{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T07:38:40Z","timestamp":1787729920674,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768262400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":12,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Are there differences between perinatal outcomes following frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF, and do endometrium preparation methods contribute to the differences?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Compared with fresh embryo transfers, frozen transfers, regardless of hormone replacement treatment or natural treatment cycles, were associated with lower chances of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age, but higher chances of caesarean section, high birth weight, and large for gestational age.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Frozen embryo transfer has been increasing over the past two decades, but its associated perinatal risks and underlying reasons remain controversial. Most existing observational studies have not accounted for multiple cycles from the same couple or known patients\u2019 characteristics or treatment protocols, such as endometrial preparation methods, in the analysis. Existing birthweight centile charts are likely to underestimate intra-uterine growth restriction due to the inclusion of deliveries following obstetric interventions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This multicentre retrospective cohort study used routinely collected clinical data of 8081 women undergoing IVF who gave birth to 9243 babies (6125 from the frozen and 3118 from fresh transfer cycles) in 12 IVF clinics across two states in Australia between 2015 and 2021, with follow-up data up to 2023.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Individuals undergoing autologous-oocyte IVF cycles who had singleton live births were included. An individual could have multiple treatment cycles included. Perinatal outcomes included preterm birth, low\/high birth weight, small-\/large-for-gestational-age, and caesarean section. The birthweight percentiles were calculated based on the New Australian birthweight centiles, where interventions-initiated births were excluded. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance was used to analyse all outcomes. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to account for the cluster effects of multiple embryo transfer cycles of the same individual. Adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported for each outcome. The adjusted model accounted for potential confounding factors, including female age, parity, semen source, ovulatory disorders, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, blastocyst transfer, number of embryos transferred, and site. In subgroup analysis, frozen transfers with different endometrial preparation methods (hormone replacement and natural cycles) were compared to the fresh transfers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Compared with births in the fresh group, births in the frozen transfer group were less likely to be preterm (8.9% vs 13.7%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.66 0.58\u20130.76), low birth weight (5.3% vs 8.5%, aRR 0.66, 0.55\u20130.78), and small for gestational age (4.2% vs 7.9%, aRR 0.62, 0.51\u20130.75), but more likely to be caesarean section (57.5% vs 50.4%, aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09\u20131.19), high birth weight (10.1% vs 7.0%, aRR 1.43, 1.21\u20131.68), and large-for-gestational-age (20.0% vs 13.6%, aRR 1.37, 1.23\u20131.53). The differences remained consistent when comparing hormone replacement or natural cycle frozen transfers to fresh transfers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The retrospective nature introduces inherent challenges of residual confounding.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results indicate that the differences in birth weight related to perinatal outcomes between frozen versus fresh embryo transfer cycles are unlikely due to the differences in the use of endometrial preparation protocols in frozen cycles, but may be attributed to other factors including impaired endometrial characteristics in fresh cycles or the process of vitrification and warming embryos in frozen cycles.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>H.Z. was supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. N.A. was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. R.W. was supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). D.Z. and M.G. reported that they are employees of the company from which the data were analysed for this study. No conflicts of interest from other authors were reported.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoag002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T12:54:18Z","timestamp":1767963258000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes\u2014do endometrial preparation methods matter?"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2026","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7666-3914","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Haowen","family":"Zou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deirdre","family":"Zander-Fox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash IVF Group , Cremorne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Biomedical Discovery Institute, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Department of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide , Adelaide,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Au","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6276-7010","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yanhe","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility North , Perth, Western Australia,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia , Perth, Western Australia,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Beverley","family":"Vollenhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Monash IVF Group , Cremorne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Women\u2019s and Newborn Program, Monash Health , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark P","family":"Green","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash IVF Group , Cremorne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6622-8134","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rui","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)55259-5","article-title":"The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation","volume":"58","author":"Bergh","year":"1992","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2319","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez233","article-title":"Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART?","volume":"34","author":"Blockeel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome","volume":"375","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoaf020","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaf020","article-title":"Perinatal risks associated with infertility and medically assisted reproduction: a population-based cohort study","volume":"2025","author":"Choi","year":"2025","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.08.018","article-title":"Potential role of the corpus luteum in maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy and preeclampsia risk","volume":"226","author":"Conrad","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03041-9","article-title":"Pathologic maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with programmed embryo transfer","volume":"41","author":"Conrad","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1142\/S2661318224500026","article-title":"Variation in the incidence and type of full versus mosaic segmental aneuploidies identified in blastocysts undergoing PGT-A","volume":"06","author":"Cuman","year":"2024","journal-title":"FandR"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1820","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev134","article-title":"Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT","volume":"30","author":"Debrock","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.11331","article-title":"Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998\u20132007","volume":"197","author":"Dobbins","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu027","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence","volume":"20","author":"Evans","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-021-00570-x","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: a sibling cohort","volume":"29","author":"Ganer Herman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","article-title":"Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer","volume":"73","author":"Gardner","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.010","article-title":"Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer","volume":"112","author":"Hwang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.5694\/mja2.50676","article-title":"New Australian birthweight centiles","volume":"213","author":"Joseph","year":"2020","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.12.005","article-title":"Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer","volume":"161","author":"Kato","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-0940-4","article-title":"Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze","volume":"34","author":"Kaye","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2794","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu246","article-title":"Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study","volume":"29","author":"Li","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009","article-title":"Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment","volume":"113","author":"Nagy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmab003","article-title":"Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia","volume":"27","author":"Pereira","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02407-1","article-title":"Calcium chloride dihydrate supplementation at ICSI improves fertilization and pregnancy rates in patients with previous low fertilization: a retrospective paired treatment cycle study","volume":"39","author":"Popkiss","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1642","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac074","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes","volume":"37","author":"Rafael","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.05.010","article-title":"Comparison of perinatal outcomes after frozen or fresh embryo transfer: separate analyses of singleton, twin, and sibling live births from a linked national in vitro fertilization registry","volume":"118","author":"Raja","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B24","first-page":"139","article-title":"Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance","volume":"23","author":"Rienzi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2024.104789","article-title":"Cycle management in frozen embryo transfer: the best of all worlds?","volume":"50","author":"Roelens","year":"2025","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045","article-title":"Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer","volume":"103","author":"Roque","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B27","first-page":"e6","article-title":"Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: a population-based cohort study with within-sibship analysis","volume":"80","author":"Sindre","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-019-1429-z","article-title":"Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles","volume":"17","author":"Smith","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2101","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det107","article-title":"Lower intracellular concentration of cryoprotectants after vitrification than after slow freezing despite exposure to higher concentration of cryoprotectant solutions","volume":"28","author":"Vanderzwalmen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.01.021","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a Catalan cohort study based on 14,262 newborns","volume":"107","author":"Vidal","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.013","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"12","author":"von Elm","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13779","article-title":"Maternal vascular health in pregnancy and postpartum after assisted reproduction","volume":"75","author":"von Versen-H\u00f6ynck","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1784","article-title":"Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance","volume":"92","author":"Weston","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1003683","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003683","article-title":"Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: a cohort study with within-sibship analysis","volume":"18","author":"Westvik-Johari","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B35","first-page":"Cd011184","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction","volume":"2","author":"Zaat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.10.020","article-title":"Obstetric complications after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: results from a randomized trial","volume":"109","author":"Zhang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-023-01106-5","article-title":"Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices","volume":"21","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2026012807260098800_hoag002-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2391","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead212","article-title":"Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study","volume":"38","author":"Zou","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag002\/66382180\/hoag002.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/1\/hoag002\/66382180\/hoag002.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/1\/hoag002\/66382180\/hoag002.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T12:26:14Z","timestamp":1769603174000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag002\/8423497"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag002","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2399-3529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"article-number":"hoag002"}}