{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T02:35:55Z","timestamp":1767839755650,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]],"date-time":"2021-08-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629417600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Is pregnancy success rate after a concise infertility work-up the same as pregnancy success rate after the traditional extensive infertility work-up?<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The ongoing pregnancy rate within a follow-up of 1 year after a concise infertility work-up is significantly lower than the pregnancy success rate after the traditional and extensive infertility work-up.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Based on cost-effectiveness studies, which have mainly focused on diagnosis, infertility work-up has become less comprehensive. Many centres have even adopted a one-stop approach to their infertility work-up.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We performed a historically controlled cohort study. In 2012 and 2013 all new infertile couples (n = 795) underwent an extensive infertility work-up (group A). In 2014 and 2015, all new infertile couples (n = 752) underwent a concise infertility work-up (group B). The follow-up period was 1 year for both groups. Complete follow-up was available for 99.0% of couples in group A and 97.5% in group B.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The extensive infertility work-up consisted of history taking, a gynaecological ultrasound scan, semen analysis, ultrasonographic cycle monitoring, a timed postcoital test, a timed progesterone and chlamydia antibody titre. A hysterosalpingography (HSG) was advised routinely. The concise infertility work-up was mainly based on history taking, a gynaecological ultrasound scan and semen analysis. A HSG was only performed if tubal pathology was suspected or before the start of IUI. Laparoscopy and hormonal tests were only performed if indicated. Couples were treated according to the diagnosis with either expectant management (if the Hunault prognostic score was &amp;gt;30%), ovulation induction (in case of ovulation disorders), IUI in natural cycles (in case of cervical factor), IUI in stimulated cycles (if the Hunault prognostic score was &amp;lt;30%) or IVF\/ICSI (in case of tubal factor, advanced female age, severe male factor and if other treatments remained unsuccessful). The primary outcomes were time to pregnancy and the ongoing pregnancy rates in both groups. The secondary outcomes were the number of investigations, the distribution of diagnoses made, the first treatment (started) after infertility work-up and the mode of conception.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The descriptive data, such as age, duration of infertility, type of infertility and lifestyle habits, in both groups were comparable. In group A, more than twice the number of infertility investigations were performed, compared to group B. An HSG was made less frequently in group B (33% versus 42%) and at a later stage. A Kaplan\u2013Meier curve shows a shorter time to pregnancy in group A. Also, a significantly higher overall ongoing pregnancy rate within a follow-up of 1 year was found in group A (58.7% versus 46.8%, respectively, P &amp;lt; 0.001). In group A, more couples conceived during the infertility work-up (14.7% versus 6.5%, respectively, P &amp;lt; 0.05). The diagnosis cervical infertility could only be made in group A (9.3%). The diagnosis unexplained infertility differed between groups, at 23.5% in group A and 32.2% in group B (P &amp;lt; 0.001).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This was a historically controlled cohort study; introduction of bias cannot be ruled out. The follow-up rate was similar in the two groups and therefore could not explain the differences in pregnancy rate.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Re-introduction of an extensive infertility work-up should be considered as it may lead to higher ongoing pregnancy rates within a year. The therapeutic effects of HSG and timing of intercourse may improve the fertility chance. This finding should be verified in a randomized controlled trial.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>No funding was obtained for this study. No conflicts of interest were declared.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,17]],"date-time":"2021-08-17T20:21:07Z","timestamp":1629231667000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A concise infertility work-up results in fewer pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2021","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1269-9504","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J A M","family":"Hamilton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J W","family":"van der Steeg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C J C M","family":"Hamilton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J P","family":"de Bruin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)81391-X","article-title":"Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis","volume":"67","author":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.032","article-title":"Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion","volume":"98","author":"American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-200208000-00006","article-title":"One-stop endoscopy based infertility clinic","volume":"14","author":"Brosens","year":"2002","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del521","article-title":"The predictive value of medical history taking and Chlamydia IgG ELISA antibody testing (CAT) in the selection of subfertile women for diagnostic laparoscopy: a clinical prediction model approach","volume":"22","author":"Coppus","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2685","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem251","article-title":"Identifying subfertile women for timely tubal patency testing: a clinical decision model based on medical history","volume":"22","author":"Coppus","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12124","article-title":"Establishment of lipiodol as a fertility treatment\u2014prospective study of the complete innovative treatment data set","volume":"54","author":"Court","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2043","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1612337","article-title":"Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women","volume":"376","author":"Dreyer","year":"2017","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56451-6","article-title":"The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples","volume":"61","author":"Eimers","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der367","article-title":"First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing","volume":"27","author":"Emanuel","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7189.1007a","article-title":"Letter: Postcoital testing\u2014criterion for positive test was not given","volume":"318","author":"Hull","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1953","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.9.1953","article-title":"The prognostic power of the post-coital test for natural conception depends on duration of infertility","volume":"15","author":"Glazener CMA, Ford, WCL, Hull MGR","year":"2000","journal-title":"Human Reproduction Update"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1959","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg366","article-title":"Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility","volume":"18","author":"Gnoth","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12442","article-title":"Long-term ongoing pregnancy rate and mode of conception after a positive and negative post-coital test","volume":"93","author":"Hessel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2019","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh365","article-title":"Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models","volume":"19","author":"Hunault","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1636","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh821","article-title":"Prospective validation of two models predicting pregnancy leading to live birth among untreated subfertile couples","volume":"20","author":"Hunault","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B16","volume-title":"IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0","author":"IBM Corp","year":"2012"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02070.x","article-title":"The value of medical history taking as risk indicator for tuboperitoneal pathology: a systematic review","volume":"116","author":"Luttjeboer","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B19","article-title":"Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive","volume":"17","author":"Manders","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01748-9","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples","volume":"75","author":"Mol","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B22","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline 156, Fertility","year":"2013"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B23","author":"Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","year":"2004"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7157.502","article-title":"Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial","volume":"317","author":"Oei","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)44056-2","article-title":"Chlamydial serology in infertile women by immunofluorescence","volume":"31","author":"Punnonen","year":"1979","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.042","article-title":"Long term outcome in subfertile couples with isolated cervical factor","volume":"170","author":"Scholten","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)69042-9","article-title":"Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"368","author":"Steures","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh230","article-title":"Should the post-coital test (PCT) be part of the routine fertility work-up?","volume":"19","author":"van der Steeg","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq263","article-title":"The capacity of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy to predict natural conception","volume":"26","author":"Verhoeve","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1517","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199512073332301","article-title":"Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby","volume":"333","author":"Wilcox","year":"1995","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021101013104949100_hoab033-B32","article-title":"WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2010","journal-title":"World Health Organization"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab033\/39829934\/hoab033.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2021\/4\/hoab033\/40544166\/hoab033.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2021\/4\/hoab033\/40544166\/hoab033.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,11]],"date-time":"2021-10-11T02:26:43Z","timestamp":1633919203000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab033\/6355590"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab033","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2399-3529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]]},"article-number":"hoab033"}}