{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T13:57:59Z","timestamp":1775743079333,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]],"date-time":"2023-12-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701993600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/pages\/standard-publication-reuse-rights"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Interspinous process devices (IPDs) were developed as minimally invasive alternatives to open decompression surgery for spinal stenosis. However, given high treatment failure and reoperation rates, there has been minimal adoption by spine surgeons. This study leveraged a national claims database to characterize national IPD usage patterns and postoperative outcomes after IPD implantation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Method<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Using the PearlDiver database, we identified all patients who underwent 1- or 2-level IPD implantation between 2010 and 2018. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of the number of IPD levels implanted and reoperation up to 3\u2009years after the index surgery. Right-censored Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for duration of reoperation-free survival and compared with log-rank tests.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Patients (n\u2009=\u20094865) received 1-level (n\u2009=\u20093246) or 2-level (n\u2009=\u20091619) IPDs. Patients who were older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01\u20131.03, P\u2009&amp;lt;\u2009.001), male (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 116\u20131.50, P\u2009&amp;lt;\u2009.001), and obese (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05\u20131.36, P\u2009&amp;lt;\u2009.01) were significantly more likely to receive a 2-level IPD than to receive a 1-level IPD. The 3-year reoperation rate was 9.3% of patients when mortality was accounted for during the follow-up period. Older age decreased (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.97\u20130.99, P\u2009=\u2009.0039) likelihood of reoperation, whereas 1-level IPD (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01\u20131.89, P\u2009=\u2009.048), Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01\u20131.14, P\u2009=\u2009.018), and performing concomitant open decompression increased the likelihood of reoperation (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.35\u20132.09, P\u2009=\u2009.0014).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Compared with 1-level IPDs, 2-level IPDs were implanted more frequently in older, male, and obese patients. The 3-year reoperation rate was 9.3%. Concomitant open decompression with IPD placement was identified as a significant risk factor for subsequent reoperation and warrants future investigation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/pm\/pnad159","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]],"date-time":"2023-12-08T00:15:06Z","timestamp":1701994506000},"page":"283-290","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Characterizing utilization patterns and reoperation risk factors of interspinous process devices: analysis of a national claims database"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Hao","family":"Tan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5517-1438","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Erin A","family":"Yamamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Spencer","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7002-7151","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jung","family":"Yoo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Kark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Clifford","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josiah","family":"Orina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Travis","family":"Philipp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Donald A","family":"Ross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christina","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Won Hyung A","family":"Ryu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR 97239, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2143","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06339-1","article-title":"Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Jensen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.1946","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"303","author":"Haig","year":"2010","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcp0708097","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"358","author":"Katz","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.11.014","article-title":"Management for lumbar spinal stenosis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"85","author":"Wei","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1022542","article-title":"Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the \u201cclassic\u201d open approach","volume":"51","author":"Rahman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5413.114909","article-title":"Complications in lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective analysis","volume":"47","author":"Proietti","year":"2013","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09369","article-title":"Complications in spine surgery: a review","volume":"13","author":"Nasser","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"13","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000220652.39970.c2","article-title":"Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols","volume":"31","author":"Rampersaud","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s11916-020-0845-2","article-title":"Minimally invasive lumbar decompression and interspinous process device for the management of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a literature review","volume":"24","author":"Merkow","year":"2020","journal-title":"Curr Pain Headache Rep"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1038\/nrneurol.2012.110","article-title":"Paradigm changes in spine surgery\u2014evolution of minimally invasive techniques","volume":"8","author":"Smith","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nat Rev Neurol"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2017.06.061","article-title":"Indirect decompression in spinal surgery","volume":"44","author":"Yoshihara","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.05.02","article-title":"Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"5","author":"Vaishnav","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/629698","article-title":"A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization","volume":"2012","author":"Gomleksiz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Adv Orthop"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/975052","article-title":"Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future","volume":"2014","author":"Gazzeri","year":"2014","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3180331352","article-title":"Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine","volume":"20","author":"Bono","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0199623","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0199623","article-title":"Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Poetscher","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jot.2020.07.003","article-title":"Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Orthop Translat"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmr.2022.01.006","article-title":"Novel technologies in interventional pain management","volume":"33","author":"Eshraghi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2017.06.15","article-title":"Effect of body mass index on patient outcomes of surgical intervention for the lumbar spine","volume":"3","author":"Flippin","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.1.SPINE201785","article-title":"Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries","volume":"35","author":"Carroll","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E14","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.FOCUS15244","article-title":"Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study","volume":"39","author":"Gazzeri","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B22","author":"R Core Team","year":"2019"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200704000-00003","article-title":"Interspinous process spacers","volume":"15","author":"Kim","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.12998\/wjcc.v2.i9.402","article-title":"Interspinous posterior devices: what is the real surgical indication?","volume":"2","author":"Landi","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Clin Cases"},{"issue":"01","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Indications and contraindications: interspinous process decompression devices in lumbar spine surgery","volume":"76","author":"Siewe","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Part A Central Eur Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.3233\/BMR-2009-0232","article-title":"Association between age, sex, BMI and CT-evaluated spinal degeneration features","volume":"22","author":"Kalichman","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil"},{"issue":"19","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2058","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318145a3a9","article-title":"Prevalence of lumbar facet arthrosis and its relationship to age, sex, and race: an anatomic study of cadaveric specimens","volume":"32","author":"Eubanks","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.22444","article-title":"Degenerative endplate changes of the lumbosacral spine: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI profiles related to age, sex, and spinal level","volume":"33","author":"Savvopoulou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"issue":"suppl 9","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S125","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d8342c","article-title":"The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review","volume":"35","author":"Schuster","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B30","first-page":"172","article-title":"Operative mortality with elective surgery in older adults","volume":"4","author":"Finlayson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Effect Clin Pract"},{"issue":"suppl 2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B31","first-page":"3","article-title":"Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetics","volume":"88","author":"Batti\u00e9","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-020-02032-7","article-title":"Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-0967-z","article-title":"Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"18","author":"Kuchta","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E8","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.FOCUS1047","article-title":"Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device","volume":"28","author":"Bowers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.92172","article-title":"A review of interspinous fusion devices: high complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes","volume":"3","author":"Epstein","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B36","first-page":"1529","author":"Davis","year":"2013"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.14444\/3006","article-title":"Evaluation of decompression and interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Musacchio","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2009.46.4.292","article-title":"Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous U (Coflex","volume":"46","author":"Park","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/1749-799X-7-35","article-title":"Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with microdecompression and interspinous distraction device insertion. A case series","volume":"7","author":"Ploumis","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1229-9","article-title":"Does an interspinous device (Coflex\u2122) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients","volume":"19","author":"Richter","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31825f7203","article-title":"Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study","volume":"27","author":"Richter","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"4","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.11.SPINE17643","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization","volume":"28","author":"Schmidt","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.09.030","article-title":"Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: a minimum 5-year follow-up study","volume":"35","author":"Yuan","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1267086","article-title":"Efficacy of interspinous device versus surgical decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a modified network analysis","volume":"2","author":"Chou","year":"2011","journal-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J"},{"issue":"3","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2003.11.006","article-title":"Effects of laminectomy and facetectomy on the stability of the lumbar motion segment","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Med Eng Phys"},{"issue":"suppl 5","key":"2024040307535357100_pnad159-B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1938-8","article-title":"Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment","volume":"20","author":"Le Huec","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"}],"container-title":["Pain Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/advance-article-pdf\/doi\/10.1093\/pm\/pnad159\/54908855\/pnad159.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article-pdf\/25\/4\/283\/57089034\/pnad159.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article-pdf\/25\/4\/283\/57089034\/pnad159.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]],"date-time":"2024-04-03T10:25:49Z","timestamp":1712139949000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article\/25\/4\/283\/7462775"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pm\/pnad159","relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-2375","1526-4637"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1526-2375","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-4637","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,8]]}}}