{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T20:30:39Z","timestamp":1770237039701,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medical Law Review"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,9,1]]},"DOI":"10.1093\/medlaw\/9.3.221","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,27]],"date-time":"2005-10-27T16:38:18Z","timestamp":1130431098000},"page":"221-236","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Human Beings, Persons and Conjoined Twins: An Ethical Analysis of the Judgment in Re A"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Harris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","container-title":["Medical Law Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/medlaw\/article-pdf\/9\/3\/221\/3166437\/090221.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,23]],"date-time":"2017-08-23T14:01:11Z","timestamp":1503496871000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/medlaw\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1093\/medlaw\/9.3.221"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2001,9,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,9,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/medlaw\/9.3.221","relation":{},"ISSN":["0967-0742","1464-3790"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0967-0742","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-3790","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2001,9,1]]}}}