{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T17:35:59Z","timestamp":1793900159635,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740096000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>How frequently do infertility trials report live birth and pregnancy, and how consistently were their definitions reported?<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>One-third of 1425 infertility trials published in the last decade reported live birth, with one in eight reporting clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth concurrently; absent, ambiguous, or heterogeneous definitions were common.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Absent or inconsistent outcome definitions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limit their interpretation and complicate subsequent evidence synthesis. While reporting live birth in infertility trials has been a long-running recommendation, the extent to which this is adhered to, and the temporal trend of adherence, is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown if outcome reporting in infertility trials is clear and consistent.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We studied all RCTs in infertility published between 2012 and 2023. We aimed to assess (i) whether biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth were reported; the temporal trends in reporting these pregnancy outcomes, and compare the characteristics of trials reporting each type of outcome; (ii) whether and how these pregnancy outcomes were defined.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We systematically searched Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL for RCTs in infertility from January 2012 to August 2023. RCTs involving infertile women that reported either biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, or live birth were eligible. Secondary analyses, interim analyses, or conference abstracts were not eligible. Two authors independently screened articles. We extracted pregnancy definitions and trial characteristics primarily using text mining in R, a programming environment for data analysis, and supplemented by manual checking. The accuracy of extracted data was validated in a random sample of 50 articles, with sensitivity and specificity all at or above 90%.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We included 1425 infertility RCTs. Among these, 419 (29.4%) reported biochemical pregnancy. While 1359 (95.4%) RCTs reported clinical pregnancy, 404 (28.4%) reported ongoing pregnancy, and 484 (34.0%) reported live birth, only 174 (12.2%) reported all three outcomes. The proportion of trials reporting live birth increased from 23.1% in 2012 to 33.7% in 2023. Trials reporting up to biochemical pregnancy or clinical pregnancy were more likely to be unregistered, smaller, single-centered, and published in non-first quarter journals. Definitions for biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth were provided in 68.5% (287\/419), 64.5% (876\/1359), 70.5% (285\/404), and 41.1% (199\/484) of articles reporting on these outcomes. Among 876 clinical pregnancy definitions, 63.4% (n\u2009=\u2009555) specified the pregnancy confirmation timing. Of the 220 definitions that reported gestational weeks (ranging from 4 to 16\u2009weeks), the most common cut-off was 6\u2009weeks, used in 48.2% (n\u2009=\u2009106) of cases. For ongoing pregnancy definitions, 96.1% (n\u2009=\u2009274) of the 285 definitions included gestational age in weeks (ranging from 6 to 32\u2009weeks), with 12\u2009weeks being the most common cut-off used in 49.1% (n\u2009=\u2009140) of definitions. Among 199 live birth definitions, 62.3% (n\u2009=\u2009124) used a gestational age threshold (ranging from 20 to 37\u2009weeks), with 24\u2009weeks being the most common cut-off, used in 28.6% (n\u2009=\u200957) of trials.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Due to the vast data we needed to extract, we used text-mining supplemented by manual data extraction. While we optimized the text-mining algorithm attempting to identify all types of outcome definitions and manually curated all extracted definitions, definitions were missed in less than 10% of randomly checked studies, which is a limitation of this study. We only described definition patterns in published RCTs, and our results cannot be extrapolated to unpublished RCTs.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Despite long-standing recommendations to report live birth in infertility trials, in the last decade only a third of RCTs did so. This highlights a disconnection between the advocated outcome and what researchers are reporting. We observed an encouraging trend that there has been a consistent rise in the proportion of trials reporting live birth. Furthermore, the significant lack and variability of pregnancy definitions underscore the imperative to increase the dissemination and uptake of standardized pregnancy outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>No funding was received for the study. Q.F. reports receiving a PhD scholarship from Merck. B.W.M. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). B.W.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck and consultancy for Organon and Norgine. B.W.M. holds stock from ObsEva. W.T.L. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator grant (GTN2016729). W.L.L. reports receiving a PhD scholarship from the China Scholarship Council. T.D.H and S.L. are employees of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Investigator grant (GTN2009767). The other author has no conflict of interest to declare.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>CRD42024498624.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaf022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,22]],"date-time":"2025-02-22T00:01:36Z","timestamp":1740182496000},"page":"654-663","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["The presence, clarity, and consistency of definitions in pregnancy outcomes in infertility trials: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3321-6660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Qian","family":"Feng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8980-0909","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wentao","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU), Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wanlin","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6622-8134","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rui","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Crispin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Salvatore","family":"Longobardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Global Clinical Development Fertility, Research and Development , Merck, Darmstadt,","place":["Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2373-8257","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas","family":"D\u2019Hooghe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Research Group Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven) , Leuven,","place":["Belgium"]},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT,","place":["USA"]},{"name":"Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA , Darmstadt,","place":["Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben W","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria,","place":["Australia"]},{"name":"Aberdeen Centre for Women\u2019s Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen,","place":["UK"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.026","article-title":"Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple","volume":"101","author":"Barnhart","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60329-9","article-title":"Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence","volume":"374","author":"Chalmers","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011","article-title":"Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research","volume":"63","author":"Chavalarias","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.1952","article-title":"Evolution of reporting P values in the biomedical literature, 1990\u20132015","volume":"315","author":"Chavalarias","year":"2016","journal-title":"Jama"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B5","author":"Clarivate\u2019s","year":"2023"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B6","author":"Dimensions","year":"2024"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2725","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa241","article-title":"Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study","volume":"35","author":"Duffy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2735","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa243","article-title":"Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study","volume":"35","author":"Duffy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.013","article-title":"Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study","volume":"115","author":"Duffy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B10","first-page":"2286219","article-title":"Semi-automatic staging area for high-quality structured data extraction from scientific literature","volume":"3","author":"Foppiano","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci Technol Adv Mater Methods"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1111\/2041-210X.12472","article-title":"Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R","volume":"7","author":"Lajeunesse","year":"2016","journal-title":"Methods Ecol Evol"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg081","article-title":"Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting","volume":"18","author":"Land","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2075","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu218","article-title":"Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement","volume":"29","author":"Legro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B14","first-page":"473","author":"Lopez","year":"2009"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B15","author":"Newman","year":"2023"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.11.009","article-title":"Interpretation of clinical trial results: a committee opinion","volume":"113","author":"Practice Committee of the ASRM","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B17","volume-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing","author":"R Core Team","year":"2013"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoac010","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac010","article-title":"Outcome reporting across randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male infertility: a systematic review","volume":"2022","author":"Rimmer","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2000797","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.2000797","article-title":"Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature","volume":"15","author":"Szucs","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Biol"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B20","first-page":"99","author":"Tkaczyk","year":"2018"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102306","article-title":"Live birth is not the only relevant outcome in research assessing assisted reproductive technology","volume":"86","author":"Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2714","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew227","article-title":"No common denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs","volume":"31","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B23","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2023"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B24","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2024"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1093\/infdis\/jiad130","article-title":"Transparency in infectious disease research: meta-research survey of specialty journals","volume":"228","author":"Zavalis","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Infect Dis"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009","article-title":"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009","volume":"92","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005","article-title":"The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017","volume":"108","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025040306371616900_deaf022-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1786","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex234","article-title":"The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017","volume":"32","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/4\/654\/62048687\/deaf022.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/4\/654\/62048687\/deaf022.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,3]],"date-time":"2025-04-03T06:50:37Z","timestamp":1743663037000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/40\/4\/654\/8029830"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaf022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]}}}