{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T13:59:57Z","timestamp":1778853597811,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]],"date-time":"2020-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598572800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"NMS Biomedical SA, Switzerland"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Does follicular flushing increase the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF?<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Follicular flushing increases the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Flushing increases neither the oocyte yield nor the pregnancy rate in polyfollicular IVF or in poor responder patients. In monofollicular IVF, the effect of flushing has so far been addressed by two studies: (i) a prospective study with minimal stimulation IVF demonstrated an increased oocyte yield, and (ii) a retrospective study with natural cycle (NC)-IVF showed an increased oocyte yield and an increased transfer rate.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Randomized controlled trial including 164 women who were randomized for either aspiration with or without flushing from 2016 to 2019.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Infertile women 18\u201342 years of age with an indication for IVF treatment at a university-based infertility unit. Women undergoing monofollicular IVF were randomized to either follicular aspiration only or follicular aspiration directly followed by five follicular flushes at a 1:1 ratio. The intervention was done without anaesthesia, using a gauge 19 single-lumen needle. Flushing volume was calculated (sphere formula) based on the size of the follicle.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A total of 164 women were included; 81 were allocated to \u2018aspiration only\u2019 and 83 to additional \u2018flushing\u2019. Primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat: oocyte yield, defined as the collected mature oocyte rate, was higher (n\u2009=\u200964\/83, 77.1%) in the flushing group compared to the aspiration only group (n\u2009=\u200948\/81, 59.3%, adjusted risk difference (RD): 18.2% (95% CI 3.9\u201331.7%), P-value\u2009=\u20090.02). In the flushing group, most oocytes were retrieved within the first three flushes (63\/83, 75.8%). Fertilization rate was higher in the flushing group (n\u2009=\u200953\/83, 63.9% vs n\u2009=\u200938\/81, 46.9%; adjusted RD: 16.8% (96% CI 1.5\u201331.4%), P\u2009=\u20090.045). Transfer rate was also higher in the flushing group (n\u2009=\u200952\/83, 62.7% vs n\u2009=\u200938\/81, 46.9%; RD: 15.71 (95% CI 0.3\u201330.3%)), but the difference was not significant (P\u2009=\u20090.06). The clinical pregnancy rate n\u2009=\u20099\/83 versus n\u2009=\u20099\/81 (RD: \u22120.3% (95% CI \u22129.9% to 9.5%)) and live birth rate n\u2009=\u20097\/83 versus n\u2009=\u20098\/81 (RD: \u22121.5% (95% CI \u221210.4% to 7.1%)) were not significantly different between the flushing and the aspiration group. The median duration of the intervention was significantly longer with flushing (2.38 min; quartiles 2.0, 2.7) versus aspiration only (0.43 min; quartiles 0.3, 0.5) (P\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.01). There was no significant difference in the mean (\u00b1SD) visual analogue scales pain score between the follicular flushing (3.4\u2009\u00b1\u20091.8) and the aspiration group (3.1\u2009\u00b1\u20091.89).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Blinding of the procedure was not possible.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Our study proved that flushing of single follicles in NC-IVF increases the oocyte yield. In contrast to polyfollicular IVF flushing seems to be beneficial in a monofollicular setting if the technique used in our study (single-lumen needle, 5 flushings with flushing volume adaptation) is applied.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The study was funded by the financial sources of the division and in part by a research grant provided by NMS Biomedical SA, Switzerland. The company did not have any roles in design or conduct of the study or in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no other conflicts of interest.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT 02641808.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>29 December 2015<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>DATE OF FIRST PATIENT\u2019S ENROLMENT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>22 August 2016<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa165","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,21]],"date-time":"2020-06-21T19:13:38Z","timestamp":1592766818000},"page":"2253-2261","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Follicular flushing leads to higher oocyte yield in monofollicular IVF: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"A S","family":"Kohl Schwartz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"Calzaferri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Roumet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Limacher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Fink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Wueest","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Weidlinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"V R","family":"Mitter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B","family":"Leeners","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Von Wolff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B99","volume":"16"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1616","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der092","article-title":"ESHRE consensus on the definition of \u2018poor response\u2019 to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria","volume":"26","author":"Ferraretti","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B2","first-page":"CD004634","article-title":"Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques","volume":"4","author":"Georgiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14629","article-title":"Direct aspiration versus follicular flushing in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"124","author":"Haydardedeoglu","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2373","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des174","article-title":"The use of follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Levy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.12.043","article-title":"A multicenter prospective study to assess the effect of early cleavage on embryo quality, implantation, and live-birth rate","volume":"101","author":"De Los Santos","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2006.09.004","article-title":"[The follicular flushing duplicate the pregnancy rate on semi natural cycle IVF]","volume":"36","author":"M\u00e9ndez Lozano","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2990","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det350","article-title":"Follicular flushing and in vitro fertilization outcomes in the poorest responders: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Mok-Lin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.2307\/2530245","article-title":"A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials","volume":"35","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"1979","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9869-9","article-title":"Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Roque","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B98","volume":"1"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-0991-6","article-title":"Effect of follicular flushing on reproductive outcomes in patients with poor ovarian response undergoing assisted reproductive technology","volume":"34","author":"Souza","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54806-7","article-title":"A prospective study to investigate the value of flushing follicles during transvaginal ultrasound-directed follicle aspiration","volume":"57","author":"Waterstone","year":"1992","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex019","article-title":"Randomized, open trial comparing a modified double-lumen needle follicular flushing system with a single-lumen aspiration needle in IVF patients with poor ovarian response","volume":"32","author":"Von Horn","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12054","article-title":"Follicle flushing in monofollicular in vitro fertilization almost doubles the number of transferable embryos","volume":"92","author":"von Wolff","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.04.003","article-title":"Follicular flushing in natural cycle IVF does not affect the luteal phase\u2014a prospective controlled study","volume":"35","author":"von Wolff","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.04.013","article-title":"Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF","volume":"29","author":"von Wolff","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2020092514445293500_deaa165-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-018-0681-2","article-title":"Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"18","author":"Xiao","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/35\/10\/2253\/33793401\/deaa165.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/35\/10\/2253\/33793401\/deaa165.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T18:45:20Z","timestamp":1601059520000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/35\/10\/2253\/5898361"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa165","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]}}}