{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T16:32:09Z","timestamp":1791045129930,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,1]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei424","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,1,21]],"date-time":"2006-01-21T01:33:24Z","timestamp":1137807204000},"page":"1041-1046","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":66,"title":["The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"D.","family":"De Neubourg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Gerris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Mangelschots","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Van Royen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Vercruyssen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Steylemans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Elseviers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_ALEXANDER-ET-AL-1996","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alexander GR , Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mors J and Kogan M (1996) A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol87,163\u2013167.","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_BERGH-ET-AL-1999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bergh T , Ericson A, Hillensj\u00f6 T, Nygren KG and Wennerholm UB (1999) Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982\u201395: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet354,1579\u20131586.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)04345-7"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_DAVIES-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davies MJ , Wang JX and Norman RJ (2004) What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Assessing the BESST index for reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod19,1049\u20131051.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh202"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_DE-NEUBOURG-AND-GERRIS-2003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Neubourg D and Gerris J (2003) Single embryo transfer \u2013 state of the art. Reprod Biomed Online7,615\u2013622.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)62083-4"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_DE-NEUBOURG-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Neubourg D , Gerris J, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M and Elseviers M (2004) Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod19,1476\u20131479.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh283"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_DICKEY-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dickey R , Sartor B and Pyrzak R (2004) What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Hum Reprod19,783\u2013787.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh181"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_DRAPER-ET-AL-1999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Draper ES , Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR and Clarke M (1999) Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet353,1746\u20131749.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)08500-6"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_EVERS-2002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evers J (2002) Female subfertility. Lancet360,151\u2013159.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)09417-5"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_GERRIS-ET-AL-1999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerris J , De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M and Valkenburg M (1999) Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod14,2581\u20132587.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.10.2581"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_GERRIS-ET-AL-2002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerris J , De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Barudy-Vasquez J, Valkenburg M and Ryckaert G (2002) Elective single day-3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF\/ICSI programme. Hum Reprod17,2621\u20132626.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.10.2626"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_GERRIS-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerris J , de Sutter P, de Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Vander Elst J, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, Kok P. Elseviers M, Annemans L et al. (2004) A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF\/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 19, 917\u2013923.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh188"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_HEALY-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Healy D (2004) Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome. Fertil Steril81,512\u2013513.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.08.038"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_HELMERHORST-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helmerhorst FM , Perquin DAM, Donker D and Keirse MJNC (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ328,261\u2013264.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37957.560278.EE"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_JACKSON-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jackson RA , Gibson KA, Wu YW and Croughan MS (2004) Perinatal outcome in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol103,551\u2013563.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_LAMBALK-AND-VAN-2001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lambalk C and van Hooff M (2001) Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries. Fertil Steril75,731\u2013736.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01679-X"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_MIN-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Min JK , Breheny SA, MacLachlan V and Healy DL (2004) What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod19,3\u20137.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh028"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_OCHSENKUHN-ET-AL-2003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ochsenkuhn R , Strowitzki T, Gurtner M, Strauss A, Schulze A, Hepp H and Hillemanns P (2003) Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF. Arch Gynecol Obstet268,256\u2013261.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-003-0518-5"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_PANDIAN-ET-AL-2001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pandian Z , Bhattacharya S and Templeton A (2001) Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review. Hum Reprod16,2593\u20132597.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.12.2593"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_SCHIEVE-ET-AL-2002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schieve LA , Meikle S, Ferre C, Herbert B, Peterson HB, Jeng G and Wilcox L (2002) Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med346,731\u2013737.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa010806"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_SCHIEVE-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schieve LA , Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA and Wright VC (2004) Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol103,1144\u20131153.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000127037.12652.76"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_TEMPLETON-AND-MORRIS-1998","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Templeton A and Morris Jk (1998) Reducing the risks of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med339,573\u2013577.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199808273390901"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_THURIN-ET-AL-2004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thurin A , Hausken J, Hillensj\u00f6 T, Jablanowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A and Bergh C (2004) Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med351,2392\u20133402.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_VAN-ROYEN-ET-AL-1999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Royen E , Mangelschots K, De Neubourg Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, Eestermans W and Gerris J (1999) Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod14,2345\u20132349.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.9.2345"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_VAN-ROYEN-ET-AL-2001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Royen E , Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Laureys I, Ryckaert G and Gerris J (2001) Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. Hum Reprod16,326\u2013332.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.2.326"},{"key":"key\n\t\t\t\t20171012073612_VILSKA-ET-AL-1999","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vilska S , Tiitinen A, Hyd\u00e9n-Granskog C and Hovatta O (1999) Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod14,2392\u20132395.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.9.2392"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article-pdf\/21\/4\/1041\/1574025\/dei424.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,15]],"date-time":"2019-04-15T21:17:46Z","timestamp":1555363066000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humrep\/article\/21\/4\/1041\/585552\/The-obstetrical-and-neonatal-outcome-of-babies"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,1,20]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,1,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dei424","relation":{},"ISSN":["1460-2350","0268-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1460-2350","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0268-1161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,1,20]]}}}