{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T13:45:47Z","timestamp":1773236747280,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,1]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh827","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,3]],"date-time":"2005-03-03T20:24:44Z","timestamp":1109881484000},"page":"1573-1577","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Ovarian response to standard gonadotrophin stimulation for IVF is decreased not only in older but also in younger women in couples with idiopathic and male subfertility"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"A.J.","family":"Goverde","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"McDonnell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Schats","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.P.W.","family":"Vermeiden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Homburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.B.","family":"Lambalk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Akande VA, Fleming CF, Hunt LP, Keay SD and Jenkins JM (2002) Biological versus chronological ageing of oocytes, distinguishable by raised FSH levels in relation to the success of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod17, 2003\u20132008.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.8.2003"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bancsi LFJMM, Broekmans FJM, Eijkemans MJC, de Jong FH, Habbema JDF and te Velde ER (2002) Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril77, 328\u2013336.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)02983-1"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beckers NGM, Macklon NS, Eijkemans MJC and Fauser BCJM (2002) Women with regular menstrual cycles and a poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization exhibit follicular phase characteristics suggestive of ovarian aging. Fertil Steril78, 291\u2013297.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(02)03227-2"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Boer EJ, den Tonkelaar I, te Velde ER, Burger CW and van Leeuwen FE on behalf of the OMEGA-project group (2003) Increased risk of early menopausal transition and natural menopause after poor response at first IVF treatment. Hum Reprod18, 1544\u20131552.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg278"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Commenges-Ducos M, Tricaud S, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Dallay D, Horovitz J and Commenges D (1998) Modelling of the probability of success of the stages of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: stimulation, fertilization and implantation. Hum Reprod13, 78\u201383.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.1.78"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faddy MJ and Gosden RJ (1995) A mathematical model of follicle dynamics in the human ovary. Hum Reprod10, 770\u2013775.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136036"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ and Nelson JF (1992) Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in midlife: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod7, 1342\u20131346.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137570"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farhi J, Homburg R, Ferber A, Orvieto R and Ben Rafael Z (1997) Non-response to ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic, normogonadal women: a clinical sign of impending onset of ovarian failure pre-empting the rise in basal follicle stimulating hormone levels. Hum Reprod12, 241\u2013243.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.2.241"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JPW, Schats R, Rutten FFH and Schoemaker J (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet335, 13\u201318.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)04002-7"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kailasam C, Keay SD, Wislon P, Ford WCL and Jenkins JM (2004) Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome. Hum Reprod19, 1544\u20131547.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh273"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karlsson MO, Wade JR, Loumaye E and Munafo A (1998) The population pharmocokinetics of recombinant- and urinary-human follicle stimulating hormone in women. Br J Clin Pharmacol45, 13\u201320.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2125.1998.00644.x"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez-Bernal A and Barlow D (1999) Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertilization worthwhile? Hum Reprod14, 964\u2013969.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.4.964"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nikolaou D and Templeton A (2003) Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis. Detection and clinical relevance. Hum Reprod18, 1137\u20131139.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg245"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R14","unstructured":"Perez Mayorga M, Gromoll J, Behre HM, Gassner C, Nieschlag E and Simoni M (2000) Ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation depends on the FSH receptor genotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab85, 3365\u20133369."},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Lindhard A, Bangsb\u00f8ll S, Andersson AM and Nyboe Andersen A (2003) A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in \u2018standard\u2019 IVF\/ICSI patients treated recombinant FSH. A suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogram. Hum Reprod18, 781\u2013787.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg181"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roseboom TJ, Vermeiden JPW, Schoute E, Lens JW and Schats R (1995) The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum Reprod10, 3035\u20133041.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135842"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"te Velde ER and Pearson PL (2002) The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update8, 141\u2013154.","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/8.2.141"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"te Velde ER, Dorland M and Broekmans FJM (1998) Age at menopause as a marker of reproductive ageing. Maturitas30, 119\u2013125.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-5122(98)00067-X"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171010144027_R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Zonneveld P, Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJM and te Velde ER (2001) Hormones and reproductive ageing. Maturitas38, 83\u201394.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-5122(00)00194-8"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/20\/6\/1573\/2244871\/deh827.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T01:31:54Z","timestamp":1548984714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/20\/6\/1573\/748834\/Ovarian-response-to-standard-gonadotrophin"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,3]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,3]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deh827","relation":{},"ISSN":["1460-2350","0268-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,3]]}}}