{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T15:52:40Z","timestamp":1791301960707,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791158400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100015250","name":"Bristol Biomedical Research Centre","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NIHR203315"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR203315"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100015250","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007155","name":"Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007155","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000276","name":"Department of Health and Social Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000276","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100020643","name":"MRC","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100020643","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000297","name":"Royal College of Surgeons of England","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000297","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000833","name":"Rosetrees Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000833","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Modifications to invasive procedures and devices are common during surgical innovation, yet reporting is frequently inconsistent and incomplete. The aim of this study was to develop a concise, stakeholder-informed checklist for reporting modifications in surgical innovation studies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A provisional checklist was developed from a systematic review of 104 IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term study) studies, identifying substantial heterogeneity and deficits in modification reporting. Twenty stakeholders were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews, including clinicians, methodologists, industry representatives, and governance professionals. Interviews explored views and subsequently optimized the checklist\u2019s content, wording, layout, scope, and usability. Data were analysed by thematic analysis and iteratively used to refine the checklist until no further required changes were identified.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Stakeholders endorsed the need for a dedicated modification reporting tool, emphasizing pragmatism and usability. Interview findings led to clarification of scope, refinement of terminology, and removal of ambiguous items. Greater emphasis was placed on describing the innovation\u2019s starting configuration, specifying the IDEAL stage, explicitly reporting both the presence and absence of modifications, and reflecting on procedural stability. Iterations condensed the checklist to a seven-item tool. The final Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool (SMART) specifies describing the starting point of the innovation, reporting modifications, and summarizing stability and shared learning.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>SMART is a concise, stakeholder-informed prepublication tool to guide prospective tracking and consistent reporting of modifications to innovative invasive procedures and devices. Used alongside the IDEAL framework, it has the potential to improve the quality and interpretability of surgical innovation research.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znag117","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T11:28:37Z","timestamp":1788521317000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Concise stakeholder-informed tool for reporting modifications to innovative surgical procedures and devices: Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool (SMART) checklist"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"113","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3082-8426","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James B","family":"Olivier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6606-5427","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rhiannon C","family":"Macefield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maeve","family":"Coyle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kerry N L","family":"Avery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalie S","family":"Blencowe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]},{"name":"Leeds Institute of Emergency General Surgery, St James\u2019s University Hospital , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daisy","family":"Elliott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.011","article-title":"Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons","volume":"206","author":"Biffl","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61083-7","article-title":"Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations","volume":"374","author":"Barkun","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61086-2","article-title":"Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation","volume":"374","author":"Ergina","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61116-8","article-title":"No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations","volume":"374","author":"McCulloch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i2372","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i2372","article-title":"IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices","volume":"353","author":"Sedrakyan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.29337\/ijsp.167","article-title":"Reporting modifications in surgical innovation: a systematic scoping review protocol","volume":"25","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Surg Protoc"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"zrad020","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrad020","article-title":"Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review","volume":"7","author":"Hossaini","year":"2023","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1004","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac223","article-title":"Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies","volume":"109","author":"Cousins","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.12968\/hmed.2022.0073","article-title":"Safety and transparency in surgical innovation","volume":"83","author":"Blazeby","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Hosp Med (Lond)"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x","article-title":"Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review","volume":"185","author":"Plint","year":"2006","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2016.04.032","article-title":"Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: a before and after study","volume":"30","author":"Agha","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.09.004","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"9","author":"Schulz","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0295864","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0295864","article-title":"Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993\u20132018","volume":"18","author":"Sewell","year":"2023","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.10.034","article-title":"The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines","volume":"84","author":"Agha","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000000373","article-title":"The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines","volume":"109","author":"Sohrabi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B18","first-page":"1241","article-title":"New reporting guidelines for IDEAL studies","volume":"107","author":"Bilbro","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004180","article-title":"The IDEAL reporting guidelines: a Delphi consensus statement stage specific recommendations for reporting the evaluation of surgical innovation","volume":"273","author":"Bilbro","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14380","article-title":"The IDEAL and the EQUATOR","volume":"20","author":"Smart","year":"2018","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B21"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002794","article-title":"No surgical innovation without evaluation evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations","volume":"269","author":"Hirst","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e029574","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-029574","article-title":"Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)","volume":"9","author":"Avery","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004975","article-title":"A core outcome set for seamless, standardized evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices (COHESIVE)","volume":"277","author":"Avery","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e097097","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-097097","article-title":"Identifying and reporting modifications to surgical innovation: a systematic review of IDEAL\/IDEAL-D studies","volume":"15","author":"Olivier","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000000388","article-title":"Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations","volume":"89","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1177\/1744987120927206","article-title":"Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples","volume":"25","author":"Campbell","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Res Nurs"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-013-0528-y","article-title":"Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research","volume":"42","author":"Palinkas","year":"2015","journal-title":"Adm Policy Ment Health"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e482","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005714","article-title":"What are patients told about innovative surgical procedures? A qualitative synthesis of 7 case studies in the United Kingdom","volume":"278","author":"Elliott","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1080\/13814788.2017.1375091","article-title":"Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis","volume":"24","author":"Moser","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.6999.251","article-title":"Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research","volume":"311","author":"Britten","year":"1995","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732316665344","article-title":"Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?","volume":"27","author":"Hennink","year":"2017","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfm006","article-title":"Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing","volume":"71","author":"Beatty","year":"2007","journal-title":"Public Opin Q"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1038\/bdj.2008.192","article-title":"Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups","volume":"204","author":"Gill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/17.1.71","article-title":"The \u2018doctor\u2019 or the \u2018girl from the University\u2019? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing","volume":"17","author":"Richards","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1080\/2159676X.2019.1628806","article-title":"Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis","volume":"11","author":"Braun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Qual Res Sport Exerc Health"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1800.2011.00558.x","article-title":"Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation","volume":"19","author":"Cruickshank","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nurs Inq"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmz084","article-title":"Using critical realism in primary care research: an overview of methods","volume":"37","author":"Sturgiss","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1177\/160940690600500107","article-title":"Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development","volume":"5","author":"Fereday","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Qual Methods"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B41","author":"Lumivero"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1080\/13814788.2017.1375092","article-title":"Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing","volume":"24","author":"Korstjens","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjmed-2022-000284","article-title":"Core outcome sets in medical research","volume":"1","author":"Kirkham","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000217","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000217","article-title":"Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines","volume":"7","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-023-00433-6","article-title":"Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines","volume":"9","author":"Petkovic","year":"2023","journal-title":"Res Involv Engagem"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20476","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0020476","article-title":"Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Boulkedid","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs5.50358","article-title":"Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL\/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set","volume":"4","author":"Macefield","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B48","first-page":"A8","article-title":"IDEAL-Physio: a new tool guiding innovation and evaluation of complex interventions and enacting the EBM-manifesto in physiotherapy","volume":"23","author":"Paez","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Evid Based Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2017.00059","article-title":"R-IDEAL: a framework for systematic clinical evaluation of technical innovations in radiation oncology","volume":"7","author":"Verkooijen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-021-01229-5","article-title":"DECIDE-AI: new reporting guidelines to bridge the development-to-implementation gap in clinical artificial intelligence","volume":"27","author":"Vasey","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-022-01772-9","article-title":"Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI","volume":"28","author":"Vasey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"2026100611031924400_znag117-B52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-023-02732-7","article-title":"The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring","volume":"30","author":"Marcus","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat Med"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/113\/10\/znag117\/71605694\/znag117.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article-pdf\/113\/10\/znag117\/71605694\/znag117.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T15:03:31Z","timestamp":1791299011000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjs\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/bjs\/znag117\/8865209"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znag117","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1323","1365-2168"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1323","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2168","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"article-number":"znag117"}}