{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T03:15:05Z","timestamp":1784690105847,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]],"date-time":"2024-04-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The objectives of this Society of Breast Imaging (SBI)-member survey study were to assess the current imaging patterns for evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic breast implant integrity, including modalities used and imaging intervals.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A 12-question survey assessing the frequency of imaging modalities used to evaluate implant integrity, approximate number of breast implant integrity studies requested per month, intervals of integrity studies, and referring provider and radiology practice characteristics was distributed to members of the SBI.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The survey response rate was 7.6% (143\/1890). Of responding radiologists, 54.2% (77\/142) were in private, 29.6% (42\/142) in academic, and 16.2% (23\/142) in hybrid practice. Among respondents, the most common initial examination for evaluating implant integrity was MRI without contrast at 53.1% (76\/143), followed by handheld US at 46.9% (67\/143). Of respondents using US, 67.4% (91\/135) also evaluated the breast tissue for abnormalities. Among respondents, 34.1% (46\/135) reported being very confident or confident in US for diagnosing implant rupture. There was a range of reported intervals for performing implant integrity studies: 39.1% (43\/110) every 2-3 years, 26.4% (29\/110) every 4-5 years, 15.5% (17\/110) every 6-10 years, and 19.1% (21\/110) every 10 years.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>For assessment of implant integrity, the majority of respondents (53.2%, 76\/143) reported MRI as initial imaging test. US is less costly, but the minority of respondents (34.1%, 46\/135) had confidence in US performance. Also, the minority of respondents (39.1%, 43\/110) performed implant integrity evaluations every 2-3 years per the FDA recommendations for asymptomatic surveillance.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbae017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]],"date-time":"2024-04-16T22:18:51Z","timestamp":1713305931000},"page":"271-276","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance Practice: Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists in the Society of Breast Imaging"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Ali","family":"Moosavi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center , Hershey, PA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jason","family":"Ha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Penn State University College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brianna","family":"Papoutsis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Penn State University College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erik","family":"Lehman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University , State College, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5304-2392","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alison","family":"Chetlen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center , Hershey, PA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2625-2014","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Angela I","family":"Choe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center , Hershey, PA , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0001","author":"American Society of Plastic Surgeons","year":"2020"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0002","volume-title":"Safety of Silicone Breast Implants","author":"Institute of Medicine","year":"1999"},{"issue":"5S","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7S","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000003941","article-title":"Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction","volume":"140","author":"Panchal","year":"2017","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0004","author":"U.S. Food","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-017-1735-x","article-title":"Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction","volume":"7","author":"Fanakidou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.3952","article-title":"Body image and quality of life of breast cancer patients: influence of timing and stage of breast reconstruction","volume":"25","author":"Teo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Psycho-Oncology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1177\/229255030801600403","article-title":"Incidence of capsular contracture in silicone versus saline cosmetic augmentation mammoplasty: a meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"El-Sheikh","year":"2008","journal-title":"Can J Plast Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.21037\/gs.2016.09.12","article-title":"Silicone breast implant rupture: a review","volume":"6","author":"Hillard","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gland Surg"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.138.7.801","article-title":"Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture","volume":"138","author":"H\u00f6lmich","year":"2003","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0010","author":"U.S"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000006812","article-title":"Breast implant imaging surveillance among U.S. plastic surgeons: U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations versus clinical reality","volume":"145","author":"Carr","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.163.1.8010248","article-title":"Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques","volume":"163","author":"Everson","year":"1994","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina57050440","article-title":"The value of ultrasound in the evaluation of the integrity of silicone breast implants","volume":"57","author":"Rukanskiene\u0307","year":"2021","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0014","first-page":"45","article-title":"Morphea after silicone implants","volume":"31","author":"Wollina","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta Dermatovenerol Croat"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.03.014","article-title":"The sonographic appearances of breast implant rupture","volume":"68","author":"Lake","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"S1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rxeng.2020.10.011","article-title":"Is breast ultrasound a good alternative to magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating implant integrity","volume":"64","author":"Secco","year":"2022","journal-title":"Radiologi\u0301a (Engl Ed)"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0017","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0018","first-page":"360","volume":"5","author":"Le-Petross","year":"2023","journal-title":"Assessment, complications, and surveillance of breast implants: making sense of 2022 FDA Breast Implant Guidance. J Breast Imag"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002990","article-title":"US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients","volume":"269","author":"Coroneos","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008408","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasonography in breast implant rupture diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"148","author":"Macedo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318254b43b","article-title":"Economic analysis of screening strategies for rupture of silicone gel breast implants","volume":"130","author":"Chung","year":"2012","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0022","author":"Chetlen"},{"issue":"5S","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2018.03.009","article-title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\u00ae breast implant evaluation","volume":"15","author":"Lourenco","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"1089","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20180098","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20180098","article-title":"Imaging findings of mammary and systemic silicone deposition secondary to breast implants","volume":"91","author":"Samreen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024052713430399700_CIT0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000008632","article-title":"Silent rupture of silicone gel breast implants: high-resolution ultrasound scans and surveys of 584 women","volume":"149","author":"Salzman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Breast Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/3\/271\/57927111\/wbae017.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/3\/271\/57927111\/wbae017.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]],"date-time":"2024-05-27T13:53:27Z","timestamp":1716818007000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article\/6\/3\/271\/7646469"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jbi\/wbae017","relation":{},"ISSN":["2631-6110","2631-6129"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2631-6110","type":"print"},{"value":"2631-6129","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,16]]}}}