{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,4]],"date-time":"2025-11-04T17:27:15Z","timestamp":1762277235034,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]],"date-time":"2025-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756771200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000071","name":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01HD102207","K01HD107172","P2CHD047873","P2CHD042854"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01HD102207","K01HD107172","P2CHD047873","P2CHD042854"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000071","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY QUESTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Are the assumptions required by the current duration (CD) approach to estimating population infertility met, and does the CD approach produce similar infertility estimates to those from the \u2018gold standard\u2019 incident prospective cohort approach within the same sample using fertility app data?<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>SUMMARY ANSWER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While we find evidence of CD assumption violation, once addressed, the CD approach produces comparable infertility prevalence estimates and patterns to those from an incident prospective cohort design when selecting from the same sample of women.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The CD approach to documenting population and subgroup infertility is a promising, more feasible, and cost-effective alternative method to the incident prospective cohort design. However, as a field, we do not have sufficient evidence to use the CD approach for the study of population infertility because method assumptions have not been rigorously tested using population-based samples.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We use prospective cohort data provided by users of smartphone applications in which they record fertility and pregnancy information. The total prospective cohort sample included 167\u00a0451 people using the applications between 1 January 2015 and 28 February 2022. To generate valid comparisons, we drew six CD samples from the same data source. The samples contained between 17\u00a0196 and 26\u00a0259 people measured in designated months.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PARTICIPANTS\/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participants are users of a fertility and pregnancy smartphone application aged 18\u201344\u00a0years who were trying to become pregnant and began using the smartphone application during the study period. We first tested the three assumptions required by the CD approach. We then estimated 12-month infertility prevalence separately using prospective and CD approaches, first for all users, and then for subpopulations stratified by age, education, parity, and level of poverty. We assessed whether estimates of population infertility using prospective and CD approaches were statistically different, overall and for each subpopulation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We demonstrate clear violation of one CD assumption, and suggestive evidence of one other assumption violation. The prospective survival function resulted in a 12-month infertility prevalence of 36.1% (95% CI 35.8\u201336.3) while the CD estimate adjusted for assumption violation was 37.0% (95% CI 36.2\u201337.7). Infertility patterns by user characteristics were similar for prospective and CD estimates, with greater levels of infertility for those 35\u2009years old or greater, those with no children, those with less education, and those residing in areas with greater levels of poverty.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Potential sample selection and censoring do not affect the internal validity of within-sample comparison tests, which answer the study\u2019s primary research questions. However, selection and censoring may contribute to sample non-representativeness and the higher than expected levels of infertility relative to the US population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Researchers can potentially learn about patterns of infertility with cross-sectional data alone, provided they statistically address CD assumption violations. This finding facilitates the study of infertility in populations, subpopulations, places, and periods for which infertility estimates do not exist. Although we weighted the samples to reflect the US population sociodemographic characteristics, users of this app may underreport pregnancy and\/or may be subfertile, thus, the infertility prevalence estimates reported here should not be interpreted as population-level estimates for the USA.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>STUDY FUNDING\/COMPETING INTEREST(S)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD102207, K01HD107172, P2CHD047873, P2CHD042854). The funders were not involved in the study design, analyses, manuscript writing, or decision to publish. S.M. is an employee of Ovia Health by Labcorp, and owns stock in Labcorp Holdings. Ovia Health created the fertility app from which the data for the analysis were sourced. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>N\/A.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaf168","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,14]],"date-time":"2025-08-14T11:59:59Z","timestamp":1755172799000},"page":"2172-2180","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Validating the current duration approach for measuring infertility prevalence using novel app data from the USA"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7650-5940","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Suzanne O","family":"Bell","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD,","place":["USA"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-7241-4667","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sungsik","family":"Hwang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI,","place":["USA"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shannon","family":"Malloy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ovia Health , Boston, MA,","place":["USA"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5175-4265","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jenna","family":"Nobles","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI,","place":["USA"]},{"name":"Department of Demography, University of California , Berkeley, CA,","place":["USA"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1722","DOI":"10.1111\/andr.13614","article-title":"The association of socioeconomic status with semen parameters in a cohort of men in the United States","volume":"12","author":"Badreddine","year":"2024","journal-title":"Andrology"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2478","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg444","article-title":"Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort","volume":"18","author":"Basso","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"856","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/29.5.856","article-title":"Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias","volume":"29","author":"Basso","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1097\/00001648-199509000-00010","article-title":"Infertility TESGo, subfecundity. Are seasonal preferences in pregnancy planning a source of bias in studies of seasonal variation in reproductive outcomes?","volume":"6","author":"Basso","year":"1995","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"volume-title":"About the National Survey of Family Growth","year":"2024","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B5"},{"volume-title":"Infertility and Impaired Fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth","year":"2013","author":"Chandra","key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B6"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003","article-title":"Psychological impact of infertility","volume":"21","author":"Cousineau","year":"2007","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoac051","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac051","article-title":"Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2022","author":"Cox","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.2307\/1912517","article-title":"Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root","volume":"49","author":"Dickey","year":"1981","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13584","article-title":"Obstetric consequences of subfertility: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"123","author":"DoPierala","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000000916","article-title":"A systematic comparison of designs to study human fecundity","volume":"30","author":"Eijkemans","year":"2019","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1538","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2021.0026","article-title":"Time to pregnancy for women using a fertility awareness based mobile application to plan a pregnancy","volume":"30","author":"Favaro","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2192387","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/2192387","article-title":"Smartphone applications for period tracking: rating and behavioral change among women users","volume":"2020","author":"Karasneh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9469.2012.00798.x","article-title":"The current duration approach to estimating time to pregnancy","volume":"39","author":"Keiding","year":"2012","journal-title":"Scand J Stat"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/3.4.565","article-title":"Estimating time to pregnancy from current durations in a cross-sectional sample","volume":"3","author":"Keiding","year":"2002","journal-title":"Biostatistics"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2238940","DOI":"10.1080\/26410397.2023.2238940","article-title":"Missed period? The significance of period-tracking applications in a post-Roe America","volume":"31","author":"Kelly","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"846","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.11.033","article-title":"Research on infertility: which definition should we use?","volume":"83","author":"Larsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-020-0269-8","article-title":"Characterizing physiological and symptomatic variation in menstrual cycles using self-tracked mobile-health data","volume":"3","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chemosphere.2012.01.017","article-title":"Heavy metals and couple fecundity, the LIFE Study","volume":"87","author":"Louis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Chemosphere"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115332","article-title":"Research on infertility: definition makes a difference","volume":"130","author":"Marchbanks","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des347","article-title":"Infertility and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Messerlian","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B22","first-page":"20552076221102248","article-title":"Who needs an app? Fertility patients\u2019 use of a novel mobile health app","volume":"8","author":"Miner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Digit Health"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2113762118","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2113762118","article-title":"Menstrual irregularity as a biological limit to early pregnancy awareness","volume":"119","author":"Nobles","year":"2022","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci USA"},{"volume-title":"Mobile Fact Sheet","year":"2024","author":"Pew Research Center","key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B24"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1064","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex025","article-title":"Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to Demographic and Health Survey data","volume":"32","author":"Polis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.10.058","article-title":"Prolonged time to pregnancy is associated with a greater risk of adverse outcomes","volume":"94","author":"Raatikainen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1191\/0962280206sm435oa","article-title":"Design and analysis of time-to-pregnancy","volume":"15","author":"Scheike","year":"2006","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1080\/15325020802537468","article-title":"Trauma of pregnancy loss and infertility among mothers and involuntarily childless women in the United States","volume":"14","author":"Schwerdtfeger","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Loss Trauma"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ede.0000221781.15114.88","article-title":"Feasibility of the current-duration approach to studying human fecundity","volume":"17","author":"Slama","year":"2006","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des070","article-title":"Estimation of the frequency of involuntary infertility on a nation-wide basis","volume":"27","author":"Slama","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.05.018","article-title":"Estimates of infertility in the United States: 1995\u20132019","volume":"118","author":"Snow","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"volume-title":"Stata Statistical Software: Release 18","year":"2022","author":"StataCorp","key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B32"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00143993","article-title":"Seasonal variation in the time to pregnancy: a secondary analysis of three Danish databases","volume":"12","author":"Stolwijk","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037","article-title":"Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach","volume":"99","author":"Thoma","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwj234","article-title":"ZIP-code-based versus tract-based income measures as long-term risk-adjusted mortality predictors","volume":"164","author":"Thomas","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B36","first-page":"385","article-title":"Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception","volume":"13","author":"Tietze","year":"1968","journal-title":"Int J Fertil"},{"volume-title":"American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates","year":"2019","author":"United States Census Bureau, American Community Survey","key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B37"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.2307\/2531205","article-title":"The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies","volume":"42","author":"Weinberg","year":"1986","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.09.002","article-title":"Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study","volume":"217","author":"Wesselink","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez265","article-title":"Seasonal patterns in fecundability in North America and Denmark: a preconception cohort study","volume":"35","author":"Wesselink","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.01.024","article-title":"Prospective study of time to pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes","volume":"103","author":"Wise","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00128.x","article-title":"Accelerated failure\u2013time mover\u2013stayer regression models for the analysis of last\u2013episode data","volume":"33","author":"Yamaguchi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Sociol Methodol"},{"key":"2025110412222137400_deaf168-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)58144-8","article-title":"Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss","volume":"65","author":"Zinaman","year":"1996","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/11\/2172\/64196165\/deaf168.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/40\/11\/2172\/64196165\/deaf168.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,4]],"date-time":"2025-11-04T17:22:32Z","timestamp":1762276952000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/40\/11\/2172\/8246298"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaf168","relation":{},"ISSN":["0268-1161","1460-2350"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0268-1161"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1460-2350"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]]}}}