000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000709121734076X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S000709121734076X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aen313","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.1156975.617050","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0007-0912"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-0912","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Urinary catheterization in labour with high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aen313","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2009 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}