{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T03:11:51Z","timestamp":1787800311253,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783036800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The single-stapling technique (SST) is an alternative to the conventional double-stapling technique (DST), particularly in low rectal surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared anastomotic leak (AL) between SST and DST.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic review of the PubMed\/MEDLINE, Google Scholar\u00ae, and Scopus databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from inception through December 2025. The primary outcome of interest was AL. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare AL, blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay between SST and DST. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted according to surgical approach. Risk of bias was assessed, and the certainty of the evidence for AL was evaluated using the GRADE framework.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 448 articles screened, 14 were included (2 randomized, 12 observational studies), comprising 1326 patients in the SST group and 1720 in the DST group. SST was associated with a significantly lower risk of AL than DST (RR 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.90; P = 0.012), with moderate heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with zero events yielded consistent results. Subgroup analyses showed no difference in AL for open intracorporeal SST compared with DST, a trend toward benefit with minimally invasive intracorporeal SST compared with DST, and a pronounced reduction in AL with transanal SST compared with DST.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although the causes of AL are multifactorial, with respect to the stapling technique, SST was associated with a lower risk of AL than DST, and this effect was primarily driven by transanal SST. However, the certainty of evidence is low, and ongoing prospective studies will better define the role of SST.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrag078","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T11:52:24Z","timestamp":1778673144000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Single-stapling\n                    <i>versus<\/i>\n                    double-stapling technique for rectal anastomosis\u2014meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7691-6355","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dimitrios","family":"Kehagias","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charalampos","family":"Lampropoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Intensive Care Unit, St Andrew\u2019s General Hospital of Patras , Patras ,","place":["Greece"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ioannis","family":"Kehagias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Patras , Patras ,","place":["Greece"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Jayne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]},{"name":"Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jim","family":"Tiernan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds ,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B1","first-page":"270","article-title":"The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review","volume":"58","author":"Baran","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01647658","article-title":"Double versus single stapling technique in rectal anastomosis","volume":"7","author":"Bozzetti","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B3","first-page":"710","article-title":"An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler","volume":"88","author":"Knight","year":"1980","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2022.101708","article-title":"Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery","volume":"40","author":"Chiarello","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2059","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-4187-3","article-title":"Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis","volume":"22","author":"Kulu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003478","article-title":"Impact of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery on quality of life: a systematic review","volume":"68","author":"Gielen","year":"2025","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2022.02.019","article-title":"Comprehensive literature review of the outcome, modifications, and alternatives to double-stapled low pelvic colorectal anastomosis","volume":"172","author":"Emile","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1756510","article-title":"The colorectal anastomosis: a timeless challenge","volume":"36","author":"Gaidarski","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Colon Rectal Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2988","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3564-0","article-title":"Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis","volume":"28","author":"Kawada","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14376","article-title":"An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)","volume":"20","author":"2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Collaborating Group","year":"2018","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.11459","article-title":"Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway","volume":"107","author":"Wasmuth","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.15143","article-title":"The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision","volume":"22","author":"Fearnhead","year":"2020","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14631","article-title":"Integration of transanal techniques for precise rectal transection and single-stapled anastomosis: a proof of concept study","volume":"21","author":"Spinelli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2021.08.002","article-title":"Transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS): a comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer","volume":"47","author":"Spinelli","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000003790","article-title":"International consensus on reporting anastomotic leaks after colorectal cancer surgery: the CoReAL reporting framework","volume":"68","author":"Heuvelings","year":"2025","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","article-title":"Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range","volume":"14","author":"Wan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","article-title":"Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range","volume":"27","author":"Luo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02049936","article-title":"Single vs. double stapling technique in colorectal surgery. A prospective randomized trial","volume":"34","author":"Moritz","year":"1991","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00757.x","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality after single- and double-stapled colorectal anastomoses in patients with carcinoma of the rectum","volume":"66","author":"Moore","year":"1996","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7819-5-35","article-title":"Outcomes of resection for rectal cancer in India: the impact of the double stapling technique","volume":"5","author":"Shrikhande","year":"2007","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-012-1582-8","article-title":"Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study","volume":"28","author":"Kim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-013-1723-8","article-title":"A new colorectal\/coloanal anastomotic technique in sphincter-preserving operation for lower rectal carcinoma using transanal pull-through combined with single stapling technique","volume":"28","author":"Bie","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-013-0646-x","article-title":"Single versus double stapling anastomotic technique in rectal cancer surgery","volume":"44","author":"Radovanovic","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000739","article-title":"Natural orifice specimen extraction with single stapling colorectal anastomosis for laparoscopic anterior resection: feasibility, outcomes, and technical considerations","volume":"60","author":"Saurabh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-022-04197-5","article-title":"The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery","volume":"37","author":"Brunner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2023.02.018","article-title":"Single-stapled anastomosis is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined low rectal cancer","volume":"173","author":"Foppa","year":"2023","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2346","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.16789","article-title":"IDEAL stage 2a\/b prospective cohort study of transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer","volume":"25","author":"Harji","year":"2023","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.19387","article-title":"Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection","volume":"95","author":"Raju","year":"2025","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B33","first-page":"1","article-title":"Robotic intracorporeal single-stapled anastomosis (RISS) is associated with lower anastomotic leakage rates than the double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer","volume":"33","author":"Stevanato Filho","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5318","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5611-0","article-title":"Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate","volume":"31","author":"Braunschmid","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02460-9","article-title":"Comparing the perioperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes between robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies with a subgroup analysis for overweight patients","volume":"19","author":"Kossenas","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1981","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.16745","article-title":"What is the impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes in rectal cancer surgery?","volume":"25","author":"Boyle","year":"2023","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.109759","article-title":"Long-term functional outcomes after transanal transection and single-stapled (TTSS) anastomosis for rectal cancer measured by electronic patients reported outcome measures (ePROMs)","volume":"51","author":"Foppa","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101691","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2021.101691","article-title":"Low anterior resection syndrome: predisposing factors and treatment","volume":"43","author":"Garfinkle","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2026081701221044000_zrag078-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70186","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.70186","article-title":"Association between anastomotic leak after rectal resection and bowel dysfunction, a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression","volume":"27","author":"Emile","year":"2025","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"}],"container-title":["BJS Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/10\/4\/zrag078\/68694246\/zrag078.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article-pdf\/10\/4\/zrag078\/68694246\/zrag078.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T05:22:22Z","timestamp":1786944142000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjsopen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrag078\/8724525"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrag078","relation":{},"ISSN":["2474-9842"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2474-9842","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]]},"article-number":"zrag078"}}