{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T18:19:40Z","timestamp":1789755580996,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,15]],"date-time":"2021-02-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1613347200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"funder":[{"name":"History of American Obstetrics and Gynecology"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>From 1995 to 2014, intrauterine devices (IUDs) rose from ranking 10th (out of 11) among contraceptive methods to being the fourth most popular, outnumbered only by the pill, sterilization, and condoms. In 1995, the IUD had been largely abandoned by American doctors; two decades later, major medical associations promoted it as a \u201cfirst line\u201d method for prospective users of all ages. This paper explains the rapid and dramatic increase in intrauterine contraception by exploring three influential factors from the 1970s-1980s \u2013 the Dalkon Shield disaster, the lack of innovation in contraceptive research and development, and the moral panic over teen pregnancy in America \u2013 that created circumstances by the early 2000s in which health care providers became more receptive to long-acting reversible contraception. Key thought leaders in obstetrics and gynecology took it upon themselves to rehabilitate the IUD in the court of medical opinion and succeeded in securing professional approval of the device as the initial step in its resurrection.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/jhmas\/jrab004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]],"date-time":"2021-02-05T14:09:09Z","timestamp":1612534149000},"page":"191-216","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["The Comeback of the IUD in Twenty-First Century USA"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"76","author":[{"given":"Elizabeth Siegel","family":"Watkins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,15]]},"container-title":["Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jhmas\/article-pdf\/76\/2\/191\/36992724\/jrab004.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jhmas\/article-pdf\/76\/2\/191\/36992724\/jrab004.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,9]],"date-time":"2021-04-09T00:01:51Z","timestamp":1617926511000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jhmas\/article\/76\/2\/191\/6135067"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,15]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jhmas\/jrab004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-5045","1468-4373"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-5045","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-4373","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,15]]}}}