{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T23:42:10Z","timestamp":1773186130592,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>When a system comes under strain, the persons most likely to suffer from the repercussions are those at and beyond its margins, as the age-old rule \u2018Help yourself before helping others\u2019 typically guides crisis management within the system. Similar behavioural patterns on the side of policy-makers have left a distinct mark on the healthcare rights of forced migrants in the context and aftermath of the so-called \u2018migration crisis\u2019 of 2015\u20132016, as this article demonstrates. Following the crisis, this group of persons, who are traditionally situated at the margins of society already, have been pushed further outside social and healthcare systems through increasingly restrictive incorporation policies across Europe. By analysing recent legislative reforms in four countries (Germany, Italy, Sweden, and the UK) which stood out in various ways during the crisis, this article sheds light on the increasing politicisation and polarisation of the intersection of incorporation and healthcare. It shows that the crisis induced similar responses of legal adaptation in countries with fundamentally different healthcare and incorporation systems, and analyses the dynamics behind such processes of change. The article thereby contributes to a better understanding of healthcare legislation as a reflection of political opposition to or acceptance (if not fuelling) of societal inequalities.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/medlaw\/fwac043","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]],"date-time":"2022-11-12T18:49:16Z","timestamp":1668278956000},"page":"658-679","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Inequality by design: The politics behind forced migrants\u2019 access to healthcare"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9174-3920","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mechthild","family":"Roos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Comparative Politics, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Augsburg , Augsburg, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]]},"container-title":["Medical Law Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/medlaw\/article-pdf\/30\/4\/658\/47751048\/fwac043.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/medlaw\/article-pdf\/30\/4\/658\/47751048\/fwac043.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,9]],"date-time":"2022-12-09T07:54:44Z","timestamp":1670572484000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/medlaw\/article\/30\/4\/658\/6825431"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/medlaw\/fwac043","relation":{},"ISSN":["0967-0742","1464-3790"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0967-0742","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-3790","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]]}}}