{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,20]],"date-time":"2024-03-20T17:15:36Z","timestamp":1710954936354},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,16]],"date-time":"2018-11-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1542326400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical practice of CR mammography in Tanzania. The equipment performance and operational conditions were studied; and mean glandular dose (DG) estimated to 75 women undergoing diagnosis at three mammography facilities. All mammograms during this study were reported to be useful for the intended diagnosis. The median DG for craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections ranged from 1.27 \u00b1 0.18 mGy to 1.9 \u00b1 0.27 mGy and from 1.3 \u00b1 0.18 mGy to 1.9 \u00b1 0.27 mGy, respectively, and were below the national regulatory guidance of 2.5 mGy. Despite this positive result, unavoidable inappropriate use of beam quality and tube loading settings which could have been through appropriate staff training and performing routine quality control were not uncommon. This work provides an insight of current operational conditions of CR in Tanzania and what strategy should be employed to this service to improve patient care in the country.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncy191","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,16]],"date-time":"2018-10-16T19:14:41Z","timestamp":1539717281000},"page":"109-115","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["CHALLENGES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF CR MAMMOGRAPHY IN TANZANIA"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"184","author":[{"given":"Jofrey","family":"Jackson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Physics Department, University of Dar es Salaam, Uvumbuzi Road, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wilbroad E","family":"Muhogora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission, Njiro Block J, Arusha, Tanzania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ismael N","family":"Makundi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Physics Department, University of Dar es Salaam, Uvumbuzi Road, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C1","author":"Juliet","year":"2009"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"w397","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.9614","article-title":"Effects of quality assurance regulatory enforcement in performance of mammography systems: evidence from large scale surveys in Taiwan. Medical Physics and Informatics","volume":"201","author":"Hwang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"issue":"4","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C3","first-page":"568","article-title":"The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements","volume":"32","author":"Mackenzie","year":"2006","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C4","volume-title":"Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography","author":"International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)","year":"2011"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncq354","article-title":"Measurement of the radiation dose and assessment of the risk in mammography screening for early detection of cancer of the breast in Israel","volume":"143","author":"Broisman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C6","author":"Barzanje","year":"2017"},{"issue":"1","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"013502","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JMI.4.1.013502","article-title":"Mean glandular dose in digital mammography: a dose calculation comparison","volume":"4","author":"Suleiman","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Med. Imaging"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C8","first-page":"1","article-title":"Exposure parameters of mammograms with and without mass lesions from South African breast care centre","volume":"215","author":"Acho","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncx017","article-title":"Patient exposure during plain radiography and mammography in Japan in 1974\u20132014","volume":"176","author":"Matsunaga","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C10","volume-title":"Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 457","author":"International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)","year":"2007"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C11","author":"Institute of Physics in Engineering and Medicine (IPEM)","year":"2005"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-017-0550-9","article-title":"Overview of the radiographers\u2019 practice in 65 health care centres using digital mammography systems in Portugal","volume":"8","author":"Sa dos Reis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-69-822-555","article-title":"Dose and image quality in mammography with automatic beam quality system","volume":"69","author":"Young","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/35\/9\/002","article-title":"Monte-Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose","volume":"35","author":"Dance","year":"1990","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C15","first-page":"122","article-title":"Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit","volume":"14","author":"Bor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Diagn. Interv. Radiol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3225","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/45\/11\/308","article-title":"Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol","volume":"45","author":"Dance","year":"2000","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C17","volume-title":"European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis","author":"European Commission","year":"2006","edition":"fourth edn"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12540","article-title":"Dignostic reference levels for digital mammography in New South Wales","volume":"61","author":"Suleiman","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncr339","article-title":"Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece","volume":"147","author":"Kalathaki","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apradiso.2013.07.009","article-title":"Exploratory survey of image quality on CR digital mammography imaging systems in Mexico","volume":"83","author":"Gaona","year":"2014","journal-title":"Appl. Radiat. Isot."},{"issue":"3","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3885-y","article-title":"Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detector","volume":"26","author":"Mackenzie","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C22","first-page":"251","article-title":"Comparison of mammography radiation dose values obtained from direct incident air kerma measurements with values from measured X ray spectral data","volume":"62","author":"Asiamah","year":"2005","journal-title":"Appl. Radiat. Isot."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2011.05.026","article-title":"Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 Countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA Projects","volume":"81","author":"Ciraj-Bjelac","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J. Radiol."},{"issue":"3","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"031202","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JMI.4.3.031202","article-title":"Review of the current status of radiation protection in diagnostic radiology in Africa","volume":"4","author":"Muhogora","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Med. Imaging (Bellingham)"},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmir.2015.06.004","article-title":"Quality control measures in Tanzania: is it done?","volume":"46","author":"Ngoye","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Med. Imag. Radiat. Sci."},{"key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncy019","article-title":"Survey of imaging technology and patient dose recording practice in developing countries","author":"Rehani","year":"2018","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim"},{"issue":"1\u20134","key":"2019072512301669600_ncy191C27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncv092","article-title":"Mean glandular dose in six digital mammography services in Santiago, Chile. Preliminary reference levels","volume":"165","author":"Leyton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim"}],"container-title":["Radiation Protection Dosimetry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article-pdf\/184\/1\/109\/29001844\/ncy191.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,25]],"date-time":"2019-07-25T16:30:36Z","timestamp":1564072236000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article\/184\/1\/109\/5184940"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,16]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncy191","relation":{},"ISSN":["0144-8420","1742-3406"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0144-8420","type":"print"},{"value":"1742-3406","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,16]]}}}