{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T21:23:47Z","timestamp":1780694627352,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Family Practice"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,2,1]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmh115","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,2,3]],"date-time":"2004-02-03T15:38:11Z","timestamp":1075822691000},"page":"66-74","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Is chronic pain a distinct diagnosis in primary care?: Evidence arising from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception study"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"B. H","family":"Smith","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","container-title":["Family Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/fampra\/article-pdf\/21\/1\/66\/1623514\/cmh115.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,23]],"date-time":"2017-08-23T01:35:26Z","timestamp":1503452126000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/fampra\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1093\/fampra\/cmh115"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,2,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,2,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/fampra\/cmh115","relation":{},"ISSN":["1460-2229"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1460-2229","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,2,1]]}}}