{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T23:30:53Z","timestamp":1787009453552,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665360000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In discussing whether legal systems are necessarily coercive, legal philosophers usually appeal to thought experiments involving angels or other morally driven beings who need no coercion to organise their social lives. Such appeals have invited criticism. Critics have not only challenged the relevance of such thought experiments to our understanding of legal systems; they have also argued that, contrary to the intuitions of most legal philosophers, the \u2018man on the Clapham Omnibus\u2019 would not hold that there is law in a society of angels because the view that law is necessarily coercive \u2018enjoys widespread support among laypersons\u2019. This is obviously an empirical claim. Critics, however, never systematically polled the \u2018man on the Clapham Omnibus\u2019. We boarded that bus. This article discusses findings from five empirical studies on the relationship between law and coercion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/ojls\/gqac014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,24]],"date-time":"2022-08-24T09:12:22Z","timestamp":1661332342000},"page":"97-123","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Law, Coercion and Folk Intuitions"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"43","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1473-166X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lucas","family":"Miotto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Senior Lecturer in Law, Leeds Beckett University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guilherme F C F","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Professor at Insper Institute of Education and Research"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Noel","family":"Struchiner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor of Law and Philosophy, PUC-Rio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"container-title":["Oxford Journal of Legal Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ojls\/article-pdf\/43\/1\/97\/49521991\/gqac014.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ojls\/article-pdf\/43\/1\/97\/49521991\/gqac014.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,14]],"date-time":"2023-03-14T09:26:05Z","timestamp":1678785965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ojls\/article\/43\/1\/97\/6754881"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,14]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ojls\/gqac014","relation":{},"ISSN":["0143-6503","1464-3820"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0143-6503","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-3820","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]}}}