{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T20:13:28Z","timestamp":1776111208047,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771286400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":47,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund, Swedish Cancer Society, Radiumhemmets Research Funds"},{"name":"Swedish Research Council, ALF Grants from Region Stockholm and Karolinska Institutet research"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Is first-trimester intrauterine growth different between pregnancies resulting in live births established using fresh or frozen single embryo transfers (ET), and is it related to the embryo stage at the timing of transfer?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among pregnancies resulting in live birth, the use of frozen embryo transfer was associated with larger crown\u2013rump length in the first trimester compared with fresh embryo transfer, regardless of the embryo stage at the timing of transfer.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Studies have indicated that singletons born following frozen\/thawed ET have a higher likelihood of increased birthweight, in comparison with children born after fresh ET. A few studies have also suggested greater crown\u2013rump length (CRL) in pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to fresh ET. However, discrepancies exist regarding the intrauterine growth between fresh ET and FET groups, and the knowledge regarding the effect of embryo stage at transfer (cleavage stage vs. blastocyst stage) on the first-trimester growth remains limited.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This prospective cohort study included all single ETs resulting in singleton pregnancies and live births following either FET or fresh ET at an academic reproductive medical center during 2013\u20132024.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among 3445 singleton live births during the study period, 54.3% were after FET, and 62.2% after blastocyst transfer. All underwent an ultrasound scan between 6 and 12 gestational weeks to measure the CRL (mm). Generalized additive models were used to compare the CRL between pregnancies after FET and fresh ET, as well as to investigate associations according to embryo stage at transfer (cleavage stage or blastocyst stage), accounting for multiple confounders.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Compared with pregnancies after fresh ET, the CRL in pregnancies after FET was larger after adjusting for gestational age, embryo stage at transfer, parental age, maternal BMI, and smoking status in the first trimester, though the difference was small (\u03b2\u2009=\u20090.30\u2009mm, 95% CI: 0.00\u20130.60, P\u2009=\u20090.053). The difference remained in subgroups defined by the embryo stage at the timing of transfer (\u03b2\u2009=\u20090.31\u2009mm, 95% CI: \u22120.01\u20130.62, P\u2009=\u20090.055 and \u03b2\u2009=\u20090.22\u2009mm, 95% CI: 0.06\u20130.39, P\u2009=\u20090.008 for cleavage and blastocyst stage, respectively). Normalizing CRL to a reference population conceived naturally from the INTERGROWTH-21(st) project showed that the mean CRL Z-scores in pregnancies after fresh ET and FET were both greater than 0 before day 63, suggesting the CRL in the present study population was larger than that of the non-ART population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The lack of adjustment for other relevant confounders, such as maternal infertility factors, could lead to unmeasured confounding. Additionally, the predominance of fresh embryos in the cleavage-stage ET group limited statistical power.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A difference in the intrauterine growth of singletons born after frozen and fresh ETs appears early. The effect of FET on the CRL is similar regardless of whether cleavage-stage embryo or blastocyst transfer is used. Thus, the selection of embryo stage at the timing of transfer needs to be informed by other clinical factors. Besides, reliance on CRL for redating pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies warrants caution as it may overestimate the gestational age and miss potential growth restriction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund, Swedish Cancer Society, Radiumhemmets Research Funds, The Swedish Research Council, ALF Grants from Region Stockholm, and Karolinska Institutet research grants to KARW. ARP\u202fis supported by fundings of the Beatriz Galindo Program BG23\/00015 with further support from FEDER and UE (PID2024-160756OA-I00) both from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and KI Research Foundation Grants 2024-2025(2024-02566). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this work.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N\/A<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoag014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T12:42:04Z","timestamp":1771072924000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["First trimester growth after fresh or frozen single embryo transfer: embryo cleavage vs blastocyst stages"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2026","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-4914-8282","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mujin","family":"Ye","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]},{"name":"Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9544-1911","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mariana","family":"Tavares Barroso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6638-1895","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna Sara","family":"Oberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nermin","family":"Hadziosmanovic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University , Uppsala,","place":["Sweden"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5820-3490","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Arturo","family":"Reyes Palomares","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]},{"name":"Department of Surgical Specialties, Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of M\u00e1laga , M\u00e1laga,","place":["Spain"]},{"name":"IBIMA (Biomedical Research Institute of M\u00e1laga)-BIONAND Platform, University of M\u00e1laga, Andaluc\u00eda Tech , M\u00e1laga,","place":["Spain"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4378-6181","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kenny A","family":"Rodriguez-Wallberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]},{"name":"Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm,","place":["Sweden"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2025.02.009","article-title":"How many infants have been born with the help of assisted reproductive technology?","volume":"124","author":"Adamson","year":"2025","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1229","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17786","article-title":"Fetal growth after fresh and frozen embryo transfer and natural conception: a population-based register study","volume":"131","author":"Ageheim","year":"2024","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae010","article-title":"ESHRE guideline: number of embryos to transfer during IVF\/ICSI\u2020","volume":"39","author":"Alteri","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.10.039","article-title":"Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in 1,136 singleton pregnancies conceived after programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with natural cycle FET","volume":"115","author":"Asserh\u00f8j","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1468","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.08.014","article-title":"Do frozen embryo transfers modify the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in newborns compared with fresh embryo transfers and natural conceptions?","volume":"116","author":"Barberet","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1002\/bdr2.1219","article-title":"Large for gestational age and macrosomia in singletons born after frozen\/thawed embryo transfer (FET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART)","volume":"110","author":"Berntsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24806","article-title":"Greater estimated fetal weight and birth weight in IVF\/ICSI pregnancy after frozen-thawed vs fresh blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study with novel unified modeling methodology","volume":"60","author":"Cavoretto","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21969","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler in singleton pregnancies conceived after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh vs frozen blastocyst transfer: longitudinal cohort study","volume":"56","author":"Cavoretto","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.035","article-title":"Greater fetal crown-rump length growth with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection conceptions after thawed versus fresh blastocyst transfers: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study","volume":"116","author":"Cavoretto","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2593","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der251","article-title":"An OHSS-free clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment","volume":"26","author":"Devroey","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464.e461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.10.033","article-title":"First-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index and preeclampsia risk in pregnancies after artificial frozen embryo transfer: analysis of over 27,000 pregnancies","volume":"232","author":"Donno","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13235","article-title":"Weekend-free scheduled IVF\/ICSI procedures and single embryo transfer do not reduce live-birth rates in a general infertile population","volume":"96","author":"Feichtinger","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2011.04.004","article-title":"Uterine artery blood flow volume in pregnant women with an abnormal pulsatility index of the uterine arteries delivering normal or intrauterine growth restricted newborns","volume":"32","author":"Ferrazzi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B15","first-page":"50","article-title":"Imprinted genes, placental development and fetal growth","volume":"65","author":"Fowden","year":"2006","journal-title":"Horm Res"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126.e121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.010","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: increased risks in programmed cycles","volume":"221","author":"Ginstr\u00f6m Ernstad","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1177\/096228029500400302","article-title":"Generalized additive models for medical research","volume":"4","author":"Hastie","year":"1995","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.03.028","article-title":"Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization","volume":"97","author":"Imudia","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2012.03.001","article-title":"Imprinted gene expression in fetal growth and development","volume":"33","author":"Lambertini","year":"2012","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1038\/375034a0","article-title":"Disruption of imprinting caused by deletion of the H19 gene region in mice","volume":"375","author":"Leighton","year":"1995","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-024-01241-7","article-title":"Safety of embryo cryopreservation: insights from mid-term placental transcriptional changes","volume":"22","author":"Luo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1987","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew173","article-title":"No change in live birthweight of IVF singleton deliveries over an 18-year period despite significant clinical and laboratory changes","volume":"31","author":"Maas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2575","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13092575","article-title":"Comparison of Fetal Crown-Rump Length Measurements between Thawed and Fresh Embryo Transfer","volume":"13","author":"Mitta","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13448","article-title":"International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy","volume":"44","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex095","article-title":"Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer","volume":"32","author":"Pereira","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.01.002","article-title":"Association of duration of embryo culture with risk of large for gestational age delivery in cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles","volume":"121","author":"Pier","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer","volume":"97","author":"Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"881550","DOI":"10.3389\/fcell.2022.881550","article-title":"Update on the epigenomic implication of embryo cryopreservation methods applied in assisted reproductive technologies with potential long-term health effects","volume":"10","author":"Reyes Palomares","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Cell Dev Biol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A critical evaluation of sonar \"crown-rump length\" measurements","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2022.4787","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton births following single- vs double-embryo transfer in Sweden","volume":"177","author":"Rodriguez-Wallberg","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-014-0391-0","article-title":"Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?","volume":"32","author":"Roque","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","article-title":"Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Roque","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003","article-title":"Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"99","author":"Roque","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoab021","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab021","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification","volume":"2021","author":"Saket","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des036","article-title":"Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved\/thawed embryos","volume":"27","author":"Sazonova","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2953","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03287-3","article-title":"Cryopreservation, cryoprotectants, and potential risk of epigenetic alteration","volume":"41","author":"Sciorio","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70028","DOI":"10.1002\/rfc2.70028","article-title":"First trimester fetal growth in pregnancies after single embryo transfer: a prospective longitudinal observational study comparing embryo size to established growth curves","volume":"4","author":"Seljeflot","year":"2025","journal-title":"Reprod Female Child Health"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1159\/000468935","article-title":"Fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer compared to natural conception: differences in perinatal outcome","volume":"82","author":"Spijkers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa304","article-title":"High birth weight and large-for-gestational-age in singletons born after frozen compared to fresh embryo transfer, by gestational week: a Nordic register study from the CoNARTaS group","volume":"36","author":"Terho","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1120-x","article-title":"First trimester pregnancy ultrasound findings as a function of method of conception in an infertile population","volume":"35","author":"von Versen-H\u00f6ynck","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1003683","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003683","article-title":"Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: a cohort study with within-sibship analysis","volume":"18","author":"Westvik-Johari","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1016\/j.stem.2023.09.010","article-title":"Epigenetic regulation of early human embryo development","volume":"30","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cell Stem Cell"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2024.100334","article-title":"The difference in early trimester fetal growth between singletons after frozen embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer","volume":"4","author":"Yang","year":"2024","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"key":"2026041314444817100_hoag014-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det460","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture period on birthweight of singleton newborns","volume":"29","author":"Zhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag014\/66966742\/hoag014.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/2\/hoag014\/66966742\/hoag014.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/2\/hoag014\/66966742\/hoag014.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T18:44:58Z","timestamp":1776105898000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag014\/8489046"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag014","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2399-3529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"article-number":"hoag014"}}