{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T01:00:18Z","timestamp":1780102818628,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,22]],"date-time":"2021-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1632268800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>What are couples\u2019 preferences for fresh embryo transfer versus freezing of all embryos followed by frozen embryo transfer and the associated clinical outcomes that may differentiate them?<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Couples\u2019 preferences are driven by anticipated chances of live birth, miscarriage, neonatal complications, and costs but not by the differences in the treatment process (including delay of embryo transfer linked to frozen embryo transfer and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) associated with fresh embryo transfer).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A policy of freezing all embryos followed by transfer of frozen embryos results in livebirth rates which are similar to or higher than those following the transfer of fresh embryos while reducing the risk of OHSS and small for gestational age babies: it can, however, increase the risk of pre-eclampsia and large for gestational age offspring. Hence, the controversy continues over whether to do fresh embryo transfer or freeze all embryos followed by frozen embryo transfer.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) technique to survey infertile couples between August 2018 and January 2019.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We asked IVF na\u00efve couples attending a tertiary referral centre to independently complete a questionnaire with nine hypothetical choice tasks between fresh and frozen embryo transfer. The alternatives varied across the choice occurrences on several attributes including efficacy (live birth rate), safety (miscarriage rate, neonatal complication rate), and cost of treatment. We assumed that a freeze-all strategy prolonged treatment but reduced the risk of OHSS. An error components mixed logit model was used to estimate the relative value (utility) that couples placed on the alternative treatment approaches and the attributes used to describe them. Willingness to pay and marginal rates of substitution between the non-cost attributes were calculated. A total of 360 individual questionnaires were given to 180 couples who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 212 were completed and returned Our study population included 3 same sex couples (2 females and 1 male) and 101 heterosexual couples. Four questionnaires were filled by one partner only. The response rate was 58.8%.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Couples preferred both fresh and frozen embryo transfer (odds ratio 27.93 and 28.06, respectively) compared with no IVF treatment, with no strong preference for fresh over frozen. Couples strongly preferred any IVF technique that offered an increase in live birth rates by 5% (P = 0.006) and 15% (P &amp;lt; 0.0001), reduced miscarriage by 18% (P &amp;lt; 0.0001) and diminished neonatal complications by 10% (P &amp;lt; 0.0001). Respondents were willing to pay an additional \u00a32451 (95% CI 604 \u2212 4299) and \u00a3761 (95% CI 5056\u20139265) for a 5 and 15% increase in the chance of live birth, respectively, regardless of whether this involved fresh or frozen embryos. They required compensation of \u00a35230 (95% CI 3320 \u2212 7141) and \u00a313 245 (95% CI 10 110\u201316 380) to accept a 10 and 25% increase in the risk of neonatal complications, respectively (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Results indicated that couples would be willing to accept a 1.26% (95% CI 1.001 \u2212 1.706) reduction in the live birth rate for a 1% reduction in the risk of neonatal complications per live birth. Older couples appeared to place less emphasis on the risk of neonatal complications than younger couples.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>DCEs can elicit intentions which may not reflect actual behaviour. The external validity of this study is limited by the fact that it was conducted in a single centre with generous public funding for IVF. We cannot rule out the potential for selection or responder bias.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>If a strategy of freeze all was to be implemented it would appear to be acceptable to patients, if either success rates can be improved or neonatal complications reduced. Live birth rates, neonatal complication rates, miscarriage rates, and cost are more likely to drive their preferences than a slight delay in the treatment process. The results of this study have important implications for future economic evaluations of IVF, as they suggest that the appropriate balance needs to be struck between success and safety. A holistic approach incorporating patient preferences for expected clinical outcomes and risks should be taken into consideration for individualized care.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>No external funding was sought for this study. A.M. is the chief investigator of the randomized controlled trial \u2018Freeze all\u2019. S.B. is an Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Graham Scotland reports non-financial support from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, outside the submitted work.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab207","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,11]],"date-time":"2021-09-11T11:09:08Z","timestamp":1631358548000},"page":"2891-2903","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Assessing couples\u2019 preferences for fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a discrete choice experiment"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9982-934X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Baydaa","family":"Abdulrahim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Graham","family":"Scotland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Siladitya","family":"Bhattacharya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3652-2447","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Abha","family":"Maheshwari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2249","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev201","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety as outcome measures in reproductive medicine","volume":"30","author":"Braakhekke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoz034","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoz034","article-title":"The perspective of women with an increased risk of OHSS regarding the safety and burden of IVF: a discrete choice experiment","volume":"2020","author":"Braam","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1080\/13696998.2018.1549055","article-title":"Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment","volume":"22","author":"Botha","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Econ"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1957","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex264","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"32","author":"Calhaz-Jorge","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome","volume":"375","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1107","article-title":"Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles","volume":"98","author":"Cobo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.370","article-title":"Patients' and urologists' preferences for prostate cancer treatment: a discrete choice experiment","volume":"109","author":"De Bekker-Grob","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B8","first-page":"7","article-title":"Risk factors and effective management of preeclampsia","volume":"8","author":"English","year":"2015","journal-title":"Integr Blood Press Control"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X03251245","article-title":"Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats","volume":"23","author":"Frew","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511610356","volume-title":"Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer","author":"Hensher","year":"2005"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1712","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu122","article-title":"The monetary value of patient-centred care: results from a discrete choice experiment in Dutch fertility care","volume":"29","author":"Huppelschoten","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.010","article-title":"Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer","volume":"112","author":"Hwang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1017\/S026646230300062X","article-title":"Do participants understand a stated preference health survey? A qualitative approach to assessing validity","volume":"19","author":"Kenny","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"90","author":"Loutradi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-200826080-00004","article-title":"Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making","volume":"26","author":"Lancsar","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i5735","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i5735","article-title":"Predicting the chances of having a baby after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: analysis of linked cycle data from 113,873 women. 32nd Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Finland","volume":"355","author":"McLernon","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B700","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem431","article-title":"Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility","volume":"23","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-0958-0","article-title":"Risk factors for large-for-gestational age infants in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes","volume":"16","author":"Morrens","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2012.08.2223","article-title":"Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force","volume":"16","author":"Reed Johnson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X0700700306","article-title":"Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood","volume":"7","author":"Risa Hole","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stats J"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","article-title":"Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Roque","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7436.360","article-title":"Discrete choice experiments in health care","volume":"328","author":"Ryan","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-5753-3","volume-title":"Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care","author":"Ryan","year":"2008"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta5050","article-title":"Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques","volume":"5","author":"Ryan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01396.x","article-title":"Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilization","volume":"114","author":"Scotland","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334","article-title":"Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women","volume":"378","author":"Shi","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez006","article-title":"Patients' attitudes and preferences towards a freeze-all strategy in ART treatment","volume":"34","author":"Stormlund","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B29","first-page":"34","author":"Stormlund","year":"2019"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1402","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)05291-9","article-title":"Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment","volume":"348","author":"Templeton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq389","article-title":"Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: A discrete choice experiment in fertility care","volume":"26","author":"van Empel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1159\/000362274","article-title":"Patients' preferences for gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs in in vitro fertilization","volume":"78","author":"van den Wijngaard","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1703768","article-title":"IVF transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries","volume":"378","author":"Vuong","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32843-5","article-title":"Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"Wei","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hox021","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hox021","article-title":"Women's perspectives on ovulation induction with or without IUI as treatment for normogonadotrophic anovulation: a discrete choice experiment","volume":"2017","author":"Weiss","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B36","first-page":"CD011184","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction","volume":"3","author":"Wong","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2021111806384990200_deab207-B37","first-page":"CD011184","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction","volume":"2","author":"Zaat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/11\/2891\/41165133\/deab207.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/36\/11\/2891\/41165133\/deab207.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,18]],"date-time":"2021-11-18T09:31:54Z","timestamp":1637227914000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/36\/11\/2891\/6373882"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,22]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deab207","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,22]]}}}