{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,6]],"date-time":"2026-06-06T23:25:49Z","timestamp":1780788349091,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,19]],"date-time":"2019-03-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1552953600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aims of this study were to identify the reasons for explanation of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) devices and to further quantify the proportions and time lines of these causes of explantation in order to determine improvement opportunities for the development of best practices.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective, single academic center.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who were implanted with percutaneous SCS devices from 2002 to 2015 and with follow-up available until the end of September 2017 were included in this retrospective chart analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of the 356 patients trialed, 252 underwent implantation of an SCS device with a permanent to trial ratio of 71%. Of the patients who had a permanent implant, 50% had failed back surgery syndrome, 25% had complex regional pain syndrome, and 25% had other diagnoses. At the end of the study period, the explantation rate was 30%. The causes for explantation included biological complications (26.6%), paresthesia limitations or side effects (26.6%), hardware complications (13.3%), ineffective pain control (28%), and no further need for stimulation therapy (5.3%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Device removal is not uncommon, and opportunities to enhance the long-term success of SCS devices do exist. These include modification of trialing methods, achieving better paresthesia overlay, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional equipment, development of robust technologies and hardware to reduce equipment malfunction, and improving efficacy with new innovative wave forms.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/pm\/pny245","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,15]],"date-time":"2018-10-15T15:13:11Z","timestamp":1539616391000},"page":"1355-1361","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Explantation of Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Devices: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of a Single-Center 15-Year Experience"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Thomas","family":"Simopoulos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Moris","family":"Aner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sanjiv","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Priyanka","family":"Ghosh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jatinder S","family":"Gill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1403.2009.00264.x","article-title":"Estimates of annual spinal cord stimulator implant rises in the United States","volume":"13","author":"Prager","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1111\/pme.12264","article-title":"Sate of the field survey: Spinal cord stimulator use by academic pain medicine practices","volume":"15","author":"Gharibo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9","article-title":"The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained; a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation","volume":"63","author":"Kumar","year":"2008","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000144839.65524.E0","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial","volume":"56","author":"North","year":"2005","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1111\/papr.12340","article-title":"Patient outcomes and spinal cord stimulation: A retrospective cases series evaluating patient satisfaction, pain scores and opioid requirements","volume":"16","author":"Sanders","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pain Prac"},{"issue":"2","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000255522.42579.EA","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: A cost effectiveness and utility analysis based on a randomized controlled trial","volume":"61","author":"North","year":"2007","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0b013e3181daccec","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of the failed back surgery syndrome","volume":"26","author":"Taylor","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12564","article-title":"The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) safety guidelines for the reduction of severe neurological injury","volume":"20","author":"Deer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12565","article-title":"The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations for infection prevention and management","volume":"20","author":"Deer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12542","article-title":"The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations on bleeding and coagulation management in neurostimulation devices","volume":"20","author":"Deer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12199","article-title":"A national survey of spinal cord stimulation trial to permanent conversion rates","volume":"18","author":"Huang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12582","article-title":"Specialty-based variations in spinal cord stimulation success rates for treatment of chronic pain","volume":"20","author":"Hussaini","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1093\/pm\/pnv025","article-title":"Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: A review of the literature","volume":"17","author":"Eldabe","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12312","article-title":"Treatment-limiting complications of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: A review of eight years of experience from an academic center database","volume":"18","author":"Hayek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12634","article-title":"Multicenter retrospective study of neurostimulation with exit of therapy by explant","volume":"20","author":"Pope","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B16","first-page":"617","article-title":"Detailed analysis of allergic reactions to spinal cord stimulator devices","volume":"6","author":"Chaudhry","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Pain Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-2500.2010.00407.x","article-title":"Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: Indications and complications","volume":"11","author":"Mekhail","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12587","article-title":"A spinal cord stimulation service review from a single centre using a single manufacturer over a 7.5 year follow up period","volume":"20","author":"Thomson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12148","article-title":"Device complication and failure management in neuromodulation","volume":"16","author":"Levy","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12567","article-title":"Explantation rates and healthcare resource utilization in spinal cord stimulation","volume":"20","author":"Han","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"5","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12687","article-title":"A temporary versus permanent anchored percutaneous lead trial of spinal cord stimulation: A comparison of patient outcomes and adverse events","volume":"21","author":"Simopoulos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12609","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation implant infection rates and risk factors: A multicenter retrospective study","volume":"20","author":"Hoelzer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B23","first-page":"254","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: A 20-year literature review","volume":"100","author":"Cameron","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E397","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj.2014\/17\/E397","article-title":"Case series on variable presentation of ligamentum flavum stimulation following percutaneous cylindrical spinal cord stimulator lead implants","volume":"17","author":"Jang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj.2012\/15\/1","article-title":"Sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain","volume":"15","author":"Schultz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000000814","article-title":"Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: A randomized comparative trial","volume":"158","author":"Deer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Pain"},{"issue":"5","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000001418","article-title":"Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial","volume":"79","author":"Kapural","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12624","article-title":"Conventional and novel spinal cord algorithms: Hypothetical mechanisms of action and comments on outcomes","volume":"20","author":"Linderoth","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"7","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12642","article-title":"Therapy-related explant after spinal cord stimulation: Results of an international retrospective chart review study","volume":"20","author":"Van Buyten","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000774","article-title":"Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF-10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back and leg pain. The Senza RCT randomized control trial","volume":"123","author":"Kapural","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj\/2019.19.267","article-title":"High frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of chronic pain","volume":"19","author":"Russo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"6","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12637","article-title":"Pocket pain and neuromodulation: Negligible or neglected","volume":"20","author":"Dietvorst","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"5","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31815dc5ae","article-title":"Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: Evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California","volume":"46","author":"Mitchell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"2019070801555087300_pny245-B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E295","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj.2013\/16\/E295","article-title":"Magnetic imaging of the lumbar spine in a patient with a spinal cord stimulator","volume":"16","author":"Simopoulos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Pain Physician"}],"container-title":["Pain Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article-pdf\/20\/7\/1355\/28908485\/pny245.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,3]],"date-time":"2026-04-03T20:06:23Z","timestamp":1775246783000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article\/20\/7\/1355\/5393617"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,19]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,19]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pm\/pny245","relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-2375","1526-4637"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1526-2375","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-4637","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,19]]}}}