{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T11:05:18Z","timestamp":1790939118499,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,7]],"date-time":"2021-06-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623024000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"NIH","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title><jats:p>What thresholds for total sperm count, sperm concentration, progressive motility, and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMC) are associated with earlier time-to-conception in couples undergoing fertility evaluation?<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title><jats:p>Values well above the World Health Organization (WHO) references for total sperm count, concentration, and progressive motility, and values up to 100 million for TPMC were consistently associated with earlier time-to-conception and higher conception rates.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title><jats:p>Although individual semen parameters are generally not able to distinguish between fertile and infertile men, they can provide clinically useful information on time-to-pregnancy for counseling patients seeking fertility treatment. Compared to the conventional semen parameters, TPMC might be a better index for evaluating the severity of male infertility.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title><jats:p>We used data from a longitudinal cohort study on subfertile men from 2002 to 2017 and included 6061 men with initial semen analysis (SA) in the study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Men from subfertile couples who underwent a SA within the study period were included, and 5-year follow-up data were collected to capture conception data. Couples were further categorized into two subgroups: natural conception (n\u2009=\u20095126), after separating those who achieved conception using ART or IUI; natural conception without major female factor (n\u2009=\u20093753), after separating those with severe female factor infertility diagnoses. TPMC was calculated by multiplying the semen volume (ml) by sperm concentration (million\/ml) and the percentage of progressively motile sperm (%). Cox proportional hazard models were used to report hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs before and after adjusting for male age, the number of previous children before the first SA, and income. Using the regression tree method, we calculated thresholds for total sperm count, sperm concentration, progressive motility, and TPMC to best differentiate those who were more likely to conceive within 5\u2009years after first SA from those less likely to conceive. We also plotted continuous values of semen parameters in predicting 5-year conception rates and time-to-conception.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title><jats:p>Overall, the median time to conception was 22\u2009months (95% CI: 21\u201323). A total of 3957 (65%) couples were known to have achieved conception within 5\u2009years of the first SA. These patients were younger and had higher values of sperm concentration, progressive motility, and TPMC. In the overall cohort, a TPMC of 50 million best differentiated men who were more likely to father a child within 5\u2009years. Partners of men with TPMC \u226550 million had a 45% greater chance of conception within 5\u2009years in the adjusted model (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.34\u20131.58) and achieved pregnancy earlier compared to those men with TPMC\u2009&amp;lt;\u200950 million (median 19\u2009months (95% CI: 18\u201320) versus 36\u2009months (95% CI: 32\u201341)). Similar results were observed in the natural conception cohort. For the natural conception cohort without major female factor, the TPMC cut-off was 20 million. In the visual assessment of the graphs for the continuous semen parameter values, 5-year conception rates and time-to-conception consistently plateaued at higher values of sperm concentration, total sperm count, progressive motility, and TPMC compared to the WHO reference levels and our calculated thresholds. For TPMC, values up to 100\u2013150 million were still associated with a better conception rate and time-to-conception in the visual assessment of the curves.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was limited information on female partners and potential for inaccuracies in capturing less severe female infertility diagnoses. Also we lacked details on assisted pregnancies achieved outside of our healthcare network (with possible miscoding as \u2018natural conception\u2019 in our cohort). We only used the initial SA and sperm morphology, another potentially important parameter, was not included in the analyses. We had no information on continuity of pregnancy attempts\/intention, which could affect the time-to-conception data. Finally, most couples had been attempting conception for &amp;gt;12\u2009months prior to initiating fertility treatment, so it is likely that we are underestimating time to conception. Importantly, our data might lack the generalizability to other populations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our results suggest that a TPMC threshold of 50 million sperm provided the best predictive power to estimate earlier time-to-conception in couples evaluated for male factor infertility. Higher values of sperm count, concentration and progressive motility beyond the WHO references were still associated with better conception rates and time-to-conception. This provides an opportunity to optimize semen parameters in those with semen values that are low but not abnormal according to the WHO reference values. These data can be used to better inform patients regarding their chances of conception per year when SA results are used for patient counseling.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title><jats:p>None.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title><jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab133","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,10]],"date-time":"2021-05-10T20:24:38Z","timestamp":1620678278000},"page":"2121-2133","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Semen parameter thresholds and time-to-conception in subfertile couples: how high is high enough?"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9006-5809","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sorena","family":"Keihani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren E","family":"Verrilli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chong","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angela P","family":"Presson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0056-196X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heidi A","family":"Hanson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"},{"name":"Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander W","family":"Pastuszak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erica B","family":"Johnstone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James M","family":"Hotaling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01929.x","article-title":"The use of the semen analysis in predicting fertility outcome","volume":"32","author":"Arumugam","year":"1992","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1939-4640.1996.tb01857.x","article-title":"The influence of semen analysis parameters on the fertility potential of infertile couples","volume":"6","author":"Ayala","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Androl"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx021","article-title":"The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance \u2013 challenges and future research opportunities","volume":"23","author":"Barratt","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B8094352","first-page":"227","article-title":"\u2018How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis","volume":"31","author":"Bj\u00f6rndahl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.11.001","article-title":"Are WHO recommendations to perform 2 consecutive semen analyses for reliable diagnosis of male infertility still valid?","volume":"4","author":"Blickenstorfer","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B5","first-page":"47","article-title":"Total motile sperm count: a better way to rate the severity of male factor infertility?","volume":"2","author":"Borges","year":"2016","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1111\/andr.12199","article-title":"Total motile sperm count has a superior predictive value over the WHO 2010 cut-off values for the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles","volume":"4","author":"Borges","year":"2016","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56831-9","article-title":"The relationship between total motile sperm count and the success of intrauterine insemination","volume":"62","author":"Brasch","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B8","volume-title":"Classification and Regression Trees","author":"Breiman","year":"1984"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.10.022","article-title":"Semen quality and time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study","volume":"101","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1136\/amiajnl-2011-000335","article-title":"Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population Database","volume":"19","author":"DuVall","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1388","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa003005","article-title":"Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men","volume":"345","author":"Guzick","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.5455\/medarh.2016.70.39-43","article-title":"The effects of total motile sperm count on spontaneous pregnancy rate and pregnancy after IUI treatment in couples with male factor and unexplained infertility","volume":"70","author":"*Hajder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Arh"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1110","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev058","article-title":"Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system","volume":"30","author":"Hamilton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B14","article-title":"Semen quality and waiting time to pregnancy explored using Association Mining","author":"*Herrera","year":"2020","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02068871","article-title":"The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa","volume":"13","author":"Huang","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2605.1988.tb01011.x","article-title":"Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics","volume":"11","author":"Jouannet","year":"1988","journal-title":"Int J Androl"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.2307\/2532300","article-title":"Relative risk trees for censored survival data","volume":"48","author":"LeBlanc","year":"1992","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B18","first-page":"8847","article-title":"Postwash total motile sperm count: should it be included as a standard male infertility work up","volume":"3","author":"Madbouly","year":"2017","journal-title":"Can J Urol"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.12.025","article-title":"Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles","volume":"111","author":"Mankus","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B20","author":"Michigan Medicine"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2010.226","article-title":"Male factor infertility: a solitary semen analysis can never predict normal fertility","volume":"1","author":"Nagler","year":"2011","journal-title":"Nat Rev Urol"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.10.023","article-title":"Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review","volume":"28","author":"Ombelet","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B23","volume-title":"Male Infertility Treatment","author":"Pacific Fertility Center"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59961-0","article-title":"Do the results of semen analysis predict future fertility? A survival analysis study","volume":"6","author":"Polansky","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B25","first-page":"e18","article-title":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion","volume":"3","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.2.503","article-title":"Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities","volume":"2","author":"Slama","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B27","first-page":"829","article-title":"Interpretation of semen analysis among infertile couples","volume":"8","author":"Small","year":"1987","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)42976-6","article-title":"Relation between indices of semen analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples","volume":"12","author":"Smith","year":"1977","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B29","author":"Therneau","year":"2015"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B30","volume-title":"Semen Analysis;","author":"Utah Center for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2015"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.02.024","article-title":"Role of semen analysis in subfertile couples","volume":"95","author":"van der Steeg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B32","volume-title":"WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2010","edition":"5th edn"},{"key":"2021121001115558700_deab133-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repbio.2019.01.004","article-title":"Predictive factors for biochemical pregnancy in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles","volume":"19","author":"Zanetti","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/8\/2121\/41695065\/deab133.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/8\/2121\/41695065\/deab133.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,3]],"date-time":"2023-11-03T14:57:54Z","timestamp":1699023474000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/36\/8\/2121\/6294420"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,7]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,7]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deab133","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,7]]}}}