{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T21:15:29Z","timestamp":1790284529830,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjx024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,16]],"date-time":"2017-03-16T00:10:18Z","timestamp":1489623018000},"page":"453-461","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":50,"title":["Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Mohammed","family":"Saleh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0640-1297","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammad Y","family":"Hajeer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dieter","family":"Muessig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0001","volume-title":"Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques","year":"2005"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2014.01.019","article-title":"Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review","volume":"145","year":"2014","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0003","first-page":"95","article-title":"Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers","volume":"32","year":"1998","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.2319\/072610-437.1","article-title":"A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers","volume":"81","year":"2011","journal-title":"Angle Orthodontist"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.4041\/kjod.2012.42.5.255","article-title":"Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers","volume":"42","year":"2012","journal-title":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0006","first-page":"640","article-title":"Rationale for retention following orthodontic treatment","volume":"64","year":"1998","journal-title":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.06.019","article-title":"The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial","volume":"132","year":"2007","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ebd.6400650","article-title":"Vacuum-formed retainers more effective than Hawley retainers","volume":"10","year":"2009","journal-title":"Evidence Based Dentistry"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.2319\/030814-163.1","article-title":"Patient compliance with Hawley retainers fitted with the SMART(R) sensor: a prospective clinical pilot study","volume":"85","year":"2015","journal-title":"Angle Orthodontist"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/0889-5406(90)70106-M","article-title":"Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear","volume":"97","year":"1990","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1179\/146531204225022434","article-title":"The development of a patient-centered measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment","volume":"31","year":"2004","journal-title":"Journal of Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/ocr.1999.2.2.53","article-title":"Understanding orthodontic treatment satisfaction from the patients\u2019 perspective: a qualitative approach","volume":"2","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clinical and Orthodontic Research"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/S1073-8746(99)80028-0","article-title":"Developing outcome measures in orthodontics that reflect patient and provider values","volume":"5","year":"1999","journal-title":"Seminars in Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjm039","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers","volume":"29","year":"2007","journal-title":"European Journal of Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.02.035","article-title":"Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase","volume":"140","year":"2011","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0016","first-page":"CD002283","article-title":"Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces","volume":"1","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0017","first-page":"394","article-title":"Use of stamped chart notations to enhance patient compliance","volume":"26","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/0889-5406(89)90228-X","article-title":"Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment","volume":"96","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0019","volume-title":"An Introduction to Medical Statistics","year":"2000"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1972.10481232","article-title":"An approximate analysis of variance test for normality","volume":"67","year":"1972","journal-title":"Journal of the American Statistical Association"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1093\/ortho\/30.3.245","article-title":"How to\u2026write and analyse a questionnaire","volume":"30","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-0005(97)80013-4","article-title":"Evidence-based medicine","volume":"21","year":"1997","journal-title":"Seminar Perinatology"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2003.08.013","article-title":"Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?","volume":"25","year":"2004","journal-title":"Controlled Clinical Trials"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034511415274","article-title":"Survival time comparison between Hawley and clear overlay retainers: a randomized trial","volume":"90","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Dental Research"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjp145","article-title":"Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention\u2014a randomized controlled trial","volume":"32","year":"2010","journal-title":"European Journal of Orthodontics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(98)70261-6","article-title":"Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention?","volume":"113","year":"1998","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0027","volume-title":"Contemporary Orthodontics","year":"2013"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20170728014448_CIT0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"776","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(69)90050-5","article-title":"Principles of retention and avoidance of posttreatment relapse","volume":"55","year":"1969","journal-title":"American Journal of Orthodontics"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Orthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ejo\/article-pdf\/39\/4\/453\/19344069\/cjx024.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,19]],"date-time":"2019-09-19T16:17:42Z","timestamp":1568909862000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ejo\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjx024"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,19]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,19]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjx024","relation":{},"ISSN":["0141-5387","1460-2210"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0141-5387","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2210","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,19]]}}}