{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T17:51:58Z","timestamp":1786125118847,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["NEUROSURGERY","NEUROS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>BACKGROUND:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Laminoplasty is an established treatment for cervical myelopathy. Multiple variations have emerged, many advocating the use of allograft, but controversy persists.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>OBJECTIVE:<\/jats:bold>\n                    To assess medium-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent laminoplasty with autograft at our institution.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>METHODS:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Thirty-two consecutive patients (19 male, 13 female, average age 66 yr) from our prospective outcome registry that underwent cervical laminoplasty between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed immediately postoperatively and at 6-mo follow-up. Parameters included patient perception of outcome, Nurick score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale for neck pain, and SF-36.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>RESULTS:<\/jats:bold>\n                    On retrospective analysis, all patients felt improved at 3 mo postoperatively; at 2 yr, this rate was 91%. Improvements were seen in Nurick scores, from 3.16 \u00b1 0.9 preoperatively to 1.94 \u00b1 0.8 at 2 yr; NDI score from 28.7% \u00b1 9% preoperatively to 20.8% \u00b1 9.6% at 2 yr; visual analog scale from 2.8 \u00b1 1.2 preoperatively to 1.7 \u00b1 0.9 at 2 yr; and SF-36 physical component summary from 27.9 \u00b1 10 preoperatively to 37.8 \u00b1 11.9 at 2 yr. All values reached significance at all follow-up points (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                    &lt; .05) with the exception of 6-mo NDI values (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                    = .062). No C5 palsy, graft complications, or reclosure was observed in any patient during the follow-up period.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>CONCLUSION:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Laminoplasty with autograft is a safe and effective method to treat cervical myelopathy, with good medium-term clinical outcome. No reclosures were observed. Bony fusion was seen in all cases on CT scan. Our study found good outcomes in the performance of open-door laminoplasty without hardware, in the treatment of cervical stenosis.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyw058","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,19]],"date-time":"2017-05-19T00:39:51Z","timestamp":1495154391000},"page":"934-941","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Laminoplasty: Results at Two Years"],"prefix":"10.1227","volume":"80","author":[{"given":"Melissa M.","family":"Stamates","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael X.","family":"Cui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben Z.","family":"Roitberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"bib1-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1179\/174313209X459084","article-title":"Clinical and functional outcomes of laminoplasty and laminectomy","volume":"32","author":"Hardman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurol Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib2-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.10.SPINE1498","article-title":"Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes","volume":"22","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"bib3-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198310000-00003","article-title":"Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy","volume":"8","author":"Hirabayashi","year":"1976","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"22","key":"bib4-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2404","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199911150-00019","article-title":"Complications of buttress plate stabilization of cervical corpectomy","volume":"24","author":"Riew","year":"1999","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib5-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/S1529-9430(01)00008-0","article-title":"Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy","volume":"1","author":"Satomi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"12","key":"bib6-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000065487.82469.D9","article-title":"Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"28","author":"Suda","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib7-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI.2008.4.08176","article-title":"Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty","volume":"9","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"26","key":"bib8-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2985","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815cda83","article-title":"The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles","volume":"32","author":"Hosono","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"bib9-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00179972","article-title":"Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study","volume":"19","author":"Baba","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"26","key":"bib10-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2998","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b","article-title":"Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy\u2013average 14-year follow-up study","volume":"31","author":"Chiba","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"15","key":"bib11-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182498434","article-title":"Impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes of open-door laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy -minimum 5-year follow-up study","volume":"37","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"25","key":"bib12-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1634","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318215552c","article-title":"Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty","volume":"36","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib13-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.11.SPINE14427","article-title":"Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review","volume":"23","author":"Duetzmann","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib14-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1080\/17453670710014770","article-title":"Open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: good outcome in 12 patients using suture anchor fixation","volume":"79","author":"Yang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib15-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20121217-23","article-title":"Modified plate-only open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy","volume":"36","author":"Yang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib16-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2004.02.040","article-title":"Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"62","author":"Wang","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib17-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1394297","article-title":"Neck pain following laminoplasty","volume":"5","author":"Mesfin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib18-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007","article-title":"Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion","volume":"10","author":"Carreon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"bib19-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828bb296","article-title":"Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus french-door technique","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"1","key":"bib20-20231012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1341606","article-title":"Neck pain following cervical laminoplasty: does preservation of the C2 muscle attchements and\/or C7 matter?","volume":"4","author":"Riew","year":"2013","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/neurosurgery\/article-pdf\/80\/6\/934\/32600213\/nyw058.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006123-201706000-00014","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:50:31Z","timestamp":1786121431000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/00006123-201706000-00014"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,15]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/neuros\/nyw058","relation":{},"ISSN":["0148-396X","1524-4040"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0148-396X","type":"print"},{"value":"1524-4040","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,15]]}}}