{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,7]],"date-time":"2026-11-07T16:54:49Z","timestamp":1794070489542,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]],"date-time":"2018-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535932800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Clinical outcome measures are important to use for individuals with lower limb amputations (LLA) because such individuals require intensive functional gait training before and after being fitted with prostheses. Using standardized instruments throughout the episode of care allows clinicians to objectively monitor patient progress, make evidence-based decisions regarding the plan of care, and communicate results in meaningful ways to patients, payers, and other clinicians. Many clinical outcome measures exist, but not all have been validated and shown to be reliable within this population of interest.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the psychometric properties of all current performance-based outcome measures applicable to individuals with lower limb amputations.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Data Sources<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Reviewers searched for articles using the online databases PubMed\/MEDLINE and CINAHL. Reviewers also conducted a manual search of the reference list of 1 of the previously published systematic reviews to identify any additional studies not detected with the online database search.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Study Selection<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The 2 reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance. The same reviewers obtained and read full-text articles of the potentially relevant studies. Reviewers resolved any discrepancies of the inclusion assessment by further discussion.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Data Extraction<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The reviewers created tables to extract psychometric properties of interest from the included articles. Both reviewers extracted the data from the articles and placed relevant values into a table for each primary outcome measure identified.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Data Synthesis<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The rigor of study reporting was guided by use of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Checklist. Each reviewer independently read and appraised the included articles, assigning a score to each checklist item. The sum of scores for each item was calculated to appraise the overall quality of reporting of the included articles.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Limitations<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Review-level limitations included the absence of a third reviewer to settle any disagreements on article inclusion and article appraisal. Additionally, the percentage of reviewer agreement on article appraisal was not determined before disagreements about checklist item satisfaction were resolved. Furthermore, reviewers only extracted data on reliability, validity, and responsiveness; instrument characteristics, such as floor and ceiling effects, are also important.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Valid and reliable performance-based clinical measures of ambulation in individuals with LLA were identified. Further research should investigate the minimally clinical, important difference of these clinical measures and address trends in unmet reporting guidelines.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/pzy107","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,30]],"date-time":"2018-08-30T19:33:34Z","timestamp":1535657614000},"page":"1037-1045","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Clinical Performance\u2013Based Outcome Measures of Walking for Individuals With Lower Limb Amputations: A Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"98","author":[{"given":"Emily J","family":"Hawkins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529 (USA)"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William","family":"Riddick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Mission Gait, Richmond, Virginia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib1","volume-title":"Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice","author":"Portney","year":"2015","edition":"3rd ed"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Clinical outcome measures for rehabilitation of amputees: a review","volume":"3","author":"Agrawal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys Med Rehabil Int"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20080234","article-title":"Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications","volume":"89","author":"Jette","year":"2009","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.014","article-title":"Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration","volume":"12","author":"Vandenbroucke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1097\/00008526-200601001-00004","article-title":"Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: a review of the literature 1995 to 2005","volume":"18","author":"Condie","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Prosthet Orthot"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20100287","article-title":"Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical error","volume":"91","author":"Resnik","year":"2011","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g7647","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7647","article-title":"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation","volume":"350","author":"Shamseer","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.25153","article-title":"The 2-minute walk test as a measure of functional improvement in persons with lower limb amputation","volume":"82","author":"Brooks","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1562","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2002.34600","article-title":"Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with transtibial amputation","volume":"83","author":"Brooks","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2008.05.021","article-title":"Six-minute walk test in persons with transtibial amputation","volume":"89","author":"Lin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-1916","article-title":"Going places: does the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees","volume":"47","author":"Reid","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(99)90234-4","article-title":"The Timed \u201cup and go\u201d test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation","volume":"80","author":"Schoppen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215517728324","article-title":"The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: the utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations","volume":"32","author":"Clemens","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/85.7.626","article-title":"The L Test of Functional Mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the Timed \u201cUp & Go\u201d Test designed for people with lower-limb amputations","volume":"85","author":"Deathe","year":"2005","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2002.32309","article-title":"The Amputee Mobility Predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate","volume":"83","author":"Gailey","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2012.05.0099","article-title":"Development and reliability testing of the Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP) in male servicemembers with traumatic lower-limb loss","volume":"50","author":"Gailey","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2012.05.0100","article-title":"Construct validity of Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP) for male servicemembers with traumatic lower-limb loss","volume":"50","author":"Gailey","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v7.i6.383","article-title":"Quantifying prosthetic gait deviation using simple outcome measures","volume":"7","author":"Kark","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Orthop"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364614545418","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference of the L Test for individuals with lower limb amputation: a pilot study","volume":"39","author":"Rushton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prosthet Orthot Int"},{"key":"2023011808001832200_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2009.12.009","article-title":"Ambulation of people with lower-limb amputations: relationship between capacity and performance measures","volume":"91","author":"Parker","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"}],"container-title":["Physical Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ptj\/article-pdf\/98\/12\/1037\/48751483\/ptj_98_12_1037.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ptj\/article-pdf\/98\/12\/1037\/48751483\/ptj_98_12_1037.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,18]],"date-time":"2023-01-18T08:00:48Z","timestamp":1674028848000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ptj\/article\/98\/12\/1037\/5089980"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ptj\/pzy107","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-9023","1538-6724"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0031-9023","type":"print"},{"value":"1538-6724","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]]}}}