{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T18:03:41Z","timestamp":1790273021132,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,23]],"date-time":"2023-02-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677110400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":53,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"NHS Grampian Endowment Research"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title><jats:p>Are perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst versus fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer (ET) different in singletons, twins, and between singleton siblings?<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title><jats:p>Singleton babies conceived following fresh blastocyst, versus cleavage stage, ET are less likely to be small for gestational age (SGA) or to have a congenital anomaly (a result confirmed by comparing singleton siblings), while singletons born following fresh blastocyst ET were at a higher risk of being large for gestational age (LGA) than their sibling born following fresh cleavage stage ET.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title><jats:p>Blastocyst stage transfer is now the preferred strategy in most IVF units. Previous studies have suggested that babies conceived through blastocyst transfer are at increased risk of preterm birth and LGA.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title><jats:p>A national population-based retrospective cohort study was performed using linked Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) data on 130\u200a516 IVF and ICSI livebirths occurring from 103\u200a062 women between 2000 and 2017.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>We included women who had at least one singleton livebirth resulting from IVF\/ICSI fresh embryo treatment, using their own eggs and partner\u2019s sperm. A linked HFEA dataset was analysed using a multilevel framework, which accommodated repeated IVF cycles resulting in livebirths in the same woman. A population-averaged robust Poisson model was used for binary outcomes and a multinomial logistic regression model was used for categorical outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) (95% CI) were calculated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were 130\u200a516 livebirths in 103\u200a062 women, including 86\u200a630 singletons, 43\u200a886 twin births, and 5384 pairs of singleton siblings. In comparison with fresh cleavage stage ET, fresh blastocyst stage transfer in singletons was associated with a lower risk of low birthweight (aRR\u2009=\u20090.92; 95% CI 0.86, 0.99), lower risk of being SGA (0.83; 0.78, 0.89), and lower risk of congenital anomaly (0.79; 0.71, 0.89). This analysis did not show an increase in risk associated with preterm birth (1.00; 0.94, 1.06), high birthweight (0.99; 0.93, 1.06), LGA (0.99; 0.93, 1.05), and the chance of healthy singleton baby (1.00; 1.00, 1.02). Twins resulting from fresh blastocyst stage ET were at slightly higher risk of preterm birth (1.05; 1.02, 1.10) compared with twins conceived following fresh cleavage stage ET. There was insufficient evidence for an association with the other perinatal outcomes. Singleton siblings born following fresh blastocyst stage ET were at a higher risk of being LGA (1.57; 1.01, 2.46) and at lower risk of having a congenital anomaly (0.52; 0.28, 0.97) compared to their singleton siblings born following cleavage stage ET. There was some evidence of excess risk of preterm birth (1.42; 0.97, 2.23) associated with blastocyst stage transfer. However, we could not confirm an association between blastocyst stage ET and low birthweight (1.35; 0.81, 2.27), high birthweight (1.19; 0.80, 1.77), and the chance of being a healthy baby (0.97; 0.86, 1.09).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title><jats:p>This was an observational study where we were unable to adjust for some key confounders, such as maternal smoking status and BMI, which may change from one pregnancy to another and are not recorded in the HFEA dataset.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the largest study of its kind, our analysis of singleton siblings, corrected for unmeasured, non-time varying maternal factors, confirms the previously reported association between blastocyst transfer and LGA babies, and shows a reduced risk of congenital anomaly following blastocyst transfer. Our sibling analysis did not confirm a decreased risk of low birthweight following blastocyst transfer. Overall, absolute risks are low and there is insufficient evidence to challenge the practice of extended culture of embryos.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title><jats:p>This project is financed by an NHS Grampian Endowment Research Grant, project number 17\/052. One of the authors, S.B., was the Editor in Chief of HROpen until 31 December 2022 and would have been in that role when the paper was first submitted. As an invited speaker, S.B. has received travel expenses, accommodation and honoraria from Merck, Organon, and Ferring. A.M. has received travel expenses, accommodation, and honoraria from Merck Serono, Cook Medical, Pharmasure, Gedeon Richter, and Ferring. D.J.M. is currently a HROpen Associate Editor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title><jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,23]],"date-time":"2023-02-23T17:26:22Z","timestamp":1677173182000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["A comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfer in singletons and twins and between singleton siblings"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2023","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0853-9724","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Edwin-Amalraj","family":"Raja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Polwarth Building, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4588-356X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Siladitya","family":"Bhattacharya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3652-2447","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Abha","family":"Maheshwari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian , Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8905-2429","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David J","family":"McLernon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Polwarth Building, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18942","article-title":"Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Alviggi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.03.039","article-title":"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2013","volume":"116","author":"Banker","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1080\/03014460902980295","article-title":"Growth and chronic disease: findings in the Helsinki Birth Cohort","volume":"36","author":"Barker","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Hum Biol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-8-5","article-title":"Centile charts for birthweight for gestational age for Scottish singleton births","volume":"8","author":"Bonellie","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23606","article-title":"Twin chorionicity-specific population birth-weight charts adjusted for estimated fetal weight","volume":"58","author":"Briffa","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1203\/PDR.0b013e31819e7422","article-title":"Association of preterm birth with brain malformations","volume":"65","author":"Brown","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pediatr Res"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyi153","article-title":"Regression models for twin studies: a critical review","volume":"34","author":"Carlin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.2307\/2297110","article-title":"Analysis of covariance with qualitative data","volume":"47","author":"Chamberlain","year":"1980","journal-title":"Rev Econ Stud"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1130","article-title":"Risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer: a large population study using contemporary registry data from Australia and New Zealand","volume":"104","author":"Chambers","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01139337","article-title":"Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts","volume":"2","author":"Cohen","year":"1985","journal-title":"J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1947","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.9.1947","article-title":"Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial","volume":"15","author":"Coskun","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu001","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Dar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des448","article-title":"Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies after blastocyst versus Day 3 embryo transfer: Canadian ART Register (CARTR) analysis","volume":"28","author":"Dar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu286","article-title":"The type of culture medium and the duration of in vitro culture do not influence birthweight of ART singletons","volume":"30","author":"De Vos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcn\/59.5.955","article-title":"Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity","volume":"59","author":"Dietz","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Clin Nutr"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep456","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns","volume":"25","author":"Dumoulin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2145","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg394","article-title":"Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study","volume":"18","author":"Emiliani","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2281","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq187","article-title":"A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007","volume":"25","author":"Farquhar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.040","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. Presented orally at the 36th Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Feb. 1-6, 2016","volume":"214","author":"Ginstr\u00f6m Ernstad","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology","author":"Glujoversusky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","volume-title":"Generalized Estimating Equations: Overview","author":"Hardin","year":"2003"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1075","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study","volume":"95","author":"Henningsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","author":"HFEA","year":"1990"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","author":"HFEA","year":"2016"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","author":"HFEA","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","author":"HFEA","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.03.033","article-title":"Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study","volume":"110","author":"Holden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025","article-title":"Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan","volume":"101","author":"Ishihara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1680","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.12.027","article-title":"Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome?","volume":"94","author":"K\u00e4ll\u00e9n","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825b88fc","article-title":"Extended embryo culture and an increased risk of preterm delivery","volume":"120","author":"Kalra","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.12.127","article-title":"Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention","volume":"103","author":"Kissin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1168-7","article-title":"Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study","volume":"35","author":"Litzky","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0850-x","article-title":"Increased risk of large-for-gestational age birthweight in singleton siblings conceived with in vitro fertilization in frozen versus fresh cycles","volume":"34","author":"Luke","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.08.044","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"828","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des410","article-title":"Does long in vitro culture promote large for gestational age babies?","volume":"28","author":"M\u00e4kinen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1716","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez133","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in singleton live births after fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 67 147 IVF\/ICSI cycles","volume":"34","author":"Marconi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2561","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew244","article-title":"Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Martins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-3242-6","volume-title":"Generalized Linear Models","author":"McCullagh","year":"1989"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1966","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des145","article-title":"Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos","volume":"27","author":"Nelissen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1198\/jasa.2006.s118","volume-title":"Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS","author":"Neuhaus","year":"2006"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.3109\/09513590.2015.1006615","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcome from single cleavage transfer and single blastocyst transfer: a matched case-control study","volume":"31","author":"Oron","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.018","article-title":"Extended embryo culture is not associated with increased adverse obstetric or perinatal outcome","volume":"211","author":"Oron","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ogx.0000228704.71058.7b","article-title":"In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos","volume":"61","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3198","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei217","article-title":"Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study","volume":"20","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"Suppl 8","key":"2023030819251339200_","first-page":"S1","article-title":"Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review","volume":"23","author":"Parsons","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X1401400409","article-title":"Femlogit\u2014implementation of the multinomial logit model with fixed effects","volume":"14","author":"Pforr","year":"2014","journal-title":"Stat J"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)61041-7","article-title":"Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study","volume":"372","author":"Romundstad","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","author":"SART","year":"2021"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.11.015","article-title":"Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings","volume":"105","author":"Seggers","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.031","article-title":"Comparison of perinatal outcomes following blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 10 years\u2019 data from a single centre","volume":"38","author":"Shi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa032","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal risks in 4601 singletons and 884 twins conceived after fresh blastocyst transfers: a Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group","volume":"35","author":"Spangmose","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu053","article-title":"Association between response to ovarian stimulation and miscarriage following IVF: an analysis of 124 351 IVF pregnancies","volume":"29","author":"Sunkara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1536","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq067","article-title":"Better perinatal outcomes following transfer of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos: a population-based study","volume":"25","author":"Wang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-017-0255-4","article-title":"Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2014.55.3.815","article-title":"Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis","volume":"55","author":"Wang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01412.x","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies","volume":"91","author":"Weissmann-Brenner","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwr230","article-title":"On the pitfalls of adjusting for gestational age at birth","volume":"174","author":"Wilcox","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1530\/ror.0.0030155","article-title":"Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep","volume":"3","author":"Young","year":"1998","journal-title":"Rev Reprod"},{"key":"2023030819251339200_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det460","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture period on birthweight of singleton newborns","volume":"29","author":"Zhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoad003\/49315697\/hoad003.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2023\/2\/hoad003\/49457301\/hoad003.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2023\/2\/hoad003\/49457301\/hoad003.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,26]],"date-time":"2023-03-26T09:56:05Z","timestamp":1679824565000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoad003\/7055299"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,7]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoad003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2399-3529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]]},"article-number":"hoad003"}}