{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T12:02:25Z","timestamp":1753876945969,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,4]],"date-time":"2022-10-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664841600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":276,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>What is the relationship between the position that anonymous gamete donation is wrong (i.e. the anti-anonymity position) and the position that all gamete donation is wrong (i.e. the anti-donation position)? Some argue that people who accept the anti-anonymity position should also accept the anti-donation position on the grounds that the two positions share the same main arguments. But that\u2019s not true. One argument in favor of anti-anonymity does not generate genuine dialectical pressure to accept the anti-donation position. The other anti-anonymity arguments do generate dialectical pressure, but not in a way that pushes toward the anti-donation position. Instead, they push toward what we might call the \u2018pro-known-donation\u2019 position. So, either there is no dialectical pressure or, where there is, it doesn\u2019t flow toward the anti-donation position.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac041","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,4]],"date-time":"2022-10-04T12:59:26Z","timestamp":1664888366000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Gamete donation: anti-anonymity does not equate to anti-donation"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2022","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7208-7449","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"Groll","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Philosophy, Carleton College , Northfield, MN, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780190063054.001.0001","volume-title":"Conceiving People: Genetic Knowledge and the Ethics of Sperm and Egg Donation","author":"Groll","year":"2021"},{"key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoac028","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac028","article-title":"The forgotten group of donor-conceived persons","volume":"2022","author":"Pennings","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B3","first-page":"117","article-title":"Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm","volume":"5","author":"Shiffrin","year":"1999","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.101388","article-title":"Donor conception and children\u2019s rights: \u201cFirst, do no harm\u201d","volume":"183","author":"Somerville","year":"2011","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"author":"Wearedonorconceived","key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B151"},{"volume-title":"The Risk of a Lifetime: how, When, and Why Procreation May Be Permissible","year":"2016","author":"Weinberg","key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B5"},{"key":"2022101319470697200_hoac041-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199656066.003.0004","volume-title":"Family-Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges","author":"Witt","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoac041\/46339966\/hoac041.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2022\/4\/hoac041\/46500849\/hoac041.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2022\/4\/hoac041\/46500849\/hoac041.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]],"date-time":"2022-10-13T19:47:28Z","timestamp":1665690448000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoac041\/6747962"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,10]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoac041","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2399-3529"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]]},"article-number":"hoac041"}}