{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T06:25:43Z","timestamp":1788330343882,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]],"date-time":"2025-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1741564800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"funder":[{"name":"Agency for Innovation through Science","award":["IWT SB-141441"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["IWT SB-141441"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Is there evidence of a plateau in the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) after a certain number of consecutive transfers of untested embryos?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In our cohort of 11\u00a0463 women, the cLBR continues to increase with each additional transfer of an untested embryo, reaching 68.3% after six blastocyst transfers and 78.0% after 10 blastocyst transfers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While cumulative success rates in ART are rising, implantation failure remains a persistent challenge. The actual frequency of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and whether RIF surpasses the inherent implantation potential of transferred embryos remains a matter of debate. A recent study reported a cLBR of 98% after five euploid blastocyst transfers, suggesting that most implantation failures are likely embryonic rather than endometrial. However, it remains unclear how these findings can be extrapolated to patients who did not undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). While theoretical models estimate cumulative implantation probabilities based on published blastocyst euploidy rates by female age, real-world data on cumulative success in routine clinical practice remain limited.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This non-interventional retrospective cohort study included records of all completed IVF\/ICSI cycles (including thus fresh and frozen\u2013thawed transfers of one oocyte retrieval cycle) in women who underwent IVF\/ICSI at the Ghent University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2022. After excluding treatments involving PGT, oocyte donation and surrogacy, or a mix of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage transfers, our dataset consisted of 11\u00a0463 women who underwent a total of 19\u00a0378 IVF\/ICSI cycles, resulting in a total of 31\u00a0478 embryo transfers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The number of embryos transferred (\u2018time\u2019) until achieving live birth (\u2018event\u2019) was analysed using a Kaplan\u2013Meier approach with inverse probability weighting (IPW). Additionally, logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of the number of previously transferred embryos on the live birth rates (LBRs) of the second and subsequent transfers, adjusting for female age, quality of previously transferred embryos, and stage of embryos transferred (cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Kaplan\u2013Meier estimates using an IPW approach showed cLBRs increasing from 51.1% (95% CI: 49.2\u201353.0%) after a third, up to 68.3% (95% CI: 64.6\u201372.0%) after a sixth and even as high as 78.0% (95% CI: 69.5\u201386.5%) after a tenth blastocyst transfer, respectively. As maternal age increases, higher numbers of blastocysts are required to achieve the same cLBR. Moreover, no age category achieves an 80% cLBR until after the transfer of eight blastocysts. Maternal age has a considerable effect, as illustrated by cLBR after the fourth blastocyst transfer of 68.9% (95% CI: 65.8\u201371.8%) for &amp;lt;35\u2009years; 57.6% (95% CI: 50.4\u201364.8%) for 35\u201337\u2009years; 42.9% (95% CI: 37.5\u201348.4%) for 38\u201340\u2009years; 16.3% (95% CI: 10.7\u201321.8%) for 41\u201342\u2009years; and 13.5% (95% CI: 3.2\u201323.7%) for &amp;gt;42\u2009years, respectively. In the adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds for achieving live birth are estimated to decrease for each additional embryo transferred; however, this effect is not statistically significant (OR\u2009=\u20090.91; 95% CI: 0.86\u20131.07). Female age, as expected, was a significant predictor of implantation rate with subsequent transfers (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.91\u20130.93). Additionally, being assigned to a blastocyst transfer strategy rather than to a cleavage stage transfer strategy was also a significant predictor (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.20\u20131.51), as was proportion of embryos classified as excellent or good quality based on predefined morphological criteria out of the total number of embryos previously transferred (OR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.06\u20141.38). Implantation rate is also correlated with the response to stimulation (P\u2009=\u20090.016) and the blastocyst formation rate (P\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.0001). There was no significant difference in LBR after an equal number of previously unsuccessful blastocyst transfers, depending on how many oocyte collection cycles it took to reach that number of blastocysts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results are limited by the observational retrospective design, and while regression analyses were adjusted for potential confounding factors, residual confounding may persist, particularly given the considerable heterogeneity in treatments. We did not exclude patients with factors associated with less favourable reproductive outcomes because our goal was to evaluate actual clinical practice.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our data emphasize the potential for successful live birth even after multiple unsuccessful transfers. Factors such as age, embryo quality, response to ovarian stimulation, and rate of blastocyst formation influence outcomes. By addressing these multifaceted influences, our research provides valuable insights and a hopeful outlook for patients undergoing fertility treatment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>L.D. received a grant from the Agency for Innovation through Science (IWT SB-141441). The funder did not have any role in the study design; data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; nor the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaf036","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,25]],"date-time":"2025-02-25T08:51:05Z","timestamp":1740473465000},"page":"818-833","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Cumulative live birth rates of 31\u00a0478 untested embryos from 11\u00a0463 women challenge traditional recurrent implantation failure definitions"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8639-4877","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"L","family":"Dhaenens","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]},{"name":"Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7855-5549","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"R","family":"Colman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1961-231X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"I","family":"De Croo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4070-1587","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"H","family":"Verstraelen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8792-3814","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P","family":"De Sutter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7831-1085","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"D","family":"Stoop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]},{"name":"Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent,","place":["Belgium"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.08.013","article-title":"Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antim\u00fcllerian hormone\u2013stratified, dose\u2013response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection","volume":"102","author":"Arce","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.06.045","article-title":"A new definition of recurrent implantation failure on the basis of anticipated blastocyst aneuploidy rates across female age","volume":"116","author":"Ata","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.02.009","article-title":"Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated","volume":"24","author":"Ata","year":"2012","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu272","article-title":"Can you ever collect too many oocytes?","volume":"30","author":"Briggs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"929","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab014","article-title":"Leave the past behind: women\u2019s reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts\u2019 euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers","volume":"36","author":"Cimadomo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2003.10.004","article-title":"Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights","volume":"75","author":"Cole","year":"2004","journal-title":"Comput Methods Programs Biomed"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoaa034","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa034","article-title":"A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic","volume":"2020","author":"De Croo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reproduction Open"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2321","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead197","article-title":"ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE","volume":"38","author":"European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad023","article-title":"ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure","volume":"2023","author":"ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.01.001","article-title":"A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates","volume":"119","author":"Fanton","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004","article-title":"The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening","volume":"101","author":"Franasiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B12","first-page":"378","volume-title":"Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond 1999\u2014The Plenary Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics","author":"Gardner","year":"1999"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae040","article-title":"Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients","volume":"39","author":"Gill","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab278","article-title":"Talking about possible IVF\/ICSI failure and need for multiple cycles in treatment planning: qualitative investigation of multi-cycle planning and its acceptability to patients and staff","volume":"37","author":"Harrison","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B9376394","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43","article-title":"A structural approach to selection bias","volume":"15","author":"Hern\u00e1n","year":"2004","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2044","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez120","article-title":"What is the prognosis for a live birth after unexplained recurrent implantation failure following IVF\/ICSI?","volume":"34","author":"Koot","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1778","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez100","article-title":"The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles","volume":"34","author":"Law","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B17","first-page":"2295","article-title":"IVF success corrected for drop-out: use of inverse probability weighting","volume":"33","author":"Modest","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.3390\/life12010039","article-title":"Recurrent implantation failure\u2014is it the egg or the chicken?","volume":"12","author":"Pirtea","year":"2021","journal-title":"Life"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002","article-title":"Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers","volume":"115","author":"Pirtea","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including \u223c15,000 women","volume":"110","author":"Polyzos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev149","article-title":"Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?","volume":"30","author":"Polyzos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B22","first-page":"348","article-title":"Association of ovarian stimulation and embryonic aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization cycles with preimplantation genetic testing: a narrative systematic review","volume":"26","author":"Rodriguez-Purata","year":"2022","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2297","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01581-z","article-title":"Correction to: Contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Registry","volume":"36","author":"Scaravelli","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.09.012","article-title":"Repeated implantation failure at the crossroad between statistics, clinics and over-diagnosis","volume":"36","author":"Somigliana","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1768","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der106","article-title":"Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles","volume":"26","author":"Sunkara","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61737-3","article-title":"Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates","volume":"7","author":"van der Gaast","year":"2003","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2025050201522462100_deaf036-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.10.037","article-title":"How many oocytes are optimal to achieve multiple live births with one stimulation cycle? The one-and-done approach","volume":"107","author":"Vaughan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/5\/818\/62369877\/deaf036.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/5\/818\/62369877\/deaf036.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,2]],"date-time":"2025-05-02T01:52:53Z","timestamp":1746150773000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/40\/5\/818\/8068968"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaf036","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]]}}}