{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T16:06:53Z","timestamp":1791389213569,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":112,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740096000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["82174517"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82174517"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>What is the best-performing model currently predicting live birth outcomes for IVF or ICSI?<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Among the identified prognostic models, McLernon\u2019s post-treatment model outperforms other models in both the meta-analysis and external validation of a Chinese cohort.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>With numerous similar models available across different time periods and using various predictors in IVF prognostic models, there is a need to summarize and evaluate them, due to a lack of validated evidence distinguishing high-quality from low-quality prediction tools. However, there is a notable dearth of research in the form of meta-analysis or external validation assessing the performance of models in predicting live births in this field.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The researchers conducted a comprehensive literature review in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, using keywords related to prognostic models and IVF\/ICSI live birth outcomes. The search included studies published up to 3 April 2024, and was limited to English language studies.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The review included studies that developed or validated prognostic models for IVF live birth outcomes while providing clear reports on model characteristics. Researchers extracted and analysed the data in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and other model-related guidelines. For model effects in meta-analysis, the choice would be based on the heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic and the Cochrane Q test. Model performance was evaluated by assessing their area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and calibration plots in the studies.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This review provides a comprehensive summary of data derived from 72 studies with an overall ROB of high or unclear. These studies contained a total of 132 predictors and 86 prognostic models, and then meta-analyses were performed for each of the five selected models. The total random effects of Templeton\u2019s, Nelson\u2019s, McLernon\u2019s pre-treatment and post-treatment model demonstrated AUCs of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61\u20130.69), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.63\u20130.64), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62\u20130.71), and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71\u20130.75), respectively. The total fixed effects of the intelligent data analysis score (iDAScore) model estimated an AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63\u20130.68). The external validation of the initial four models in our cohort produced AUCs ranging from 0.53 to 0.58, and the calibration was confirmed through calibration plots.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>While the focus on English-language studies and live birth outcomes may constrain the generalizability of the findings to diverse populations, this approach equips clinicians, who view live births as the ultimate objective, with more precise and actionable reference guidelines.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study represents the first meta-analysis in the field of IVF prediction models, definitively confirming the superior performance of McLernon\u2019s post-treatment model. The conclusion is reinforced by independent validation from another perspective. Nevertheless, further investigation is warranted to develop new models and to externally validate existing high-performing models for prognostic accuracy in IVF outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82174517). The authors report no conflict of interest.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>2022 CRD42022312018.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaf013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,22]],"date-time":"2025-02-22T00:01:41Z","timestamp":1740182501000},"page":"633-646","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Clinical prediction models for <i>in vitro<\/i> fertilization outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and external validation"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"C H","family":"Tian","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L Y","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y F","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H J","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y Y","family":"Lai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C L","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D","family":"Gan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Hospital , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6787-0938","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu,","place":["China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103408","article-title":"Correlations between a deep learning-based algorithm for embryo evaluation with cleavage-stage cell numbers and fragmentation","volume":"47","author":"Ahlstrom","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2016.03.008","article-title":"Conventional morphology performs better than morphokinetics for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer","volume":"33","author":"Ahlstrom","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650883","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.650883","article-title":"Predictive factors of conception and the cumulative pregnancy rate in subfertile couples undergoing timed intercourse with ultrasound","volume":"12","author":"Ahn","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.09.023","article-title":"Dehydroepiandrostendione sulphate and prediction of live birth after IVF in young women with low anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone concentration","volume":"28","author":"Alebi\u0107","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2971","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des283","article-title":"Simple adaptations to the Templeton model for IVF outcome prediction make it current and clinically useful","volume":"27","author":"Arvis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.063","article-title":"Ovarian reserve as a predictor of cumulative live birth","volume":"252","author":"Balachandren","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0145779","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0145779","article-title":"Design characteristics influence performance of clinical prediction rules in validation: a meta-epidemiological study","volume":"11","author":"Ban","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13570","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1002296107","article-title":"Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization","volume":"107","author":"Banerjee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci USA"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.09.011","article-title":"Predicting the likelihood of a live birth for women with endometriosis-related infertility","volume":"242","author":"Benoit","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa339","article-title":"Prioritizing IVF treatment in the post-COVID 19 era: a predictive modelling study based on UK national data","volume":"36","author":"Bhattacharya","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repbio.2018.10.006","article-title":"Predicting live birth by combining cleavage and blastocyst-stage time-lapse variables using a hierarchical and a data mining-based statistical model","volume":"18","author":"Bodri","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead242","article-title":"Pretreatment prediction for IVF outcomes: generalized applicable model or centre-specific model?","volume":"39","author":"Cai","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.4788","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of infertility: a review","volume":"326","author":"Carson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Jama"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.016","article-title":"Personalized prediction of first-cycle in vitro fertilization success","volume":"99","author":"Choi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1808","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa129","article-title":"Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis","volume":"35","author":"Chua","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1806","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12051806","article-title":"Towards automation in IVF: pre-clinical validation of a deep learning-based embryo grading system during PGT-A cycles","volume":"12","author":"Cimadomo","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmad010","article-title":"Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Cimadomo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e074819","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-074819","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation","volume":"384","author":"Collins","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g7594","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7594","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement","volume":"350","author":"Collins","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.01.033","article-title":"The details matter: personalized prediction of live birth after in vitro fertilization in women with polycystic ovary syndrome","volume":"121","author":"Cooney","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1774","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep109","article-title":"Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine","volume":"24","author":"Coppus","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2022.07.019","article-title":"How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies","volume":"29","author":"Damen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Microbiol Infect"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i6460","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i6460","article-title":"A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance","volume":"356","author":"Debray","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018","article-title":"A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models","volume":"68","author":"Debray","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e037289","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037289","article-title":"Predicting the chance on live birth per cycle at each step of the IVF journey: external validation and update of the van Loendersloot multivariable prognostic model","volume":"10","author":"Devroe","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev268","article-title":"Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: a novel pretreatment counselling tool","volume":"31","author":"Dhillon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1038\/s41422-022-00718-7","article-title":"Unraveling female reproductive senescence to enhance healthy longevity","volume":"33","author":"Dong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cell Res"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)09417-5","article-title":"Female subfertility","volume":"360","author":"Evers","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-023-01045-2","article-title":"Influencing factors and predictive model of live birth involving low-grade blastocyst frozen-thawed transfer: a retrospective study","volume":"28","author":"Fang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Med Res"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.10.005","article-title":"Evolution of embryo selection for IVF from subjective morphology assessment to objective time-lapse algorithms improves chance of live birth","volume":"40","author":"Fishel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.12.023","article-title":"GRADE Guidelines 28: use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks","volume":"121","author":"Foroutan","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e489","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(20)30186-2","article-title":"The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care","volume":"2","author":"Futoma","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-79308-9","article-title":"Early prediction of live birth for assisted reproductive technology patients: a convenient and practical prediction model","volume":"11","author":"Gao","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1007\/s40618-020-01209-5","article-title":"Overweight and high serum total cholesterol were risk factors for the outcome of IVF\/ICSI cycles in PCOS patients and a PCOS-specific predictive model of live birth rate was established","volume":"43","author":"Gao","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Endocrinol Invest"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027805","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2023.1027805","article-title":"Development and validation of a live birth prediction model for expected poor ovarian response patients during IVF\/ICSI","volume":"14","author":"Gong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20925","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-76928-z","article-title":"Machine learning predicts live-birth occurrence before in-vitro fertilization treatment","volume":"10","author":"Goyal","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017","article-title":"GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence\u2014inconsistency","volume":"64","author":"Guyatt","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.12.008","article-title":"Prognostic factors influencing fresh and frozen IVF outcomes: an analysis of the UK national database","volume":"22","author":"Hirst","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/0471722146","volume-title":"Applied Logistic Regression","author":"Hosmer","year":"2000","edition":"2nd edn"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04373-5","article-title":"Using deep learning to predict the outcome of live birth from more than 10,000 embryo data","volume":"22","author":"Huang","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h870","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h870","article-title":"Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients","volume":"350","author":"Iorio","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799871","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.799871","article-title":"A predictive model of live birth based on obesity and metabolic parameters in patients with PCOS undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer","volume":"12","author":"Jiang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B44","first-page":"3","article-title":"Prediction of individual probabilities of livebirth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counselling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics","volume":"8","author":"Jones","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Exp Clin Assist Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.4274\/tjod.galenos.2021.71770","article-title":"Factors associated with livebirth in couples undergoing their first in vitro fertilization cycle: an internally validated prediction model","volume":"18","author":"Kalafat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Turk J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-021-00767-4","article-title":"Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore\u2122 day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer","volume":"19","author":"Kato","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/1757-2215-6-3","article-title":"External validation of anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone based prediction of live birth in assisted conception","volume":"6","author":"Khader","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-3048402\/v1,","article-title":"How to estimate the probability of a live birth after one or more complete IVF cycles? The development of a novel model in a single-center","author":"Kong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Research Square"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101878","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101878","article-title":"The predicted probability of live birth in In Vitro Fertilization varies during important stages throughout the treatment: analysis of 114,882 first cycles","volume":"50","author":"La Marca","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.11.005","article-title":"Anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone-based prediction model for a live birth in assisted reproduction","volume":"22","author":"La Marca","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.03.010","article-title":"Levels of follicular G-CSF and interleukin-15 appear as noninvasive biomarkers of subsequent successful birth in modified natural in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles","volume":"95","author":"L\u00e9d\u00e9e","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-024-01185-y","article-title":"Associations between the artificial intelligence scoring system and live birth outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles","volume":"22","author":"Lee","year":"2024","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1600","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab050","article-title":"A large observational data study supporting the PROsPeR score classification in poor ovarian responders according to live birth outcome","volume":"36","author":"Lehert","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.03.013","article-title":"Predicting live birth for poor ovarian responders: the PROsPeR concept","volume":"37","author":"Lehert","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey263","article-title":"Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study","volume":"33","author":"Leijdekkers","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmp013","article-title":"Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal","volume":"15","author":"Leushuis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695157","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.695157","article-title":"The value of anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone in the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Lin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e83662","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.83662","article-title":"Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study","volume":"12","author":"Liu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Elife"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05775-3","article-title":"Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women","volume":"23","author":"Liu","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.4103\/jhrs.JHRS_ISAR_IFS","article-title":"Best practice recommendations for infertility management","volume":"17","author":"Malhotra","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102309","article-title":"Quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation: which covariates are really important to predict cumulative live birth and which models are best?","volume":"86","author":"McLernon","year":"2023","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.09.015","article-title":"Predicting personalized cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization","volume":"117","author":"McLernon","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i5735","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i5735","article-title":"Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113\u2009873 women","volume":"355","author":"McLernon","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05988-6","article-title":"A combined clinical and specific genes\u2019 model to predict live birth for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer patients","volume":"23","author":"Meng","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12284","article-title":"Feasibility of predicting live birth by combining conventional embryo evaluation with artificial intelligence applied to a blastocyst image in patients classified by age","volume":"18","author":"Miyagi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12267","article-title":"Feasibility of artificial intelligence for predicting live birth without aneuploidy from a blastocyst image","volume":"18","author":"Miyagi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.02.007","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"8","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001744","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001744","article-title":"Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist","volume":"11","author":"Moons","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W1","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1377","article-title":"PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration","volume":"170","author":"Moons","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.11.035","article-title":"The POPI-Plus tool: prediction model of outcome of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization from a large retrospective cohort","volume":"121","author":"Mourad","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.04.032","article-title":"Antim\u00fcllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth","volume":"104","author":"Nelson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000386","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000386","article-title":"Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles","volume":"8","author":"Nelson","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-024-01198-7","article-title":"Assessment of artificial intelligence model and manual morphokinetic annotation system as embryo grading methods for successful live birth prediction: a retrospective monocentric study","volume":"22","author":"Papamentzelopoulou","year":"2024","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.02.014","article-title":"Pre-stimulation parameters predicting live birth after IVF in the long GnRH agonist protocol","volume":"20","author":"Pettersson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-11-1","article-title":"Predicting live birth chances for women with multiple consecutive failing IVF cycles: a simple and accurate prediction for routine medical practice","volume":"11","author":"Porcu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1186\/s12967-019-2062-5","article-title":"Personalized prediction of live birth prior to the first in vitro fertilization treatment: a machine learning method","volume":"17","author":"Qiu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Transl Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900829","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2022.900829","article-title":"Nomogram for the cumulative live birth in women undergoing the first IVF cycle: base on 26, 689 patients in China","volume":"13","author":"Qu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1093\/ckj\/sfaa188","article-title":"External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?","volume":"14","author":"Ramspek","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Kidney J"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez258","article-title":"A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation","volume":"35","author":"Ratna","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead165","article-title":"External validation of models for predicting cumulative live birth over multiple complete cycles of IVF treatment","volume":"38","author":"Ratna","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2075","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac152","article-title":"Predicting cumulative live birth for couples beginning their second complete cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment","volume":"37","author":"Ratna","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i3140","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i3140","article-title":"External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges","volume":"353","author":"Riley","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-014-0348-3","article-title":"To what extent does anti-Mullerian hormone contribute to a better prediction of live birth after IVF?","volume":"32","author":"Rongieres","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b604","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b604","article-title":"Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model","volume":"338","author":"Royston","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V44N11p524","article-title":"Use of in vitro fertilisation prediction model in an Asian population-experience in Singapore","volume":"44","author":"Saha","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew069","article-title":"Predicting the success of IVF: external validation of the van Loendersloot\u2019s model","volume":"31","author":"Sarais","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.05.002","article-title":"Evaluation of artificial intelligence using time-lapse images of IVF embryos to predict live birth","volume":"43","author":"Sawada","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.03.003","article-title":"Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization","volume":"121","author":"Shingshetty","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1927","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13111927","article-title":"Nomogram for predicting live birth after the first fresh embryo transfer in patients with PCOS undergoing IVF\/ICSI treatment with the GnRH-ant protocol","volume":"13","author":"Si","year":"2023","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0121357","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0121357","article-title":"External validation and calibration of IVFpredict: a national prospective cohort study of 130,960 in vitro fertilisation cycles","volume":"10","author":"Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001381","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001381","article-title":"Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research","volume":"10","author":"Steyerberg","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1768","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der106","article-title":"Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles","volume":"26","author":"Sunkara","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01642-3","article-title":"A predictive model for women\u2019s assisted fecundity before starting the first IVF\/ICSI treatment cycle","volume":"37","author":"Tar\u00edn","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.03.030","article-title":"Predictors of live birth in women with a history of biochemical pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment","volume":"248","author":"Tar\u00edn","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1402","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)05291-9","article-title":"Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment","volume":"348","author":"Templeton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02562-5","article-title":"Correlation between an annotation-free embryo scoring system based on deep learning and live birth\/neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-centre, large-cohort retrospective study","volume":"39","author":"Ueno","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.12.005","article-title":"Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF\/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF\/ICSI single-embryo transfers","volume":"107","author":"Vaegter","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-023-02779-w","article-title":"There is no such thing as a validated prediction model","volume":"21","author":"Van Calster","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jare.2013.05.002","article-title":"Prediction models in in vitro fertilization; where are we? A mini review","volume":"5","author":"van Loendersloot","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Adv Res"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq015","article-title":"Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"van Loendersloot","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwq223","article-title":"External validity of risk models: use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients","volume":"172","author":"Vergouwe","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14649","article-title":"Prediction of live birth probability after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: a multi-center retrospective study in Chinese population","volume":"47","author":"Wen","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1376","article-title":"PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies","volume":"170","author":"Wolff","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101879","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arr.2023.101879","article-title":"Unveiling uterine aging: much more to learn","volume":"86","author":"Wu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ageing Res Rev"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"902083","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2022.902083","article-title":"A validated model for individualized prediction of live birth in patients with adenomyosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer","volume":"13","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B107","first-page":"116","article-title":"Development of a dynamic machine learning algorithm to predict clinical pregnancy and live birth rate with embryo morphokinetics","volume":"3","author":"Yang","year":"2022","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1302194","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2023.1302194","article-title":"Comparing Day 5 versus Day 6 euploid blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer and developing a predictive model for optimizing outcomes: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Yin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.4103\/2096-2924.262388","article-title":"Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the probability of live birth in infertile women","volume":"3","author":"Zhang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Dev Med"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1334599","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2024.1334599","article-title":"Establishment and validation of a nomogram for subsequent first-cycle live births in patients diagnosed with recurrent implantation failure: a population-based analysis","volume":"15","author":"Zhang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"838087","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2022.838087","article-title":"Live-birth prediction of natural-cycle in vitro fertilization using 57,558 linked cycle records: a machine learning perspective","volume":"13","author":"Zhang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2025040306380508200_deaf013-B112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606231","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.606231","article-title":"Predicting the likelihood of live birth in assisted reproductive technology according to the number of oocytes retrieved and female age using a generalized additive model: a retrospective cohort analysis of 17,948 cycles","volume":"12","author":"Zhu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/4\/633\/62048697\/deaf013.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/4\/633\/62048697\/deaf013.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,3]],"date-time":"2025-04-03T07:12:32Z","timestamp":1743664352000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/40\/4\/633\/8029831"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"references-count":112,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaf013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]}}}