{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T23:49:28Z","timestamp":1783640968776,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,21]],"date-time":"2021-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621555200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R03HD097287"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R03HD097287"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Has there been there a temporal change in time-to-pregnancy (TTP) in the USA.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Overall, TTP was stable over time, but a longer TTP for women over 30 and parous women was identified.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Fertility rates in the USA have declined over the past several years. Although these trends have been attributed to changing reproductive intentions, it is unclear whether declining fecundity (the biologic ability to reproduce measured by TTP in the current report) may also play a role. Indeed, trends based on declining sperm quality and higher utilisation of infertility treatment suggest fecundity may be falling.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This cross-sectional survey data from the National Survey of Family Growth was administered from 2002 to 2017. The surveys are based on nationally representative samples of reproductive-aged women in the USA. Interviews were conducted in person or through computer-assisted self-administration of sensitive questions.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The study included women who self-reported time spent trying to become pregnant allowing utilisation of the current duration approach to estimate the total duration of pregnancy attempt (i.e. TTP). In all, 1202 participants were analysed over each study period. To estimate a TTP distribution overall and by parity, we used a piecewise constant proportional hazards model that accounts for digit preference. Accelerated-failure-time regression models, which were weighted to account for the sampling design, were used to estimate time ratios (TRs). Models were adjusted for age, BMI, race, education, relationship status, parity, pelvic inflammatory disease treatment and any reproductive problems.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Of the participants analysed, the average age was 31.8 and BMI was 28.6, which was similar across the survey periods. Relationship status was the only demographic characteristic that changed over time. All other variables remained constant across the study periods. Overall, TRs comparing TTP between 2002 and 2017 increased slightly (TR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04). When stratified by parity, parous women had a longer TTP over the later years of the study (TR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06). TTP remained constant for nulliparous women. Similarly, TTP also increased over time for women over age thirty (TR: 1.02, 1.00, 1.05) but not for women under age thirty.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Small changes in data collection over time may have impacted the findings. We accounted for this in sensitivity analyses using imputed data. Overall, TRs were slightly attenuated using the imputed data, but represented similar patterns to the original data. Results for parous women and women over 30 remained consistent in the sensitivity analyses.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Consistent with reports of falling fertility rates and sperm counts, this study suggests parous and older couples in the USA may be taking longer to become pregnant. Although trends were suggestive of a small overall increase in TTP, particularly for parous women and women over age thirty, additional data are needed to attempt to understand these trends given the societal, economic and public health implications related to fecundity.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health grant R03HD097287 to A.C.M. There are no competing interests.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab107","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,16]],"date-time":"2021-04-16T18:01:25Z","timestamp":1618596085000},"page":"2331-2338","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Trends in time-to-pregnancy in the USA: 2002 to 2017"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5482-0141","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael L","family":"Eisenberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marie E","family":"Thoma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shufeng","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander C","family":"McLain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.06.011","article-title":"The challenge and enjoyment of the interpretation of epidemiologic data","volume":"86","author":"Barnhart","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chemosphere.2012.01.017","article-title":"Heavy metals and couple fecundity, the LIFE Study","volume":"87","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Chemosphere"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B3","first-page":"1","article-title":"Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth","volume":"67","author":"Chandra","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e31818ef47e","article-title":"Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy","volume":"20","author":"Cooney","year":"2009","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2872","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det293","article-title":"Cumulative incidence rate of medical consultation for fecundity problems\u2013analysis of a prevalent cohort using competing risks","volume":"28","author":"Duron","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1506575","article-title":"Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011","volume":"374","author":"Finer","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2080","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.08.024","article-title":"The hidden infertile: infertile women without pregnancy intent in the United States","volume":"93","author":"Greil","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.027","article-title":"The decline of infertility: apparent or real?","volume":"86","author":"Guzick","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B9","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2014","volume":"64","author":"Hamilton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh723","article-title":"Time trends in waiting time to pregnancy among Danish twins","volume":"20","author":"Jensen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwt048","article-title":"Time trends in biological fertility in Western Europe","volume":"178","author":"Joffe","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.49.3.314","article-title":"A time to pregnancy questionnaire designed for long term recall: validity in Oxford, England","volume":"49","author":"Joffe","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1961","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02328-X","article-title":"Time trends in biological fertility in Britain","volume":"355","author":"Joffe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.015","article-title":"Association between use of marijuana and time to pregnancy in men and women: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth","volume":"109","author":"Kasman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/3.4.565","article-title":"Estimating time to pregnancy from current durations in a cross-sectional sample","volume":"3","author":"Keiding","year":"2002","journal-title":"Biostatistics"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2110","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex267","article-title":"The age of fathers in the USA is rising: an analysis of 168 867 480 births from 1972 to 2015","volume":"32","author":"Khandwala","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B17","first-page":"1","article-title":"The 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey","volume":"150","author":"Lepkowski","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat 2"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx022","article-title":"Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis","volume":"23","author":"Levine","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2047-2927.2013.00110.x","article-title":"The prevalence of couple infertility in the United States from a male perspective: evidence from a nationally representative sample","volume":"1","author":"Louis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B20","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births in the United States, 2018","volume":"346","author":"Martin","year":"2019","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B21","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2012","volume":"62","author":"Martin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B22","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2018","volume":"68","author":"Martin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B23","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births in the United States, 2019","volume":"387","author":"Martin","year":"2020","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B24","first-page":"1","article-title":"Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2011-2015","volume":"113","author":"Martinez","year":"2018","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Mean age of mother, 1970-2000","volume":"51","author":"Mathews","year":"2002","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B26","first-page":"1","article-title":"Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000-2014","volume":"232","author":"Mathews","year":"2016","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3961","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6216","article-title":"Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting","volume":"33","author":"McLain","year":"2014","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.026","article-title":"Estimating infertility: the devil is in the details","volume":"86","author":"Olive","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B29","volume-title":"Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys","author":"Rubin","year":"2004"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e31816334ad","article-title":"Time trends in human fecundability in Sweden","volume":"19","author":"Scheike","year":"2008","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ede.0000221781.15114.88","article-title":"Feasibility of the current-duration approach to studying human fecundity","volume":"17","author":"Slama","year":"2006","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B32","first-page":"499","article-title":"Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer","volume":"32","author":"Smarr","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.ss6703a1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2014United States, 2015","volume":"67","author":"Sunderam","year":"2018","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037","article-title":"Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach","volume":"99","author":"Thoma","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.028","article-title":"Impact of subgroup analysis on estimates of infertility","volume":"86","author":"Thornton","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0165097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0165097","article-title":"Improved fecundity in Northern China: a secular trend from 1980 to 2003","volume":"11","author":"Tian","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780120906","article-title":"Pitfalls inherent in retrospective time-to-event studies: the example of time to pregnancy","volume":"12","author":"Weinberg","year":"1993","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780130528","article-title":"Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy","volume":"13","author":"Weinberg","year":"1994","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.2307\/2531205","article-title":"The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies","volume":"42","author":"Weinberg","year":"1986","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00128.x","article-title":"Accelerated failure-time mover-stayer regression models for the analysis of last-episode data","volume":"33","author":"Yamaguchi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Sociol Methodol"},{"key":"2021071919595803700_deab107-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/21.6.1151","article-title":"Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability","volume":"21","author":"Zielhuis","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/8\/2331\/39118956\/deab107.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/8\/2331\/39118956\/deab107.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]],"date-time":"2021-07-19T20:02:06Z","timestamp":1626724926000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/36\/8\/2331\/6280173"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,21]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deab107","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,21]]}}}