{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T22:42:55Z","timestamp":1792190575659,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,27]],"date-time":"2024-03-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711497600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"funder":[{"name":"Charlottesville Women\u2019s Four Miler Program"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this institutional review board\u2013approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159\/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149\/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155\/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P =\u2009.027).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbae012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,15]],"date-time":"2024-02-15T16:24:43Z","timestamp":1708014283000},"page":"277-287","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"6","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3174-0610","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew M","family":"Miller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shanna","family":"Mayorov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ramapriya","family":"Ganti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan V","family":"Nguyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carrie M","family":"Rochman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Caley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessie","family":"Jahjah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathy","family":"Repich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James T","family":"Patrie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, VA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roger T","family":"Anderson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, VA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9131-3974","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jennifer A","family":"Harvey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, NY , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4072-8883","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Timothy B","family":"Rooney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, VA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008","article-title":"Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography","volume":"138","author":"Carney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study","volume":"155","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","article-title":"Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"McCormack","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa062790","article-title":"Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer","volume":"356","author":"Boyd","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2301020870","article-title":"Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk","volume":"230","author":"Harvey","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2022.09.007","article-title":"Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"66","author":"Bodewes","year":"2022","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2022.110513","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening","volume":"156","author":"Coffey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2752","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4650-6","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation","volume":"27","author":"Fallenberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-016-0681-8","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts","volume":"24","author":"Mori","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2394","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3271-1","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis","volume":"24","author":"Cheung","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-014-3023-6","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided","volume":"146","author":"Fallenberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110838","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2023.110838","article-title":"Preoperative staging by multimodal imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared to conventional mammography, ultrasound, and MRI","volume":"163","author":"Daniaux","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7087408","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/7087408","article-title":"Can contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) reduce benign breast biopsy","volume":"2022","author":"Liew","year":"2022","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.12.011","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes","volume":"42","author":"Phillips","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2023.05.014","article-title":"Analytic hierarchy process analysis of patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography versus MRI as supplemental screening options for breast cancer","volume":"20","author":"Berg","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbz093","article-title":"Preferences and attitudes regarding adjunct breast cancer screening among patients with dense breasts","volume":"2","author":"Miller","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Breast Imag."},{"issue":"1","key":"2024092311562394100_CIT0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-12-0570","article-title":"Which risk model to use? Clinical implications of the ACS MRI screening guidelines","volume":"22","author":"Ozanne","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"}],"container-title":["Journal of Breast Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/3\/277\/59242461\/wbae012.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/3\/277\/59242461\/wbae012.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,23]],"date-time":"2024-09-23T07:56:32Z","timestamp":1727078192000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article\/6\/3\/277\/7636263"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,27]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,27]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jbi\/wbae012","relation":{},"ISSN":["2631-6110","2631-6129"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2631-6110","type":"print"},{"value":"2631-6129","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,27]]}}}