{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T11:07:53Z","timestamp":1782126473206,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]],"date-time":"2025-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764374400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO) is increasingly used for oesophageal cancer surgery, yet its adoption may have outpaced structured evaluation. This systematic review assessed RAMIO\u2019s development through the IDEAL framework and synthesized evidence from RCTs and long-term studies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on 1 June 2025 for studies comparing RAMIO with open oesophagectomy or minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Non-comparative, non-English, protocol, and review articles were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, classifying studies according to IDEAL stages. Outcomes were presented in a narrative overview. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for long-term studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022352208).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 104 studies involving 133 107 patients published between 2002 and 2025 were included. Of these, 86 were IDEAL stage 2B, four stage 3 (RCTs), and 14 stage 4 (long-term follow up studies). Generally, RAMIO research followed the IDEAL pathway, although several stage 4 studies preceded stage 3 evaluations. None explicitly referenced the IDEAL framework. RCTs demonstrated some benefits of RAMIO, including fewer complications and faster recovery, whereas long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Studies on long-term outcomes varied in design and were often at risk of bias.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>RAMIO may offer perioperative benefits, but high-quality evidence is limited. Few RCTs exist, and long-term benefits are unclear. Although RAMIO development aligns broadly with IDEAL stages, explicit framework adherence is lacking. Future trials should adopt structured IDEAL-guided designs and standardised reporting.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaf265","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,15]],"date-time":"2025-11-15T12:59:29Z","timestamp":1763211569000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Implementation and effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO): a systematic review using the IDEAL framework"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"112","author":[{"given":"Gino M","family":"Kuiper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lianne","family":"Triemstra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robin B","family":"den Boer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Franco","family":"Badaloni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]},{"name":"Oesophageal Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundaci\u00f3n Favaloro , Buenos Aires ,","place":["Argentina"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Janneke P C","family":"Grutters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maroeska","family":"Rovers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7134-261X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Richard","family":"van Hillegersberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jelle P","family":"Ruurda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht ,","place":["The Netherlands"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B1","first-page":"229","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"74","author":"Bray","year":"2024","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2383","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31462-9","article-title":"Esophageal cancer","volume":"390","author":"Lagergren","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/nyas.13677","article-title":"Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in the era of multimodality management","volume":"1434","author":"Borggreve","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-019-07273-3","article-title":"Early outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study","volume":"26","author":"Zhang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1159\/000497456","article-title":"Minimally invasive esophagectomy","volume":"37","author":"van der Sluis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2004.02.014","article-title":"The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy","volume":"127","author":"Kernstine","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0674-8","article-title":"First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer","volume":"20","author":"van Hillegersberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-001-8192-9","article-title":"Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery","volume":"16","author":"Melvin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6647","article-title":"Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer","volume":"96","author":"Boone","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003031","article-title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer","volume":"269","author":"van der Sluis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61086-2","article-title":"Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation","volume":"374","author":"Ergina","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f3012","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f3012","article-title":"IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages","volume":"346","author":"McCulloch","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002794","article-title":"No surgical innovation without evaluation","volume":"269","author":"Hirst","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h2147","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h2147","article-title":"The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose","volume":"350","author":"Loudon","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2018.08.039","article-title":"Does the approach matter? Comparing survival in robotic, minimally invasive, and open esophagectomies","volume":"107","author":"Espinoza-Mercado","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezaa336","article-title":"National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic esophagectomy following induction chemoradiation therapy: a National Cancer Database propensity-matched analysis","volume":"59","author":"Kamel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2812","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-11082-y","article-title":"Robotic techniques in esophagogastric cancer surgery: an assessment of short- and long-term clinical outcomes","volume":"29","author":"Kamarajah","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4018","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09588-x","article-title":"Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer","volume":"37","author":"Byiringiro","year":"2023","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1833","DOI":"10.1177\/00031348221078962","article-title":"Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival compared to open surgery","volume":"89","author":"Ising","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2017.04.065","article-title":"Survival after esophagectomy: a propensity-matched study of different surgical approaches","volume":"104","author":"Weksler","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-012-1538-8","article-title":"Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes","volume":"36","author":"Suda","year":"2012","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2050.2011.01246.x","article-title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy","volume":"25","author":"Weksler","year":"2012","journal-title":"Dis Esophagus"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005023","article-title":"Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma","volume":"275","author":"Yang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"znae143","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znae143","article-title":"Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (REVATE trial)","volume":"111","author":"Chao","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B28","first-page":"AT10327","article-title":"Efficacy and perioperative safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer","author":"Ma","year":"2024","journal-title":"Altern Ther Health Med"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2020.09.027","article-title":"Two-year quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy","volume":"112","author":"Vimolratana","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2021.03.018","article-title":"Similar quality of life after conventional and robotic transhiatal esophagectomy","volume":"113","author":"Williams","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-024-03310-2","article-title":"Long-term quality of life after hybrid robot-assisted and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single centre: a comparative analysis","volume":"409","author":"Neusch\u00fctz","year":"2024","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1602","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-06923-7","article-title":"Long-term health-related quality of life following robot-assisted radical transmediastinal esophagectomy","volume":"34","author":"Sugawara","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"doaa114","DOI":"10.1093\/dote\/doaa114","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study","volume":"34","author":"Xu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Dis Esophagus"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109591","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109591","article-title":"Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: propensity-score matched anaylsis","volume":"51","author":"Kwon","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"doaa079","DOI":"10.1093\/dote\/doaa079","article-title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial","volume":"33","author":"de Groot","year":"2020","journal-title":"Dis Esophagus"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2023.06.020","article-title":"Cost analysis of robot-assisted versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer. Results of the ROBOT randomized clinical trial","volume":"49","author":"Goense","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers16010112","article-title":"Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is safe and cost equivalent compared to minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral centre","volume":"16","author":"Knitter","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-023-02732-7","article-title":"The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring","volume":"30","author":"Marcus","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-021-08075-1","article-title":"Comparison of short-term outcomes between transthoracic and robot-assisted transmediastinal radical surgery for esophageal cancer: a prospective study","volume":"21","author":"Yoshimura","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2018.11.075","article-title":"Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy","volume":"108","author":"Sarkaria","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"zrac116","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrac116","article-title":"Quality of reporting of robot-assisted cholecystectomy in relation to the IDEAL recommendations: systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Kirkham","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-024-01534-1","article-title":"A systematic review on the effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy","volume":"27","author":"Triemstra","year":"2024","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.07.008","article-title":"Appraising the uptake and use of the IDEAL framework and recommendations: a review of the literature","volume":"57","author":"Khachane","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005782","article-title":"Robotic versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer","volume":"278","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3177","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14133177","article-title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Esagian","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-021-08780-x","article-title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)","volume":"21","author":"Tagkalos","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac191","article-title":"Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review","volume":"109","author":"Papadopoulou","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/s13629-025-00465-5","article-title":"Robotgeassisteerde chirurgie: wat zijn de implicaties voor het milieu?","volume":"15","author":"Jansen","year":"2025","journal-title":"Tijdschr Urol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-13-132","article-title":"Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider","volume":"13","author":"Williamson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0146444","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0146444","article-title":"Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey","volume":"11","author":"Gorst","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0283000","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0283000","article-title":"The RoboCOS Study: development of an international core outcome set for the comprehensive evaluation of patient, surgeon, organisational and population level impacts of robotic assisted surgery","volume":"18","author":"Robertson","year":"2023","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-024-16364-9","article-title":"The current state of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) esophageal registry","volume":"32","author":"Kooij","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e386","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004550","article-title":"Worldwide techniques and outcomes in Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE)","volume":"276","author":"Kingma","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025120907421926200_znaf265-B54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000006147","article-title":"Surgical techniques and related perioperative outcomes after Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy (RAMIG): results from the prospective multicenter international UGIRA gastric registry","volume":"280","author":"de Jongh","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/112\/12\/znaf265\/65817616\/znaf265.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/112\/12\/znaf265\/65817616\/znaf265.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T12:42:29Z","timestamp":1765284149000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/bjs\/znaf265\/8374691"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znaf265","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"article-number":"znaf265"}}