{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T01:05:27Z","timestamp":1792112727269,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]],"date-time":"2020-06-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1592870400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence (Chief Investigator A Barratt","award":["1104136"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1104136"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001026","name":"National Breast Cancer Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001026","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Cancer Institute New South Wales Early Career Fellowship","award":["14\/ECF\/1\u201306"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["14\/ECF\/1\u201306"]}]},{"name":"WA Health Translation Network Early Career Fellowship"},{"name":"Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator","award":["1174523"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1174523"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Breast screening programs replaced film mammography with digital mammography, and the effects of this practice shift in population screening on health outcomes can be measured through examination of cancer detection and interval cancer rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis were undertaken. Seven databases were searched for publications that compared film with digital mammography within the same population of asymptomatic women and reported cancer detection and\/or interval cancer rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The analysis included 24 studies with 16\u00a0583\u00a0743 screening examinations (10 968 843 film and 5\u00a0614\u00a0900 digital). The pooled difference in the cancer detection rate showed an increase of 0.51 per 1000 screens (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19 to 0.83), greater relative increase for ductal carcinoma in situ (25.2%, 95% CI = 17.4% to 33.5%) than invasive (4%, 95% CI = \u22123% to 13%), and a recall rate increase of 6.95 (95% CI = 3.47 to 10.42) per 1000 screens after the transition from film to digital mammography. Seven studies (80.8% of screens) reported interval cancers: the pooled difference showed no change in the interval cancer rate with \u22120.02 per 1000 screens (95% CI = \u22120.06 to 0.03). Restricting analysis to studies at low risk of bias resulted in findings consistent with the overall pooled results for all outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The increase in cancer detection following the practice shift to digital mammography did not translate into a reduction in the interval cancer rate. Recall rates were increased. These results suggest the transition from film to digital mammography did not result in health benefits for screened women. This analysis reinforces the need to carefully evaluate effects of future changes in technology, such as tomosynthesis, to ensure new technology leads to improved health outcomes and beyond technical gains.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djaa080","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,6]],"date-time":"2020-06-06T15:08:46Z","timestamp":1591456126000},"page":"16-26","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"113","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8969-2554","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Farber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3641-952X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nehmat","family":"Houssami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sally","family":"Wortley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4814-3241","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gemma","family":"Jacklyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3801-8180","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael L","family":"Marinovich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"McGeechan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Barratt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0137-3218","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katy","family":"Bell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2205","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.177","article-title":"The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review","volume":"108","author":"Marmot","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0970","article-title":"Harms of breast cancer screening: systematic review to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation","volume":"164","author":"Nelson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"7543","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7543.678","article-title":"Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer","volume":"332","author":"Irwig","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"mar30 14","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h1566","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h1566","article-title":"Assessment of changes to screening programmes: why randomisation is important","volume":"350","author":"Bell","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2293021171","article-title":"Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I Study","volume":"229","author":"Skaane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-011-1748-z","article-title":"Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers","volume":"130","author":"Esserman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.20892\/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0050","article-title":"Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?","volume":"14","author":"Houssami","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cancer Biol Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.179.3.1790671","article-title":"Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer","volume":"179","author":"Lewin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"17","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening","volume":"353","author":"Pisano","year":"2005","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-3882-0","article-title":"Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography","volume":"158","author":"Weber","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2443061478","article-title":"Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study","volume":"244","author":"Skaane","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015150733","article-title":"Digital compared with screen-film mammography: measures of diagnostic accuracy among women screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program","volume":"278","author":"Prummel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"850","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3431-3","article-title":"Does digital mammography suppose an advance in early diagnosis? Trends in performance indicators 6 years after digitalization","volume":"25","author":"Sala","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.09.018","article-title":"Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands","volume":"50","author":"Nederend","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14131502","article-title":"Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography","volume":"272","author":"Hofvind","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2303","article-title":"Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts","volume":"189","author":"Del Turco","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2011.06.009","article-title":"Digital mammography screening: weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis","volume":"53","author":"de Gelder","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djy121","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis or mammography: a meta-analysis of cancer detection and recall","volume":"110","author":"Marinovich","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"10","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"62","author":"Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B20","first-page":"i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ (Online)"},{"key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B21","author":"Farber"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2512081235","article-title":"Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data","volume":"251","author":"Vinnicombe","year":"2009","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.1720","article-title":"Digital mammography: its impact on recall rates and cancer detection rates in a small community-based radiology practice","volume":"193","author":"Vernacchia","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2307","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1807-6","article-title":"Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?","volume":"20","author":"Van Ongeval","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"16","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.06.020","article-title":"National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study Group. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens","volume":"49","author":"van Luijt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"9","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3810","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4757-4","article-title":"Screen-detected versus interval cancers: effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme","volume":"27","author":"Timmermans","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2016.02.001","article-title":"Detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive value of digital compared to screen-film mammography in the Quebec population-based breast cancer screening program","volume":"67","author":"Theberge","year":"2016","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1080\/02841850500223547","article-title":"Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading","volume":"46","author":"Skaane","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.10419","article-title":"Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program","volume":"202","author":"Seradour","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-018-4122-2","article-title":"Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening","volume":"18","author":"Sankatsing","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461070200","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST","volume":"246","author":"Pisano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1968-3","article-title":"The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit","volume":"21","author":"Perry","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.3109\/02841851003691961","article-title":"Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program","volume":"51","author":"Lipasti","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.218.3.r01mr29873","article-title":"Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations","volume":"218","author":"Lewin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sembd.2007.01.002","article-title":"Clinical trials in full-field digital mammography","volume":"9","author":"Lewin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Semin Breast Dis"},{"issue":"8","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study","volume":"155","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13904","article-title":"Breast cancer characteristics associated with digital versus film-screen mammography for screen-detected and interval cancers","volume":"205","author":"Henderson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2014.09.013","article-title":"The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice","volume":"22","author":"Henderson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2007.02.030","article-title":"Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program","volume":"64","author":"Heddson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.2157","article-title":"Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program","volume":"193","author":"Hambly","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11110159","article-title":"Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes","volume":"260","author":"Glynn","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12942","article-title":"Performance characteristics of digital vs film screen mammography in community practice","volume":"24","author":"Dabbous","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13122567","article-title":"Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program","volume":"268","author":"Chiarelli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-015-9843-z","article-title":"Impact of the introduction of digital mammography in an organized screening program on the recall and detection rate","volume":"29","author":"Campari","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Digit Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-011-1430-5","article-title":"Characterizing the impact of 25\u00a0years of DCIS treatment","volume":"129","author":"Ozanne","year":"2011","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"6","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2014.981","article-title":"Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms","volume":"174","author":"Tosteson","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"issue":"24","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2353","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsr1504363","article-title":"Breast-cancer screening\u2014viewpoint of the IARC Working Group","volume":"372","author":"Lauby-Secretan","year":"2015","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(06)70617-9","article-title":"Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes","volume":"7","author":"Houssami","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2067","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1786-7","article-title":"Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates","volume":"20","author":"Bluekens","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2021010414401514600_djaa080-B50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.21037\/tcr.2017.06.39","article-title":"Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) in population breast cancer screening: a protocol for a collaborative individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"Houssami","year":"2017","journal-title":"Transl Cancer Res"}],"container-title":["JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jnci\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/jnci\/djaa080\/33801195\/djaa080.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jnci\/article-pdf\/113\/1\/16\/35388478\/djaa080.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jnci\/article-pdf\/113\/1\/16\/35388478\/djaa080.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]],"date-time":"2021-01-04T14:50:32Z","timestamp":1609771832000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jnci\/article\/113\/1\/16\/5859630"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/djaa080","relation":{},"ISSN":["0027-8874","1460-2105"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0027-8874","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-2105","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]}}}