{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T22:43:01Z","timestamp":1792017781438,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]],"date-time":"2025-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1741219200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100012141","name":"University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["BRC-1215-20011"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["BRC-1215-20011"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100012141","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100022513","name":"Department of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100022513","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100020643","name":"MRC","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100020643","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Perforated peptic ulcer remains a common contributor to morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. In common with other emergency surgery conditions, there is a trend towards minimally invasive surgery. This review aims to describe current evidence comparing open and laparoscopic management strategies for perforated peptic ulcers, by summarizing patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, describing intervention components and delivery, outcomes reported and assessing study pragmatism (applicability) using PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Systematic searches of published literature were performed using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase online databases, as well as clinical trial databases. Randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open repair of peptic ulcer were included. Data extracted included study metadata, patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes elements, technical aspects of interventions and use of co-interventions, and surgeon learning curves\/experience. Applicability was assessed using the PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 tool, to explore whether trials were predominantly pragmatic or explanatory, and study validity assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A total of 408 studies were screened for eligibility, with nine finally included (880 patients). Incision, ulcer closure details and lavage were the most frequently reported aspects of laparoscopic repair. Co-interventions such as antibiotic use and analgesia were reported in most articles, whilst nutrition and Helicobacter pylori eradication were not reported. Interventions were generally delivered by high-volume laparoscopic surgeons. Studies were considered at high Risk-of-Bias. PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 assessment found studies were neither fully pragmatic nor explanatory.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a variably defined intervention. Consideration of how intervention components and co-interventions should be optimally delivered is required to facilitate a well designed randomized trial.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae163","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]],"date-time":"2025-03-06T06:24:33Z","timestamp":1741242273000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Laparoscopic <i>versus<\/i> open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: systematic scoping review and in-depth evaluation of existing evidence"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"9","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4923-3000","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katy A","family":"Chalmers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew J","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute for Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham ,","place":["UK"]},{"name":"Department of Trauma and Emergency General Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0088-841X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sian E","family":"Cousins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5660-5314","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adam","family":"Peckham Cooper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Leeds Institute of Emergency General Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter O","family":"Coe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalie S","family":"Blencowe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol , Bristol ,","place":["UK"]},{"name":"Leeds Institute of Emergency General Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e9","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9329","article-title":"Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery","volume":"101","author":"Stewart","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B2","volume-title":"Seventh Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit","author":"NELA Project Team","year":"2021"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800770916","article-title":"Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"77","author":"Mouret","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)32636-4","article-title":"Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update)","volume":"395","author":"Krielen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000003799","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer","volume":"94","author":"Chan","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Trauma Acute Care Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6058-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: an English national population-based cohort study","volume":"32","author":"Leusink","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-018-4047-8","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease has better outcomes than open repair","volume":"23","author":"Quah","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000004332","article-title":"Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease: a propensity-matched study of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit","volume":"275","author":"Coe","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105906","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.105906","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"88","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.10254","article-title":"Standardizing and monitoring the delivery of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials","volume":"103","author":"Blencowe","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h2147","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h2147","article-title":"The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose","volume":"350","author":"Loudon","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.06.023","article-title":"PRECIS-2 for retrospective assessment of RCTs in systematic reviews","volume":"126","author":"Zwarenstein","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1368","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-009-0054-y","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA trial","volume":"33","author":"Bertleff","year":"2009","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B15","first-page":"451","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcers","volume":"159","author":"Ge","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surgery (United States)"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(98)00006-3","article-title":"A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair","volume":"175","author":"Lau","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199608000-00004","article-title":"A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique","volume":"224","author":"Lau","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B18","first-page":"11991","article-title":"Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for upper gastrointestinal perforation in elderly patients","volume":"10","author":"Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B19","first-page":"315","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a district general hospital","volume":"8","author":"Motewar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prz Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-013-0853-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic peptic ulcer perforation closure: the preferred choice","volume":"77","author":"Shah","year":"2015","journal-title":"Indian J Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200203000-00001","article-title":"Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"235","author":"Siu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2055","DOI":"10.11569\/wcjd.v22.i14.2055","article-title":"Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: analysis of 53 cases","volume":"22","author":"Yang","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Chin J Digestol"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2023.08.066","article-title":"Exploring the reporting standards of randomised controlled trials involving endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review","volume":"67","author":"Zywicka","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-020-02359-7","article-title":"A systematic review of the quality of reporting of interventions in the surgical treatment of Crohn\u2019s anal fistula: an assessment using the TIDiER and Blencowe frameworks","volume":"25","author":"Tyrell","year":"2021","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003748","article-title":"A systematic review of minimally invasive trans-thoracic liver resection to examine intervention description, governance, and outcome reporting of an innovative technique","volume":"273","author":"Pathak","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.16361","article-title":"Endoscopic sinusectomy: \u2018a rose by any other name\u2019. A systematic review of different endoscopic procedures to treat pilonidal disease","volume":"25","author":"Milone","year":"2023","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.01.048","article-title":"Randomized trials in cardiac surgery: JACC review topic of the week","volume":"75","author":"Gaudino","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjaa166","article-title":"Evaluation of the completeness of interventions reported in published randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review","volume":"41","author":"Evans","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.7326\/M17-0046","article-title":"CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts","volume":"167","author":"Boutron","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g1687","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g1687","article-title":"Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide","volume":"348","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjmed-2022-000284","article-title":"Core outcome sets in medical research","volume":"1","author":"Kirkham","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Med"},{"key":"2025041713223621000_zrae163-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac096","article-title":"Defining core patient descriptors for perforated peptic ulcer research: international Delphi","volume":"109","author":"PPU CDS collaborators","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Surg"}],"container-title":["BJS Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/9\/2\/zrae163\/62298123\/zrae163.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/9\/2\/zrae163\/62298123\/zrae163.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T17:22:46Z","timestamp":1744910566000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae163\/8056071"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae163","relation":{},"ISSN":["2474-9842"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2474-9842","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]},"article-number":"zrae163"}}