{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,24]],"date-time":"2026-04-24T19:08:20Z","timestamp":1777057700668,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"Supplement_2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,6]],"date-time":"2019-12-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575590400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Postlaminectomy syndrome diagnoses secondary to adjacent segment degeneration are a substantial and rising cause of morbidity in the United States. Emerging spinal cord neuromodulation technologies have produced successful outcomes for postlaminectomy neuropathic pain but are less effective in treating neurogenic claudication secondary to recurrent lumbar stenosis. Percutaneous interspinous process decompression systems can be used as a salvage treatment modality for persistent structural neurogenic claudication in postlaminectomy syndrome or after spinal cord stimulator implantation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This paper is a review of emerging evidence for efficacious utilization of percutaneous interspinous process decompression.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A recent pragmatic trial of subjects who underwent percutaneous interspinous process decompression for lumbar stenosis with intermittent neurogenic claudication reported that 63% (26\/41) maintained minimal clinically important improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) leg pain, 61% (25\/41) in VAS back pain, 78% (32\/41) in function objective values, and 88% (36\/41) reported satisfaction with treatment at 12\u2009months postop. All subjects in a small case series of seven individuals with postlaminectomy adjacent-segment disease reported postoperative satisfaction scores of 3 or 4 on a 0\u20134 scale and were also able to decrease or wean completely off controlled pain medications. In another study, there was a significant decrease in average leg pain (60% improvement, P\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.0001, N\u2009=\u200925) and axial low back pain (58% improvement, P\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.0001, N\u2009=\u200925) in patients who underwent one- or two-level percutaneous interspinous process decompression as a rescue treatment for reemerging neurogenic claudication after spinal cord stimulator implantation.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The spine often is a focus of progressive disease. Furthermore, mechanical changes associated with spinal instrumentation can lead to additional disease at adjacent levels. Many individuals will present with symptomatic neurogenic claudication recalcitrant to multimodal management strategies, including even the most sophisticated neuromodulation technologies. Implementation of salvage percutaneous interspinus process decompression implantation in cases of adjacent segment degeneration or incomplete spinal cord stimulation can decompress structural causes of neurogenic claudication while sparing the patient from more invasive surgical reoperation techniques.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/pm\/pnz247","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,11]],"date-time":"2019-09-11T03:22:17Z","timestamp":1568172137000},"page":"S9-S13","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A Review of Emerging Evidence for Utilization of a Percutaneous Interspinous Process Decompression Device to Treat Symptomatic Lumbar Adjacent-Segment Degeneration"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"20","author":[{"suffix":"MD","given":"Timothy R","family":"Deer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"suffix":"MD","given":"Dawood","family":"Sayed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"suffix":"DO","given":"Mark N","family":"Malinowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"suffix":"MD","given":"Jeffery J","family":"Rowe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Main Line Spine Center, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"suffix":"MD","given":"Jessica B","family":"Jameson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Axis Spine Center, Post Falls, Idaho"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0605-0546","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"PhD","given":"Kevin","family":"Liang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Milestone Research Organization, San Diego, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6861-0073","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"MD","given":"Joseph A","family":"Sclafani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Milestone Research Organization, San Diego, California"},{"name":"Apex Pain and Wellness, Foster City, California, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb","article-title":"Spinal fusion in the United States: Analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008","volume":"37","author":"Rajaee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B2","first-page":"S1","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Technical feasibility and initial results","volume":"18","author":"Schwender","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200202150-00021","article-title":"A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine","volume":"27","author":"Guiot","year":"2002","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B4","article-title":"Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: Prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery","volume":"35(Suppl)","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012","article-title":"Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): A novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"6","author":"Ozgur","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"6","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199703150-00023","article-title":"A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"22","author":"Mayer","year":"1997","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.08.011","article-title":"Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication","volume":"9","author":"Glassman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semss.2013.03.007","article-title":"Lumbar iatrogenic spinal instability","volume":"25","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"Semin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200103150-00024","article-title":"Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Results of operative management","volume":"26","author":"Suk","year":"2001","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.09.026","article-title":"Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis","volume":"11","author":"Sears","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"20","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2253","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e","article-title":"Adjacent segment disease following lumbar\/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: A minimum 5-year follow-up","volume":"32","author":"Cheh","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1497","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200407000-00020","article-title":"Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine","volume":"86","author":"Ghiselli","year":"2004","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"issue":"5","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/S0885-3924(96)00322-3","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation: A valuable treatment for chronic failed back surgery patients","volume":"13","author":"Devulder","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Pain Symptom Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000144839.65524.E0","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial","volume":"56","author":"North","year":"2005","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000255522.42579.EA","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: A cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"61","author":"North","year":"2007","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12698","article-title":"Success Using Neuromodulation with BURST (SUNBURST) study: Results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial using a novel burst waveform","volume":"21","author":"Deer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"4","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000774","article-title":"Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Kapural","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000001418","article-title":"Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial","volume":"79","author":"Kapural","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"12","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2401","DOI":"10.1093\/pm\/pnx241","article-title":"Prospective, randomized blind effect-on-outcome study of conventional vs high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with pain and disability due to failed back surgery syndrome","volume":"18","author":"De Andres","year":"2017","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12312","article-title":"Treatment-limiting complications of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: A review of eight years of experience from an academic center database","volume":"18","author":"Hayek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"7","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12642","article-title":"Therapy-related explants after spinal cord stimulation: Results of an international retrospective chart review study","volume":"20","author":"Van Buyten","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12634","article-title":"Multicenter retrospective study of neurostimulation with exit of therapy by explant","volume":"20","author":"Pope","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2013.54.6.501","article-title":"Factors associated with the success of trial spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain from failed back surgery syndrome","volume":"54","author":"Son","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"issue":"3","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B24","first-page":"255","article-title":"Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine","volume":"20","author":"Bono","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contemp Spine Surg"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B25","first-page":"72","article-title":"An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: Preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases","volume":"17","author":"Lee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"23","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2677","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000187878.79676.26","article-title":"The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device","volume":"30","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001105010361","article-title":"Minimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the Superion\u00ae interspinous spacer","volume":"5","author":"Bini","year":"2011","journal-title":"Open Orthop J"},{"issue":"2","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0492-x","article-title":"High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"17","author":"Verhoof","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B29","article-title":"Cyclic loads do not compromise functionality of the interspinous spacer or cause damage to the spinal segment: An in vitro analysis","author":"Goyal","year":"2008","journal-title":"Crit Rev Neurobiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000735","article-title":"Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: Two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial","volume":"40","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2943","DOI":"10.2147\/JPR.S182322","article-title":"Interspinous process decompression is associated with a reduction in opioid analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"11","author":"Nunley","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Pain Res"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B32","volume-title":"Interspinous Process Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Real World Experience from a Device Registry","author":"Deer","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B33","volume-title":"Interspinous Spacer (Superion) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion","author":"Mehta","year":"2018"},{"key":"2020042504454677200_pnz247-B34","author":"Deer"}],"container-title":["Pain Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article-pdf\/20\/Supplement_2\/S9\/33126791\/pnz247.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article-pdf\/20\/Supplement_2\/S9\/33126791\/pnz247.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,25]],"date-time":"2020-04-25T08:46:14Z","timestamp":1587804374000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/painmedicine\/article\/20\/Supplement_2\/S9\/5661170"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"Supplement_2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pm\/pnz247","relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-2375","1526-4637"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1526-2375","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-4637","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]]}}}