{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T01:44:25Z","timestamp":1789609465413,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,7]],"date-time":"2020-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1594080000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Comparison of the short peripheral cannula (SPC) complication rate of patients with cellulitis receiving IV cefazolin via an elastomeric infuser with those receiving twice-daily bolus treatment (control group) in the Hospital in the Home service.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A randomized controlled study using elastomeric infuser versus bolus delivery of IV cefazolin via an SPC of patients referred to the Hospital in the Home service in the Northern Illawarra for treatment of cellulitis. A total of 104 patients were enrolled during the time period of May 2018 to January 2019. Primary outcome measures were SPC complications including phlebitis with a secondary outcome of patient satisfaction.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A total of 104 patients enrolled. After randomization there were 60 in the infuser group and 44 in the bolus group. Patient characteristics of age, gender, weight and mobility were similar for the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the endpoint of cannula complication rates. Patient satisfaction scores showed patient acceptance of both forms of treatment.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study suggests that using elastomeric infusers to deliver cefazolin via a short peripheral IV catheter has similar complication rates to traditional bolus delivery. Patients surveyed showed high levels of satisfaction with both forms of antibiotic delivery.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/jacamr\/dlaa033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,15]],"date-time":"2020-06-15T11:08:38Z","timestamp":1592219318000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Cannula complications using elastomeric infusers in Hospital in the Home"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Damian","family":"Ryan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital in the Home, Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Hospital District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Miller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ambulatory Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Hospital District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joanne","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ambulatory Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Hospital District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B1"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B2","year":"2016"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2007.01133.x","article-title":"Home intravenous antimicrobial infusion therapy: a viable option in older adults","volume":"55","author":"Cox","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cger.2008.10.002","article-title":"Hospital at home","volume":"25","author":"Cheng","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Geriatr Med"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.016","article-title":"Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in a teaching hospital-based practice: a retrospective cohort study describing experience and evolution over 10 years","volume":"39","author":"Barr","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Antimicrob Agents"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.2217\/1745509X.4.1.69","article-title":"Does \u2018Hospital in the Home\u2019 treatment prevent delirium?","volume":"4","author":"Caplan","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Aging Health"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1093\/gerona\/60.8.1035","article-title":"Effect of Hospital in the Home treatment on physical and cognitive function: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"60","author":"Caplan","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/1353-4505(96)00029-4","article-title":"Patients\u2019 and carers\u2019 satisfaction with hospital-in-the-home care","volume":"8","author":"Montalto","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-7-130","article-title":"Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada","volume":"7","author":"Lemelin","year":"2007","journal-title":". BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/14.4.285","article-title":"Hospital in the home is cost saving for appropriately selected patients: a comparison with in-hospital care","volume":"14","author":"MacIntyre","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-842X.2000.tb01573.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of the costs of hospital as compared with hospital in the home for acute medical patients","volume":"24","author":"Board","year":"2000","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Public Health"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2007.01487.x","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of home intravenous therapy","volume":"56","author":"Brooks","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B13","year":"2020"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1097\/NAN.0b013e31824237ce","article-title":"Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic considerations of peripheral access","volume":"35","author":"Dychter","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Infus Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0744","article-title":"The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND\/UCLA appropriateness method","volume":"163","author":"Chopra","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B16","year":"2010"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B17","first-page":"209","article-title":"Intravenous push medications in the home","volume":"22","author":"Poole","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Intraven Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1097\/NAN.0b013e3181cfcee4","article-title":"Intravenous administration issues: a comparison of intravenous insertions and complications in vancomycin versus other antibiotics","volume":"33","author":"Roszell","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Infus Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B19"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B20","author":"King"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B21","author":"Ryan-Agnew"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B22"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1097\/NAN.0b013e3182706719","article-title":"Comparison of postinfusion phlebitis in intravenous push versus intravenous piggyback cefazolin","volume":"35","author":"Biggar","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Infus Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1097\/NAN.0b013e31825af099","article-title":"Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections","volume":"35","author":"Hadaway","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Infus Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1097\/01.NAN.0000313655.65410.4e","article-title":"Catheter outcomes in home infusion","volume":"31","author":"Leone","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Infus Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2009.02.009","article-title":"Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients","volume":"37","author":"Lee","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/00129804-200611000-00004","article-title":"Evaluation of a visual infusion scale for determining appropriate discontinuation of peripheral intravenous catheters","volume":"29","author":"Gallant","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Inf Nurs"},{"key":"2021052617290109100_dlaa033-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1093\/jac\/dkv344","article-title":"Vascular access complications during outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at home: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"71","author":"Shrestha","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Antimicrob Chemother"}],"container-title":["JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jacamr\/article-pdf\/2\/3\/dlaa033\/38269562\/dlaa033.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jacamr\/article-pdf\/2\/3\/dlaa033\/38269562\/dlaa033.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T18:56:06Z","timestamp":1622055366000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jacamr\/article\/doi\/10.1093\/jacamr\/dlaa033\/5868353"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,7]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jacamr\/dlaa033","relation":{},"ISSN":["2632-1823"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2632-1823","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,7]]},"article-number":"dlaa033"}}