{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T14:59:05Z","timestamp":1782140345797,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,6]],"date-time":"2021-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633478400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":30,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"National Health Service","award":["2019\/40304"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2019\/40304"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subsequent second surgery are associated with increased costs and patient discomfort. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for positive margins based on risk factors available before surgery.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Patients undergoing BCS for in situ or invasive cancer between 2015 and 2016 at site A formed a development cohort; those operated during 2017 in site A and B formed two validation cohorts. MRI was not used routinely. Preoperative radiographic and tumour characteristics and method of operation were collected from patient charts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model for positive margins including variables with discriminatory capacity identified in a univariable model. The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed in the validation cohorts, and a nomogram developed.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>There were 432 patients in the development cohort, and 190 and 157 in site A and B validation cohorts respectively. Positive margins were identified in 77 patients (17.8 per cent) in the development cohort. A non-linear transformation of mammographic tumour size and six variables (visible on mammography, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular invasive cancer, distance from nipple\u2013areola complex, calcification, and type of surgery) were included in the final prediction model, which had an area under the curve of 0.80 (95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 0.85). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed in the validation cohorts, and a nomogram developed.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The prediction model showed good ability to predict positive margins after BCS and might, after further validation, be used before surgery in centres without the routine use of preoperative MRI.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>Presented in part to the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, USA, December 2018 and the Swedish Surgical Society Annual Meeting, Helsingborg, Sweden, August 2018.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrab092","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T03:12:24Z","timestamp":1631589144000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"J","family":"Ellbrant","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Sk\u00e5ne University Hospital , Malm\u00f6, Sweden"},{"name":"Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University , Lund, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K","family":"Gulis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University , Lund, Sweden"},{"name":"Department of Surgery, Kristianstad Central Hospital , Kristianstad, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E","family":"Plasg\u00e5rd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Sk\u00e5ne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T","family":"Svensj\u00f6","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Kristianstad Central Hospital , Kristianstad, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P O","family":"Bendahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Ryd\u00e9n","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University , Lund, Sweden"},{"name":"Department of Surgery, Sk\u00e5ne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa022152","article-title":"Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer","volume":"347","author":"Fisher","year":"2002","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa020989","article-title":"Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer","volume":"347","author":"Veronesi","year":"2002","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1707","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61629-2","article-title":"Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials","volume":"378","author":"Darby","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2017.1403042","article-title":"Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival\u2014a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)","volume":"57","author":"Christiansen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2015.08.160","article-title":"Oncological results of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution: a matched-cohort analysis","volume":"42","author":"De Lorenzi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B6","first-page":"521","article-title":"Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature","volume":"9","author":"Campbell","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3247","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5313-1","article-title":"Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review","volume":"23","author":"De La Cruz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2018.04.004","article-title":"A population-based audit of surgical practice and outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservations in Scotland\u2014an analysis of 589 patients","volume":"44","author":"Romics","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019","article-title":"Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18 103 patients","volume":"220","author":"Kosasih","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e4505","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e4505","article-title":"Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics","volume":"345","author":"Jeevan","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2011.01.008","article-title":"Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals","volume":"37","author":"Talsma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5532-5","article-title":"Predictors of surgical margin following breast-conserving surgery: a large population-based cohort study","volume":"23","author":"van Deurzen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1297","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-007-9777-x","article-title":"Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer","volume":"15","author":"Waljee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2018.07.056","article-title":"Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer\u2014an analysis of 2050 patients","volume":"44","author":"Lai","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.01.010","article-title":"A validated web-based nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery as a preoperative tool for clinical decision-making","volume":"22","author":"Pleijhuis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.08.474","article-title":"Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer","volume":"41","author":"Barentsz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.43","article-title":"Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery","volume":"307","author":"McCahill","year":"2012","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-012-2124-3","article-title":"Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery","volume":"134","author":"Shin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2627","DOI":"10.2147\/OTT.S160433","article-title":"Predicting initial margin status in breast cancer patients during breast-conserving surgery","volume":"11","author":"Pan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Onco Targets Ther"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2014.11.001","article-title":"Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery","volume":"24","author":"Agostinho","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.05.009","article-title":"Positive margins prediction in breast cancer conservative surgery: assessment of a preoperative web-based nomogram","volume":"28","author":"Alves-Ribeiro","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B22","author":"STROBE","year":"2020"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B23","author":"Regionala Cancercentrum i Samverkan","year":"2020"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1925","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehu207","article-title":"Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation","volume":"35","author":"Steyerberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2507","DOI":"10.2147\/CMAR.S190852","article-title":"Positive or close margins: reoperation rate and second conservative resection or total mastectomy?","volume":"11","author":"Houvenaeghel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer Manag Res"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.14467","article-title":"Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery","volume":"88","author":"Philpott","year":"2018","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2004.07.019","article-title":"Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer","volume":"30","author":"Keskek","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2019.05.006","article-title":"MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery","volume":"57","author":"Bahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2004.06.020","article-title":"Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique","volume":"188","author":"Chagpar","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4247","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4514-3","article-title":"Positive margins after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer","volume":"22","author":"Clough","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5602-8","article-title":"Surgeon volume, patient age, and tumor-related factors influence the need for re-excision after breast-conserving surgery","volume":"23","author":"Hughes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4751","article-title":"Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery","volume":"152","author":"Langhans","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2014.926","article-title":"Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004","volume":"149","author":"Wilke","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.04.058","article-title":"Clinical benefit of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins in breast conserving surgery","volume":"42","author":"Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-020-05779-z","article-title":"External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery","volume":"183","author":"Jung","year":"2020","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)62070-5","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"375","author":"Turnbull","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.11.035","article-title":"Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET\u2014randomised controlled trial","volume":"47","author":"Peters","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.02.186","article-title":"How safe is oncoplastic breast conservation? Comparative analysis with standard breast conserving surgery","volume":"38","author":"Chakravorty","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181c82d3e","article-title":"Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article]","volume":"125","author":"Fitoussi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e020858","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020858","article-title":"Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data","volume":"8","author":"van Leeuwen","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504.e2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.043","article-title":"Surgeon re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery: a measure of low-value care","volume":"228","author":"Kaczmarski","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2015.5535","article-title":"Association of breast conservation surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York state","volume":"151","author":"Isaacs","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.07.032","article-title":"Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland","volume":"84","author":"Tang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2017.08.023","article-title":"Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines","volume":"214","author":"Heelan Gladden","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2022070905071845200_zrab092-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3185","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-3905-1","article-title":"Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database","volume":"21","author":"Landercasper","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["BJS Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/5\/5\/zrab092\/44665683\/zrab092.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/5\/5\/zrab092\/44665683\/zrab092.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,9]],"date-time":"2022-07-09T05:08:22Z","timestamp":1657343302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrab092\/6382014"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,6]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrab092","relation":{},"ISSN":["2474-9842"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2474-9842","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,6]]},"article-number":"zrab092"}}