{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T05:35:41Z","timestamp":1783488941607,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,16]],"date-time":"2021-02-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1613433600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"funder":[{"name":"Rigshospitalet\u2019s research fund"},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003358","name":"Gedeon Richter","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Forward2018_5"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Forward2018_5"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003358","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>BACKGROUND<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In Europe, the number of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles is steadily increasing, now accounting for more than 190\u00a0000 cycles per year. It is standard clinical practice to postpone FET for at least one menstrual cycle following a failed fresh transfer or after a freeze-all cycle. The purpose of this practice is to minimise the possible residual negative effect of ovarian stimulation on the resumption of a normal ovulatory cycle and receptivity of the endometrium. Although elective deferral of FET may unnecessarily delay time to pregnancy, immediate FET may be inefficient in a clinical setting, following an increased risk of irregular ovulatory cycles and the presence of functional cysts, increasing the risk of cycle cancellation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This review explores the impact of timing of FET in the first cycle (immediate FET) versus the second or subsequent cycle (postponed FET) following a failed fresh transfer or a freeze-all cycle on live birth rate (LBR). Secondary endpoints were implantation, pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) as well as miscarriage rate (MR).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>SEARCH METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases for MeSH and Emtree terms, as well as text words related to timing of FET, up to March 2020, in English language. There were no limitations regarding year of publication or duration of follow-up. Inclusion criteria were subfertile women aged 18-46\u2009years with any indication for treatment with IVF\/ICSI. Studies on oocyte donation were excluded. All original studies were included, except for case reports, study protocols and abstracts only. Covidence, a Cochrane-tool, was used for sorting and screening of literature. Risk of bias was assessed using the Robins-I tool and the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>OUTCOMES<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Out of 4124 search results, 15 studies were included in the review. Studies reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for LBR, CPR and MR were included in meta-analyses. All studies (n\u2009=\u200915) were retrospective cohort studies involving a total of 6,304 immediate FET cycles and 13,851 postponed FET cycles including 8,019 matched controls. Twelve studies of very low to moderate quality reported no difference in LBR with immediate versus postponed FET. Two studies of moderate quality reported a statistically significant increase in LBR with immediate FET and one small study of very low quality reported better LBR with postponed FET. Trends in rates of secondary outcomes followed trends in LBR regarding timing of FET. The meta-analyses showed a significant advantage of immediate FET (n\u2009=2,076) compared to postponed FET (n\u2009=3,833), with a pooled aOR of 1.20 (95% CI 1.01\u20131.44) for LBR and a pooled aOR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.07\u20131.39) for CPR.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>WIDER IMPLICATIONS<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The results of this review indicate a slightly higher LBR and CPR in immediate versus postponed FET. Thus, the standard clinical practice of postponing FET for at least one menstrual cycle following a failed fresh transfer or a freeze-all cycle may not be best clinical practice. However, as only retrospective cohort studies were assessed, the presence of selection bias is apparent, and the quality of evidence thus seems low. Randomised controlled trials including data on cancellation rates and reasons for cancellation are highly needed to provide high-grade evidence regarding clinical practice and patient counselling.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmab002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,13]],"date-time":"2021-01-13T09:19:31Z","timestamp":1610529571000},"page":"623-642","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Immediate versus postponed frozen embryo transfer after IVF\/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7574-5141","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sara J","family":"Bergenheim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2119-0013","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marte","family":"Saupstad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nina","family":"Pistoljevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anders Nyboe","family":"Andersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie Lyng","family":"Forman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K DK-1014, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristine","family":"L\u00f8ssl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8340-104X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anja","family":"Pinborg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fertility Department 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen \u00d8 DK-2100, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02070141","article-title":"Outcome of frozen embryo replacement cycles following elective cryopreservation of all embryos in women at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome","volume":"13","author":"Awonuga","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0206067","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0206067","article-title":"The interval between oocyte retrieval and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer does not affect the live birth rate and obstetrical outcomes","volume":"13","author":"Bourdon","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05405-4","article-title":"Effect of the time for embryo transfer from oocyte retrieval on clinical outcomes in freeze-all cycles: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"301","author":"Chen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B4"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B5","article-title":"ART in Europe, 2015: results generated from European registries by ESHRE\u2020","volume":"1","author":"Geyter Calhaz-Jorge","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003414.pub3","article-title":"Ayeleke Ro Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer","author":"Ghobara","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B7","first-page":"2282","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group","volume":"11","author":"Ginstr\u00f6m Ernstad","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-019-0560-1","article-title":"Delayed frozen embryo transfer failed to improve live birth rate and neonatal outcomes in patients requiring whole embryo freef","volume":"18","author":"He","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12696","article-title":"Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer: Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?","volume":"58","author":"Higgins","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.05.003","article-title":"Modified natural-cycle cryopreserved embryo transfer: is a washout period needed after a failed fresh cycle?","volume":"39","author":"Horowitz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-02858-3","article-title":"Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from time interval between a freeze-all cycle and a subsequent frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer","volume":"20","author":"Hu","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1949","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-020-01857-9","article-title":"Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"37","author":"Huang","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2019.11.74","article-title":"Timing of frozen-thawed embryo transfer after controlled ovarian stimulation in a non-elective freeze-all policy","volume":"7","author":"Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01420-1","article-title":"Increased pregnancy complications following frozen-thawed embryo transfer during an artificial cycle","volume":"36","author":"Jing","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1111-3","article-title":"Frozen blastocyst transfer outcomes in immediate versus delayed subsequent cycles following GnRH agonist or hCG triggers","volume":"35","author":"Kaye","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-017-0666-0","article-title":"A review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess female infertility-related quality of life","volume":"15","author":"Kitchen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1813","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der126","article-title":"Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: A functional genomics analysis","volume":"26","author":"Labarta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew306","article-title":"There is no evidence that the time from egg retrieval to embryo transfer affects live birth rates in a freeze-all strategy","volume":"32","author":"Lattes","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B19","author":"Lumley","year":"2018"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B3758713","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2234","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex285","article-title":"Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing","volume":"32","author":"Mackens","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2234","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex285","article-title":"Frozen embryo transfer: A review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing","volume":"32","author":"Mackens","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa026","article-title":"To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"Mackens","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1703","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.08.047","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset","volume":"106","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement","volume":"339","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1048-6","article-title":"Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle","volume":"35","author":"Ozgur","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B25","volume-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing","year":"2020"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","article-title":"Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Roque","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2541","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew194","article-title":"The effect of an immediate frozen embryo transfer following a freeze-all protocol: a retrospective analysis from two centres","volume":"31","author":"Santos-Ribeiro","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1202","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.12.140","article-title":"To delay or not to delay a frozen embryo transfer after a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt?","volume":"105","author":"Santos-Ribeiro","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092","article-title":"Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony","volume":"89","author":"Shapiro","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38;e17329","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000017329","article-title":"Frozen embryo transfer at the cleavage stage can be performed within the first menstrual cycle following the freeze-all strategy without adversely affecting the live birth rate: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study","volume":"98","author":"Song","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez006","article-title":"Pinborg A. Patients\u2019 attitudes and preferences towards a freeze-all strategy in ART treatment","volume":"34","author":"Stormlund","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2018.00092","article-title":"Daytime Variation in Serum Progesterone During the Mid-Luteal Phase in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment","author":"Thomsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)80080-5","article-title":"Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase","volume":"67","author":"Ubaldi","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt014","article-title":"Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles","volume":"19","author":"Venetis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12046","article-title":"Absent or Excessive Corpus Luteum Number Is Associated With Altered Maternal Vascular Health in Early Pregnancy","volume":"73","author":"von Versen-H\u00f6ynck","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"2021062405590617400_dmab002-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2016.11.013","article-title":"Cryopreserved embryo transfer: adjacent or non-adjacent to failed fresh long GnRH-agonist protocol IVF cycle","volume":"34","author":"Volodarsky-Perel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"}],"container-title":["Human Reproduction Update"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humupd\/article-pdf\/27\/4\/623\/38814006\/dmab002.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humupd\/article-pdf\/27\/4\/623\/38814006\/dmab002.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]],"date-time":"2021-06-24T06:00:14Z","timestamp":1624514414000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/humupd\/article\/27\/4\/623\/6139910"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,16]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmab002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1355-4786","1460-2369"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1355-4786","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2369","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,16]]}}}