{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T08:45:31Z","timestamp":1790757931313,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]],"date-time":"2024-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719532800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To evaluate the effects of the Enhancing Quality Using the Inspection Program (EQUIP) on quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) at an academic medical center.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>EQUIP audit logs for technologist image quality review as well as mammography unit QA and QC formed the basis for study data. One randomly selected screening mammogram was evaluated by the lead interpreting physician (LIP) using EQUIP criteria for each technologist for each imaging site worked, initially semiannually and then monthly. One randomly selected screening mammogram interpreted by each interpreting physician (IP) for each imaging site was evaluated on a semiannual basis. Quarterly, the LIP reviewed QA and QC logs for each mammography unit with deficiencies further investigated.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Of 214\u2009965 eligible screening mammograms performed, 5955 (2.8%) underwent EQUIP image quality review. Five were found to be technically inadequate (0.08%, 5955\/214\u2009965). The LIP identified 20 significant interpretive differences compared with the clinical interpretation resulting in 10 biopsies and 7 previously undetected malignancies, with supplemental cancer detection rate of 1.2\/1000 cases reviewed. Two hundred ninety mammography unit QA\/QC reviews identified 31 potential deficiencies, 29 of which were due to human documentation error (93.4%).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>EQUIP review of both IP and technologists\u2019 quality and mammography unit QA\/QC logs as performed identified few deficiencies. EQUIP policies should be evaluated at each institution and modified to best utilize resources and provide opportunities for meaningful quality improvement. Although not an EQUIP focus, supplemental cancer detection was observed as might be expected with double reading.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbae034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,29]],"date-time":"2024-06-29T06:06:30Z","timestamp":1719641190000},"page":"388-396","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The FDA Enhancing Quality Using the Inspection Program (EQUIP) Breast Imaging Quality Initiative. 5-Year Clinical Experience"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"6","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7009-854X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jeffrey R","family":"Hawley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cynthia","family":"Ha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Linda","family":"Cai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Clayton R","family":"Taylor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0001","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","year":"2024"},{"issue":"13","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2971","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.32859","article-title":"Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: results in 549,091 women","volume":"126","author":"Duffy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2014.04.008","article-title":"Hidden costs of poor image quality: a radiologist\u2019s perspective","volume":"11","author":"Reiner","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.219.1.r01ap16192","article-title":"Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection","volume":"219","author":"Birdwell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130724","article-title":"Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography","volume":"270","author":"Bae","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.178.4.1780797","article-title":"Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer","volume":"178","author":"Taplin","year":"2002","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2017.09.002","article-title":"Clinical image quality and sensitivity in an organized mammography screening program","volume":"69","author":"Th\u00e9berge","year":"2018","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2014.09.013","article-title":"The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists\u2019 ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice","volume":"22","author":"Henderson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3202","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4718571","article-title":"Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography","volume":"39","author":"Warren","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5335","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-020-07679-8","article-title":"How does image quality affect radiologists\u2019 perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography","volume":"31","author":"Boita","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-13-208","article-title":"Mammogram image quality as a potential contributor to disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: an observational study","volume":"13","author":"Rauscher","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2019.09.003","article-title":"The economics of quality and safety in radiology: accreditation programs and landmark legislation","volume":"60","author":"Stein","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0013","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0014","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.11.036","article-title":"Effect of the EQUIP initiative on additional images performed at screening mammography: a pilot study","volume":"73","author":"Falcon","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbad075","article-title":"Sustaining mammography image quality with a technologist coaching program in the era of the Enhancing Quality Using the Inspection Program (EQUIP)","volume":"5","author":"Kozlov","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Breast Imaging"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0017","author":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0018","volume-title":"Hologic Selenia Dimensions Quality Control Manual","year":"2016"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0019","first-page":"031403","article-title":"Comparison of screening full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis technical recalls","volume":"6","author":"Salkowski","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Imaging Bellingham Wash"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbad039","article-title":"Analysis of technical repeat studies in screening mammography","volume":"5","author":"Martaindale","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Breast Imaging"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0021","volume-title":"MQSA Inspection Procedures Version 7.09 Revision 07\/2017"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0022","volume-title":"Digital Mammography Quality Control Manual","author":"Berns","year":"2018"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2018171010","article-title":"Double reading in breast cancer screening: cohort evaluation in the CO-OPS Trial","volume":"287","author":"Taylor-Phillips","year":"2018","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0159806","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0159806","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of double reading versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme","volume":"11","author":"Posso","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-018-4864-1","article-title":"Screening mammography: benefit of double reading by breast density","volume":"171","author":"Euler-Chelpin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1038\/s41416-018-0195-6","article-title":"Impact of the second reader on screening outcome at blinded double reading of digital screening mammograms","volume":"119","author":"Coolen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2744","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4636-4","article-title":"Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density","volume":"27","author":"Weigel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2016161174","article-title":"National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium","volume":"283","author":"Lehman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2021204379","article-title":"Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of screening mammography: a National Mammography Database (NMD) study","volume":"300","author":"Lee","year":"2021","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024073019321354200_CIT0030"}],"container-title":["Journal of Breast Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/4\/388\/58695047\/wbae034.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article-pdf\/6\/4\/388\/58695047\/wbae034.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]],"date-time":"2024-07-31T01:14:02Z","timestamp":1722388442000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbi\/article\/6\/4\/388\/7701470"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jbi\/wbae034","relation":{},"ISSN":["2631-6110","2631-6129"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2631-6110","type":"print"},{"value":"2631-6129","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]}}}