{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T07:20:29Z","timestamp":1788592829453,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]],"date-time":"2021-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610150400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001826","name":"The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["171101007"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["171101007"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001826","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,18]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n Is IVF with frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (freeze-all strategy) more effective than IVF with fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (conventional strategy)?<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n The freeze-all strategy was inferior to the conventional strategy in terms of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per woman.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n IVF without transfer of fresh embryos, thus with frozen-thawed embryo transfer only (freeze-all strategy), is increasingly being used in clinical practice because of a presumed benefit. It is still unknown whether this new IVF strategy increases IVF efficacy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n A single-centre, open label, two arm, parallel group, randomised controlled superiority trial was conducted. The trial was conducted between January 2013 and July 2015 in the Netherlands. The intervention was one IVF cycle with frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer(s) versus one IVF cycle with fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer(s). The primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy resulting from one IVF cycle within 12\u2009months after randomisation. Couples were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the freeze-all strategy or the conventional strategy with an online randomisation programme just before the start of down-regulation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n Participants were subfertile couples with any indication for IVF undergoing their first IVF cycle, with a female age between 18 and 43\u2009years. Differences in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates were expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% CI. All outcomes were analysed following the intention-to-treat principle.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n Two-hundred-and-five couples were randomly assigned to the freeze-all strategy (n\u2009=\u2009102) or to the conventional strategy (n\u2009=\u2009102). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per woman was significantly lower in women allocated to the freeze-all strategy (19\/102 (19%)) compared to women allocated to the conventional strategy (32\/102 (31%); RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.36\u20130.98).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n As this was a single-centre study, we were unable to study differences in study protocols and clinic performance. This, and the limited sample size, should make one cautious in using the results as the basis for definitive policy. All patients undergoing IVF, including those with a poor prognosis, were included; therefore, the outcome could differ in women with a good prognosis of IVF treatment success.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n Our results indicate that there might be no benefit of a freeze-all strategy in terms of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates. The efficacy of the freeze-all strategy in subgroups of patients, different stages of embryo development, and different freezing protocols needs to be further established and balanced against potential benefits and harms for mothers and children.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW grant 171101007). S.M., F.M. and M.v.W. stated they are authors of the Cochrane review \u2018Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction\u2019.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n Dutch Trial Register, NTR3187<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE<\/jats:title>\n 9 December 2011<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n DATE OF FIRST PATIENT\u2019S ENROLMENT<\/jats:title>\n 8 January 2013<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,23]],"date-time":"2020-10-23T15:12:13Z","timestamp":1603465933000},"page":"998-1006","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"K M","family":"Wong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"van Wely","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H R","family":"Verhoeve","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E M","family":"Kaaijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F","family":"van der Veen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Repping","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"},{"name":"National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Mastenbroek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.29252\/ijrm.16.1.9","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: a randomized, multi-center study","volume":"16","author":"Aflatoonian","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Biomed"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.29252\/ijrm.15.12.757","article-title":"In vitro fertilization outcome in frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with elevated progesterone level on the day of HCG injection: an RCT","volume":"15","author":"Aghahosseini","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Biomed"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01139189","article-title":"Elective preembryo cryopreservation in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome","volume":"6","author":"Amso","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.05.024","article-title":"Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization?","volume":"102","author":"Barnhart","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B50313989","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.047","article-title":"Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper","volume":"101","author":"Braakhekke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome","volume":"375","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022","article-title":"Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"107","author":"Coates","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2593","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der251","article-title":"An OHSS-free clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment","volume":"26","author":"Devroey","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.6.1457","article-title":"Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety","volume":"14","author":"Ferraretti","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B9","volume-title":"In-Vitro Culture of Human Blastocysts","author":"Gardner","year":"1999"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01135678","article-title":"Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF","volume":"7","author":"Gonen","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014","article-title":"Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method","volume":"67","author":"Kuwayama","year":"2007","journal-title":"Theriogenology"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61169-8","article-title":"Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination","volume":"11","author":"Kuwayama","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des386","article-title":"Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?","volume":"28","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der050","article-title":"Embryo selection in IVF","volume":"26","author":"Mastenbroek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B16","author":"NVOG","year":"2011"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57184-2","article-title":"Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome","volume":"62","author":"Pattinson","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618","article-title":"Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment","volume":"2","author":"Puissant","year":"1987","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)58275-2","article-title":"Comparison of intravenous albumin and transfer of fresh embryos with cryopreservation of all embryos for subsequent transfer in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome","volume":"65","author":"Shaker","year":"1996","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050","article-title":"Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders","volume":"96","author":"Shapiro","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059","article-title":"Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders","volume":"96","author":"Shapiro","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(14)50063-6","article-title":"Examining the evidence: progesterone supplementation during fresh and frozen embryo transfer","volume":"29","author":"Shapiro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334","article-title":"Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women","volume":"378","author":"Shi","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6874-12-29","article-title":"The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"van Tilborg","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2485","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex321","article-title":"Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF\/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"32","author":"van Tilborg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1703768","article-title":"IVF transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries","volume":"378","author":"Vuong","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32843-5","article-title":"Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"Wei","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates","volume":"102","author":"Wong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021031813492455200_deaa305-B29","first-page":"CD011184","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction","volume":"28","author":"Wong","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/4\/998\/36637899\/deaa305.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/4\/998\/36637899\/deaa305.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,18]],"date-time":"2021-03-18T09:49:48Z","timestamp":1616060988000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/36\/4\/998\/6072575"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,18]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,9]]}}}