{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T16:18:32Z","timestamp":1783700312335,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":165,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"NHS Grampian Charities Small Research","award":["SRG 24-30"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SRG 24-30"]}]},{"name":"NHS Research Scotland, through NHS Grampian"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Can a model be developed to predict natural conception leading to live birth over a period of 12\u2009months in couples with different causes of infertility?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We developed and validated a novel clinical prediction model that can be used to provide individualized estimates of the chance of a natural conception (leading to live birth) over a 12-month period for couples with different causes of infertility, including tubal factor, anovulation, male factor, unexplained, other (cervical, uterine, or sexual factor), and endometriosis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Existing prediction models for natural conception are primarily aimed at infertile couples with no identified cause (unexplained), mild male factor, or minimal endometriosis. Currently, there is no available model that is applicable across a wide range of fertility diagnoses at the point of initial assessment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A population-based cohort study based on data from a single large tertiary UK fertility centre serving the entirety of the North of Scotland, including all 9757 couples who registered at the clinic for the first time from 1998 to 2015.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Using a Cox proportional hazards survival model, we estimated the chance of conception within the first year from diagnosis of infertility leading to live birth. The predictive accuracy of the model was assessed using discrimination and calibration measures in an internal validation. The clinical utility of the model was assessed using decision curve analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>After exclusions, 7086 couples with infertility were included, of whom 891 (13%) had a natural conception within 1 year of diagnosis leading to live birth. Longer duration of infertility [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57\u20130.72)], increasing female age [0.62 (0.55\u20130.70)], and tubal infertility [0.62 (0.47\u20130.81)] had the strongest influence on reducing the chance of natural conception within 1 year leading to live birth. Conversely, previous pregnancy [1.30 (1.12\u20131.50)] and unexplained infertility [1.29 (1.00\u20131.67)] were most strongly associated with increased chances of live birth. For example, a 25-year-old woman with 1 year of secondary unexplained infertility has a 33.8% predicted chance of having a baby resulting from natural conception within a year of diagnosis. In contrast, a 35-year-old woman with tubal infertility and 1 year of primary infertility has an estimated 6.0% predicted chance of live birth over a similar time horizon. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination (optimism-corrected C-statistic 0.645) and good calibration in internal validation. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that applying the model at a 20% probability threshold would correctly identify an additional 7.2 couples per 100 as being likely to benefit from fertility treatment when compared against a \u2018treat-all\u2019 policy, which incorrectly assumes that all couples would benefit from fertility treatment. A freely available online calculator was constructed from the model formula to generate individual estimates of the chance of live birth following natural conception.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The data used to inform this model were collected from a single centre until 2016, limiting generalizability. Any information not collected in this dataset, such as markers of ovarian reserve, severity of endometriosis, or subtype of ovulatory disorder, could not be included and may have improved the accuracy of the model predictions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As we have demonstrated that couples diagnosed with infertility can conceive on their own, knowledge of their individual chances of having a baby can clarify the net value of active treatment, including assisted reproduction. Use of this model via the online calculator could improve the quality of decision-making around the nature and timing of initiating fertility treatment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>FUNDING<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This work was funded in part by an NHS Grampian Charities Small Research Grant awarded to N.J.C, grant number SRG 24-30. We acknowledge the associated financial support of NHS Research Scotland, through NHS Grampian investment in the Grampian DaSH.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>DISCLOSURES<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N.J.C has no conflict of interest to declare. K.B. declares a previous role as Founder of the Fertility Alliance (charity) and receipt of speaker fees\/honoraria from Merck and IBSA (paid to the Fertility Alliance). D.J.M. reports consulting fees from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) (paid to institution), honoraria from Merck for a fertility prediction modelling workshop, and financial support from ESHRE, Merck and IVIRMA to present at scientific conferences. S.B. reports royalties\/licenses from Cambridge University Press, consulting fees from Merck, Ferring and Organon (paid to S.B. and to the institution), speaker fees\/honoraria from Merck (paid to S.B. and to the institution), support for attending meetings\/travel from Merck, and a leadership role as Board Member of the Fertility Alliance (charity).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoag056","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T05:24:16Z","timestamp":1781501056000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Predicting natural conception leading to live birth for couples with infertility: a single-centre population-based cohort study of 7086 couples"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2026","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1892-969X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Natalie J","family":"Cameron","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Centre for Women\u2019s Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kate","family":"Brian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Fertility Alliance , London,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8905-2429","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David J","family":"McLernon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4588-356X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Siladitya","family":"Bhattacharya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.09.035","article-title":"Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system","volume":"94","author":"Adamson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.1.173","article-title":"Time to pregnancy in relation to semen quality assessed by CASA before and after sperm separation","volume":"17","author":"Andersen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyv356","article-title":"Data Resource Profile: The Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND)","volume":"45","author":"Ayorinde","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2057","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(24)00550-6","article-title":"Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950\u20132021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021","volume":"403","author":"Bhattacharjee","year":"2024","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1081\/PRG-200059873","article-title":"The incidence of severe complications of preeclampsia","volume":"24","author":"Bhattacharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hypertens Pregnancy"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.10.022","article-title":"Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study","volume":"101","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B2620272","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57650-X","article-title":"The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples","volume":"64","author":"Collins","year":"1995","journal-title":"Fertility and Sterility"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B6687691","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e078378","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-078378","article-title":"TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods","volume":"385","author":"Collins","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1774","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep109","article-title":"Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine","volume":"24","author":"Coppus","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoac051","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac051","article-title":"Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990\u20132021: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2022","author":"Cox","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13584","article-title":"Obstetric consequences of subfertility: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"123","author":"DoPierala","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1627","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den132","article-title":"Pregnancy chances on an IVF\/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study","volume":"23","author":"Eijkemans","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1470","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez099","article-title":"Treatment-independent live birth after in-vitro fertilisation: a retrospective cohort study of 2,133 women","volume":"34","author":"ElMokhallalati","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B12","author":"HFEA","year":"2024"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2019","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh365","article-title":"Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models","volume":"19","author":"Hunault","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu262","article-title":"Overtreatment in couples with unexplained infertility","volume":"30","author":"Kersten","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.11.025","article-title":"Follow up of infertile patients after failed ART cycles: a preliminary report from Iran and Turkey","volume":"161","author":"Khalili","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.06.035","article-title":"Can semen parameters predict pregnancy outcomes?","volume":"120","author":"Lamb","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.03.021","article-title":"Reproducibility and reliability of repeated semen analyses in male partners of subfertile couples","volume":"94","author":"Leushuis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu082","article-title":"Semen analysis and prediction of natural conception","volume":"29","author":"Leushuis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.7326\/M22-0844","article-title":"Assessing performance and clinical usefulness in prediction models with survival outcomes: practical guidance for cox proportional hazards models","volume":"176","author":"McLernon","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez049","article-title":"Predicting the chances of having a baby with or without treatment at different time points in couples with unexplained subfertility","volume":"34","author":"McLernon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i5735","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i5735","article-title":"Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women","volume":"355","author":"McLernon","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B22","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence","year":"2025"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B23","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence","year":"2017"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B24","author":"National Records of Scotland","year":"2025"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B25","author":"NVOG","year":"2020"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2199","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu184","article-title":"Cost of fertility treatment and live birth outcome in women of different ages and BMI","volume":"29","author":"Pandey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1944","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh857","article-title":"A qualitative study of women\u2019s decision-making at the end of IVF treatment","volume":"20","author":"Peddie","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B28","author":"Population Health Monitoring Group","year":"2025"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem398","article-title":"Helping themselves to get pregnant: a qualitative longitudinal study on the information-seeking behaviour of infertile couples","volume":"23","author":"Porter","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00417-8","article-title":"Spontaneous conception after the birth of infants conceived through in vitro fertilization treatment","volume":"71","author":"Shimizu","year":"1999","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoac046","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac046","article-title":"Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility?","volume":"2022","author":"Shingshetty","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3294-8_6","volume-title":"Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model","author":"Therneau","year":"2000"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4154","article-title":"On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data","volume":"30","author":"Uno","year":"2011","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1198\/016214507000000149","article-title":"Evaluating Prediction Rules for t-Year Survivors With Censored Regression Models","volume":"102","author":"Uno","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew309","article-title":"Natural conception: repeated predictions over time","volume":"32","author":"van Eekelen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4671","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6280","article-title":"Correcting for the dependent competing risk of treatment using inverse probability of censoring weighting and copulas in the estimation of natural conception chances","volume":"33","author":"van Geloven","year":"2014","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2026071011565829900_hoag056-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i6","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i6","article-title":"Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests","volume":"352","author":"Vickers","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag056\/68524537\/hoag056.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/3\/hoag056\/68524537\/hoag056.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article-pdf\/2026\/3\/hoag056\/68524537\/hoag056.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T15:57:09Z","timestamp":1783699029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/hropen\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag056\/8707848"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoag056","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-3529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2399-3529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"article-number":"hoag056"}}